NCT01631149

Brief Summary

Rationale: A deep neuromuscular block is often associated with improved surgical conditions especially in laparoscopic surgery. However, a deep block comes at the expense of a variety of items that may conflict with the use of a deep surgical muscle blockade including a long recovery phase, the need for muscle reversal, postoperative ventilation, impaired postoperative breathing. With the introduction of Sugammadex there is now the possibility to reverse an even deep surgical block. This may overcome most if not all of the issues mentioned. Objective: To assess whether a deep neuromuscular block provides better surgical conditions than a moderately deep block as derived from a surgical rating score. Study design: Single center, double-blind randomized controlled trial. Study population: 24 ASA I-III patients scheduled for laparoscopic renal (n=12, GROUP 1) or prostatic surgery (n=12, GROUP 2). Intervention: In both GROUP 1 and GROUP 2, 6 six patients will receive neuromuscular blockade according to current practice (atracurium (bolus) plus mivacurium (cont. infusion)) aimed at a moderately deep neuromuscular block (1-2 twitches in the Train of Four (TOF) monitor). The other six will receive a bolus plus continuous infusion with rocuronium aimed at a deep neuromuscular block (1-2 twitches post tetanic count (PTC)). All surgical procedures will be performed by one surgeon. Main study parameters/endpoints: To study the surgical conditions in patients undergoing laparoscopic renal or prostate surgery during deep versus less deep neuromuscular block as assessed by the surgical rating score. Nature and extent of the burden and risks associated with participation, benefit and group relatedness: Compared to current practice there will be no additional risk.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
24

participants targeted

Target at below P25 for phase_4

Timeline
Completed

Started Jun 2012

Shorter than P25 for phase_4

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

June 1, 2012

Completed
18 days until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

June 19, 2012

Completed
9 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

June 28, 2012

Completed
8 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

March 1, 2013

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

March 1, 2013

Completed
3.6 years until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

October 17, 2016

Completed
Last Updated

October 17, 2016

Status Verified

August 1, 2016

Enrollment Period

9 months

First QC Date

June 19, 2012

Results QC Date

April 12, 2013

Last Update Submit

August 23, 2016

Conditions

Keywords

urologymuscle relaxationlaparoscopyanesthesiarocuronium

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Surgical Rating Scale

    During the procedure, the surgical condition will be scored by the surgeon using a 5-point surgical rating scale. In order to reduce variability in the surgical rating all surgeries will be performed by one single surgeon. The rating scale will be a 5-point ordinal scale ranging from 1 = poor condition to 5 = optimal surgical conditions. The surgeon will score the condition at 15 minute intervals. In case of a sudden change in surgical conditions additional scores will be added to the case record form. If conditions are poor (score 1 or 2), muscle relaxation will be increased, a score of 1 will be used. In each subject the scores over time were averaged and a comparison between treatments was performed using a t-test

    Measurements will be made during the stay in the operating room for an average period of 3 hours

Secondary Outcomes (4)

  • Breathing

    Measurements will be made during the stay in the recovery room for an average period of 3 hours

  • Post-operative Pain

    measurements are made in the recovery room following surgery for an average prior of 1 hour

  • Postoperative Sedation Score

    Measurements will be made during the stay in the operating room for an average period of 3 hours

  • Nausea and Vomiting

    Measurements will be made during the stay in the operating room for an average period of 3 hours

Study Arms (2)

Deep surgical block

EXPERIMENTAL

Continuous rocuronium infusion will be used to induce a deep surgical block with post tetanic twitch count of max 2. Rocuronium loading dose = 1.0 mg/kg, followed by 0.6-1.0 mg/kg per hour.

Drug: Surgical block (rocuronium; atracurium/mivacurium)

Moderate/normal surgical block

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

A normal block will be induced by an atracurium bolus dose followed by a mivacurium infusion to induce a train of four count of 1-2.

Drug: Surgical block (rocuronium; atracurium/mivacurium)

Interventions

The surgical block will be varied by either induction of a deep block (via rocuronium infusion) or a moderate/normal block (using atracurium/mivacurium infusion)

Also known as: deep muscle blockade
Deep surgical block

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Patients diagnosed with renal or prostatic disease who are will undergo an elective laparoscopic renal surgical procedure or laparoscopic prostatectomy;
  • ASA class I-III
  • \> 18 years of age;
  • Ability to give oral and written informed consent

You may not qualify if:

  • Known or suspected neuromuscular disorders impairing neuromuscular function;
  • Allergies to muscle relaxants, anesthetics or narcotics;
  • A (family) history of malignant hyperthermia;
  • Patients who have a contraindication for neostigmine administration;
  • Women who are or may be pregnant or are currently breast feeding;
  • Renal insufficiency, as defined by serum creatinine x 2 of normal, or urine output \< 0.5 ml/kg/h for at least 6 h. When available, other indices will be taken into account as well such as glomerular filtration rate \< 60 ml/h and proteinuria (a ratio of 30 mg albumin to 1 g of creatinine).
  • Previous retroperitoneal surgery at the site of the current surgery.
  • Body mass index \> 35 kg/m2

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Leiden University Medical Center

Leiden, South Holland, 2333 ZA, Netherlands

Location

Related Publications (1)

  • Boon M, Martini CH, Aarts LP, Bevers RF, Dahan A. Effect of variations in depth of neuromuscular blockade on rating of surgical conditions by surgeon and anesthesiologist in patients undergoing laparoscopic renal or prostatic surgery (BLISS trial): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials. 2013 Mar 1;14:63. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-14-63.

Related Links

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Prostatic HyperplasiaKidney Diseases

Interventions

RocuroniumAtracuriumMivacurium

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Prostatic DiseasesGenital Diseases, MaleGenital DiseasesUrogenital DiseasesMale Urogenital DiseasesUrologic DiseasesFemale Urogenital DiseasesFemale Urogenital Diseases and Pregnancy Complications

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

AndrostanolsAndrostanesSteroidsFused-Ring CompoundsPolycyclic CompoundsBenzylisoquinolinesIsoquinolinesHeterocyclic Compounds, 2-RingHeterocyclic Compounds, Fused-RingHeterocyclic Compounds

Results Point of Contact

Title
Dr. Albert Dahan
Organization
Leiden University Medical center

Study Officials

  • Albert Dahan, MD {hD

    LUMC

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
No
Restrictive Agreement
No

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 4
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
DOUBLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR
Purpose
PREVENTION
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Professor

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

June 19, 2012

First Posted

June 28, 2012

Study Start

June 1, 2012

Primary Completion

March 1, 2013

Study Completion

March 1, 2013

Last Updated

October 17, 2016

Results First Posted

October 17, 2016

Record last verified: 2016-08

Locations