Comparison of Two Neuromuscular Anesthetics Reversal in Obese Patient Undergoing Bariatric Surgery
1 other identifier
observational
40
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The study is a prospective, single center, double arm study aiming at the comparison of 2 commercial neuromuscular block reversal drugs: Neostigmine (Cooper S.A.) and Sugammadex (MSD). A faster recovery from neuromuscular block is expected for patients receiving Sugammadex and this protocol is of high importance for anesthesia of morbid obese patients during bariatric surgery.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for all trials
Started Jul 2012
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
June 14, 2012
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
June 29, 2012
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
July 1, 2012
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
May 1, 2014
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
May 1, 2014
CompletedJune 25, 2014
March 1, 2012
1.8 years
June 14, 2012
June 24, 2014
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Safety of Sugammadex reversal - number of drug-related adverse events with Sugammadex <= that of Neostigmine.
The number of drug-related adverse events using Sugammadex is smaller or equal to those using Neostigmine.
Monitoring nueromuscular reaction from end of anesthesia recovery (in the OR) intil patient is released from hospital (48-72 h post surgery)
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Use of Sugammadex for neuromuscular anaesthesia reversal higher patient satisfaction compared to Neostigmine.
Monitoring nueromuscular reaction from end of anesthesia recovery (in the OR) intil patient is released from hospital (48-72 h post surgery)
Study Arms (2)
Patients recieving Sugammadex
Sugammadex Group (n=20) - anesthesia induced by Rocuronium 0.4mg/kg body, additional Rocuronium 0.1-0.2 mg/kg body as needed during surgery (not more than x2), muscular blockage reversal using Sugammadex 2.0 mg/kg body.
Patients recieving Neostigmine
Neostigmine Group (n=20) - anesthesia induced by Rocuronium 0.4mg/kg body, additional Rocuronium 0.1-0.2 mg/kg body as needed during surgery (not more than x2), muscular blockage reversal using Neostigmine 0.05 mg/kg body and atropine 0.1 mg/kg body.
Interventions
* Sugammadex Group (n=20) - anesthesia induced by Rocuronium 0.4mg/kg body, additional Rocuronium 0.1-0.2 mg/kg body as needed during surgery (not more than x2), muscular blockage reversal using Sugammadex 2.0 mg/kg body. * Neostigmine Group (n=20) - anesthesia induced by Rocuronium 0.4mg/kg body, additional Rocuronium 0.1-0.2 mg/kg body as needed during surgery (not more than x2), muscular blockage reversal using Neostigmine 0.05 mg/kg body and atropine 0.1 mg/kg body.
Eligibility Criteria
Subjects for the study will be recruited from patients within the community who have sought treatment for morbid obesity by bariatric surgery, are qualified for the surgery and meet all of the eligibility criteria listed below.
You may qualify if:
- Morbidly obese male or female patients in the age 20-65 that are candidates for bariatric surgery.
- Patients that can read and understand the fundamental nature of the clinical protocol.
- Patients must sign the Informed Consent Form.
You may not qualify if:
- Patients treated with drugs that might interact with Rocuronium.
- Patients with history of malignant hyperthermia.
- Patients with significant renal disease.
- Patients with a known allergy to one of the drugs used during anesthesia.
- Patients with known muscular disease.
- Patients with severe cardiovascular disease (NYHA\>2)
- Breast feeding patients
- Patients refusing to follow the clinical protocol.
- Patients participating in a different clinical trial.
- Patients refusing to sign the Informed Consent Form
- Physician's objection.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Assuta Medical Center
Tel Aviv, Israel
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Asnat Raziel, MD
Medical Director, ICBS-Israeli Center for Bariatric Surgery
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- CASE CONTROL
- Time Perspective
- PROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
June 14, 2012
First Posted
June 29, 2012
Study Start
July 1, 2012
Primary Completion
May 1, 2014
Study Completion
May 1, 2014
Last Updated
June 25, 2014
Record last verified: 2012-03