A Comparison of Desflurane vs. Sevoflurane and the Time to Awakening and the Incidence and Severity of Cough
1 other identifier
interventional
85
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Goals for ambulatory surgery include providing optimal surgical conditions while ensuring a rapid early recovery without side effect. Dexter et al1 concluded in a meta-analysis that Desflurane can reduce the extubation time when compared to Sevoflurane. This potential benefit of Desflurane can be especially attractive in short ambulatory cases performed with general anesthesia with a laryngeal mask airway. Although some studies have not shown a difference on perioperative cough and laryngospasm between Desflurane and Sevoflurane at clinically relevant doses.It has been reported in the literature that Desflurane causes cough4 and many providers avoid using Desflurane with a LMA (laryngeal mask airway) in the ambulatory setting. In this study we will also evaluate, as a secondary outcome, the presence and severity of perioperative cough and laryngospasm. Previous investigators have demonstrated a more rapid resumption of normal daily activities after ambulatory surgery in patients anesthetized with Desflurane when compared with Sevoflurane.these investigators suggested a better quality of recovery when Desflurane is used probably due to a lower lipid solubility of Desflurane. We will also evaluate quality of recovery as a secondary outcome using a validated instrument. Significance:
- 1.A more rapid awakening, especially, in a fast and high turnover cases that are performed with LMA can lead to a more cost effective utilization of operating room time
- 2.It has been reported that Desflurane causes more cough than Sevoflurane and Anesthesiologists avoid using Desflurane with LMA cases, this study will reinforce that there is no difference.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable surgery
Started Feb 2010
Typical duration for not_applicable surgery
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
February 1, 2010
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
September 13, 2010
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
September 15, 2010
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
March 1, 2012
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
March 1, 2012
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
July 25, 2013
CompletedNovember 25, 2013
October 1, 2013
2.1 years
September 13, 2010
April 8, 2013
October 29, 2013
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Time to Awakening
Time inhalational agent is turned off to time of patient awakening
Secondary Outcomes (2)
Number of Participants Who Coughed
Perioperative
Quality of Recovery 40
1 day
Study Arms (2)
Desflurane
ACTIVE COMPARATORAdministration of Desflurane
Sevoflurane
ACTIVE COMPARATORAdministration of Sevoflurane
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Age 18-65
- Female patients undergoing outpatient gynecologic and breast surgery
- Under general anesthesia using an LMA
- ASA I,II,
You may not qualify if:
- Patients on CNS depressants
- Chronic opioid use
- Corticosteroid
- Pregnant patients
- Full stomach
- Morbidly obese (BMI \>35kg/m2)
- Hepatitis B
- Hepatitis C
- Coronary artery disease
- Liver disease
- Renal disease
- Seizure disorder
- Dropout criteria:
- Need for endotracheal tube
- Surgeon or patient request
- +1 more criteria
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Northwestern University
Chicago, Illinois, 60611, United States
Related Publications (5)
Dexter F, Bayman EO, Epstein RH. Statistical modeling of average and variability of time to extubation for meta-analysis comparing desflurane to sevoflurane. Anesth Analg. 2010 Feb 1;110(2):570-80. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0b013e3181b5dcb7. Epub 2009 Oct 9.
PMID: 19820242BACKGROUNDMcKay RE, Bostrom A, Balea MC, McKay WR. Airway responses during desflurane versus sevoflurane administration via a laryngeal mask airway in smokers. Anesth Analg. 2006 Nov;103(5):1147-54. doi: 10.1213/01.ane.0000237293.39466.65.
PMID: 17056947BACKGROUNDWhite PF, Eshima RW, Maurer A, King T, Lin BK, Heavner JE, Bogetz MS, Kaye AD. A comparison of airway responses during desflurane and sevoflurane administration via a laryngeal mask airway for maintenance of anesthesia. Anesth Analg. 2003 Mar;96(3):701-705. doi: 10.1213/01.ANE.0000048978.40522.AB.
PMID: 12598249BACKGROUNDArain SR, Shankar H, Ebert TJ. Desflurane enhances reactivity during the use of the laryngeal mask airway. Anesthesiology. 2005 Sep;103(3):495-9. doi: 10.1097/00000542-200509000-00011.
PMID: 16129973BACKGROUNDMahmoud NA, Rose DJ, Laurence AS. Desflurane or sevoflurane for gynaecological day-case anaesthesia with spontaneous respiration? Anaesthesia. 2001 Feb;56(2):171-4. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2044.2001.01528.x.
PMID: 11167479BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Limitations and Caveats
Our study is only valid if interpreted within the context of its limitations. We have only evaluated female subjects undergoing ambulatory hysteroscopic surgery which limits the generalizability of our results.
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Gildasio De Oliveira, M.D.
- Organization
- Northwestern University
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Gildasio De Oliveira, M.D
Northwestern University
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restrictive Agreement
- No
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Principal Investigator
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
September 13, 2010
First Posted
September 15, 2010
Study Start
February 1, 2010
Primary Completion
March 1, 2012
Study Completion
March 1, 2012
Last Updated
November 25, 2013
Results First Posted
July 25, 2013
Record last verified: 2013-10