Effect of Deep BLock on Intraoperative Surgical Conditions
BLISS
1 other identifier
interventional
24
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Rationale: A deep neuromuscular block is often associated with improved surgical conditions especially in laparoscopic surgery. However, a deep block comes at the expense of a variety of items that may conflict with the use of a deep surgical muscle blockade including a long recovery phase, the need for muscle reversal, postoperative ventilation, impaired postoperative breathing. With the introduction of Sugammadex there is now the possibility to reverse an even deep surgical block. This may overcome most if not all of the issues mentioned. Objective: To assess whether a deep neuromuscular block provides better surgical conditions than a moderately deep block as derived from a surgical rating score. Study design: Single center, double-blind randomized controlled trial. Study population: 24 ASA I-III patients scheduled for laparoscopic renal (n=12, GROUP 1) or prostatic surgery (n=12, GROUP 2). Intervention: In both GROUP 1 and GROUP 2, 6 six patients will receive neuromuscular blockade according to current practice (atracurium (bolus) plus mivacurium (cont. infusion)) aimed at a moderately deep neuromuscular block (1-2 twitches in the Train of Four (TOF) monitor). The other six will receive a bolus plus continuous infusion with rocuronium aimed at a deep neuromuscular block (1-2 twitches post tetanic count (PTC)). All surgical procedures will be performed by one surgeon. Main study parameters/endpoints: To study the surgical conditions in patients undergoing laparoscopic renal or prostate surgery during deep versus less deep neuromuscular block as assessed by the surgical rating score. Nature and extent of the burden and risks associated with participation, benefit and group relatedness: Compared to current practice there will be no additional risk.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for phase_4
Started Jun 2012
Shorter than P25 for phase_4
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
June 1, 2012
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
June 19, 2012
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
June 28, 2012
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
March 1, 2013
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
March 1, 2013
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
October 17, 2016
CompletedOctober 17, 2016
August 1, 2016
9 months
June 19, 2012
April 12, 2013
August 23, 2016
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Surgical Rating Scale
During the procedure, the surgical condition will be scored by the surgeon using a 5-point surgical rating scale. In order to reduce variability in the surgical rating all surgeries will be performed by one single surgeon. The rating scale will be a 5-point ordinal scale ranging from 1 = poor condition to 5 = optimal surgical conditions. The surgeon will score the condition at 15 minute intervals. In case of a sudden change in surgical conditions additional scores will be added to the case record form. If conditions are poor (score 1 or 2), muscle relaxation will be increased, a score of 1 will be used. In each subject the scores over time were averaged and a comparison between treatments was performed using a t-test
Measurements will be made during the stay in the operating room for an average period of 3 hours
Secondary Outcomes (4)
Breathing
Measurements will be made during the stay in the recovery room for an average period of 3 hours
Post-operative Pain
measurements are made in the recovery room following surgery for an average prior of 1 hour
Postoperative Sedation Score
Measurements will be made during the stay in the operating room for an average period of 3 hours
Nausea and Vomiting
Measurements will be made during the stay in the operating room for an average period of 3 hours
Study Arms (2)
Deep surgical block
EXPERIMENTALContinuous rocuronium infusion will be used to induce a deep surgical block with post tetanic twitch count of max 2. Rocuronium loading dose = 1.0 mg/kg, followed by 0.6-1.0 mg/kg per hour.
Moderate/normal surgical block
ACTIVE COMPARATORA normal block will be induced by an atracurium bolus dose followed by a mivacurium infusion to induce a train of four count of 1-2.
Interventions
The surgical block will be varied by either induction of a deep block (via rocuronium infusion) or a moderate/normal block (using atracurium/mivacurium infusion)
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patients diagnosed with renal or prostatic disease who are will undergo an elective laparoscopic renal surgical procedure or laparoscopic prostatectomy;
- ASA class I-III
- \> 18 years of age;
- Ability to give oral and written informed consent
You may not qualify if:
- Known or suspected neuromuscular disorders impairing neuromuscular function;
- Allergies to muscle relaxants, anesthetics or narcotics;
- A (family) history of malignant hyperthermia;
- Patients who have a contraindication for neostigmine administration;
- Women who are or may be pregnant or are currently breast feeding;
- Renal insufficiency, as defined by serum creatinine x 2 of normal, or urine output \< 0.5 ml/kg/h for at least 6 h. When available, other indices will be taken into account as well such as glomerular filtration rate \< 60 ml/h and proteinuria (a ratio of 30 mg albumin to 1 g of creatinine).
- Previous retroperitoneal surgery at the site of the current surgery.
- Body mass index \> 35 kg/m2
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Leiden University Medical Center
Leiden, South Holland, 2333 ZA, Netherlands
Related Publications (1)
Boon M, Martini CH, Aarts LP, Bevers RF, Dahan A. Effect of variations in depth of neuromuscular blockade on rating of surgical conditions by surgeon and anesthesiologist in patients undergoing laparoscopic renal or prostatic surgery (BLISS trial): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials. 2013 Mar 1;14:63. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-14-63.
PMID: 23452344DERIVED
Related Links
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Dr. Albert Dahan
- Organization
- Leiden University Medical center
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Albert Dahan, MD {hD
LUMC
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restrictive Agreement
- No
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 4
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR
- Purpose
- PREVENTION
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
June 19, 2012
First Posted
June 28, 2012
Study Start
June 1, 2012
Primary Completion
March 1, 2013
Study Completion
March 1, 2013
Last Updated
October 17, 2016
Results First Posted
October 17, 2016
Record last verified: 2016-08