NCT06839573

Brief Summary

Teaching using VR for basic cardiopulmonary resuscitation and patient examination (experimental group) will not result in differences in knowledge and skill acquisition compared to traditional classroom-based simulation teaching (control group), but it will lead to greater satisfaction and self-confidence. Open, single-center randomized clinical trial involving fourth-year nursing degree students at a public university. Participants will be assigned based on their usual teaching groups (ratio of 6-8 students per instructor) and, according to randomization, will receive a 1:1 assignment to either the control group (classroom-based simulation teaching) or the experimental group (classroom-based simulation teaching combined with VR headset teaching). The CONSORT checklist will be followed to report the study.

Trial Health

35
At Risk

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Trial has exceeded expected completion date
Enrollment
140

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Mar 2025

Shorter than P25 for not_applicable

Status
not yet recruiting

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

January 25, 2025

Completed
27 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

February 21, 2025

Completed
12 days until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

March 5, 2025

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

March 5, 2025

Completed
2 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

May 8, 2025

Completed
Last Updated

February 21, 2025

Status Verified

February 1, 2025

Enrollment Period

Same day

First QC Date

January 25, 2025

Last Update Submit

February 19, 2025

Conditions

Keywords

Virtual realitynursing studentsLearning OutcomesInmersive virtual reality

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (2)

  • Compare the satisfaction

    To compare the satisfaction acquired by students when performing basic cardiopulmonary resuscitation and patient examination between both teaching groups (experimental group - EG: VR plus in-person simulation, control group - CG: in-person simulation). We will mesure this with Satisfaction and Self-Confidence in Learning Scale (SCLS-Sp) (Farrés-Tarafa et al., 2021) .

    Five months

  • Compare the self-confidence

    To compare the self-confidence acquired by students when performing basic cardiopulmonary resuscitation and patient examination between both teaching groups (experimental group - EG: VR plus in-person simulation, control group - CG: in-person simulation). We will mesure this with Satisfaction and Self-Confidence in Learning Scale (SCLS-Sp) (Farrés-Tarafa et al., 2021) .

    Five months

Secondary Outcomes (5)

  • To compare the acquisition of knowledge in each teaching group.

    Five months

  • To compare the acquisition of skills in each teaching group.

    Five months

  • To evaluate students' tolerance to VR headset technology.

    Five months

  • To assess the usability of VR headsets by students.

    Five months

  • To analyze the costs of traditional teaching with in-person simulation compared to teaching with VR.

    Five months

Study Arms (2)

RV INTERVENTION

EXPERIMENTAL

Experience with virtual reality glasses

Other: Experience with virtual reality glasses

NON RV CONTROL

NO INTERVENTION

Group Control

Interventions

If the group belongs to GE (teaching with in-person simulation in the classroom and teaching with VR headsets), they will also receive the two training sessions described for GC: 30 minutes of individual training through VR (headsets and controllers to perform actions while receiving immediate feedback through VR) before the in-person simulation.

Also known as: Formative intervention
RV INTERVENTION

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • \- having completed the scheduled in-person simulation in previous years of the degree .

You may not qualify if:

  • the student does not sign the informed consent to participate in the study.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Central Study Contacts

Isabel Almodóvar-Fernández, PhD

CONTACT

Marta Raurell-Torredà, phD

CONTACT

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
TRIPLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR
Purpose
OTHER
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Model Details: Open, single-center randomized clinical trial involving fourth-year nursing degree students at a public university. Participants will be assigned based on their usual teaching groups (ratio of 6-8 students per instructor) and, according to randomization, will receive a 1:1 assignment to either the control group (classroom-based simulation teaching) or the experimental group (classroom-based simulation teaching combined with VR headset teaching). The CONSORT checklist will be followed to report the study.
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Principal Investigator

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

January 25, 2025

First Posted

February 21, 2025

Study Start

March 5, 2025

Primary Completion

March 5, 2025

Study Completion

May 8, 2025

Last Updated

February 21, 2025

Record last verified: 2025-02

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will share

The study is multicenter, so it is already planned to be shared with other researchers.

Shared Documents
CSR