Comparison of the Bilateral TAP Block Versus Curare in Muscle Relaxation of the Abdominal Wall During Laparoscopic Digestive Surgery: Prospective Randomized Study
Comparison of the Bilateral Transversus Abdominis Plane (TAP) Block Versus Curare in Muscle Relaxation of the Abdominal Wall During Laparoscopic Digestive Surgery: Prospective Randomized Study
2 other identifiers
interventional
60
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This is a Biomedical Research, prospective, randomized, controlled single-blind mono centric, phase IV comparison trial of the bilateral TAP block versus curare in muscle relaxation of the abdominal wall during laparoscopic digestive surgery.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for phase_4
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
June 1, 2012
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
June 25, 2012
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
June 27, 2012
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
January 1, 2013
CompletedNovember 19, 2025
November 1, 2025
7 months
June 25, 2012
November 17, 2025
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Muscle relaxation.
Muscle relaxation of the abdominal wall will be evaluated based on the amount of volume infused initially to create the pneumoperitoneum. This parameter is given by the unit of laparoscopy and allow us to calculate the abdominal compliance (C = ΔV / Ap).
20 minutes after anesthesia induction
Study Arms (2)
TAP
EXPERIMENTALcurare
ACTIVE COMPARATORPatients will be randomized into two parallel groups. One group will receive curare, another benefit of a bilateral TAP block
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patients older than 18 years and under 75 years
- Informed consent signed
- ASA I, II and III
- Patient affiliated to social security
You may not qualify if:
- ASA IV
- BMI\> 35 kg / m
- Personal or family history of malignant hyperthermia
- History of allergy or hypersensitivity to intravenous anesthetics (remifentanil), local anesthetics or muscle relaxants
- Contraindications to sevoflurane: a history of malignant hyperthermia, history of liver disease after sevoflurane anesthesia, halogenated agents or hypersensitivity to any of these components.
- Contraindications to succinylcholine: hyperkalemia, plasma cholinesterase deficiency nickname, para or tetraplegia more than 24 hours, burns over 24
- Contraindications to cisatracurium: myasthenia
- Neuromuscular diseases
- Contraindications to local anesthetics: hypersensitivity to local anesthetics of the amide, intravenous regional anesthesia, porphyria, ventricular atrial conduction disturbances, epilepsy uncontrolled by treatment
- Pregnancy and lactation
- severe coagulation disorders
- Inability to understand and give informed consent
- Patient under guardianship, curatorship or protected
- Indication of use of a hypnotic ketamine (BIS change)
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
CHU Amiens
Amiens, Picardie, 80054, France
Related Publications (1)
From the American Association of Neurological Surgeons (AANS), American Society of Neuroradiology (ASNR), Cardiovascular and Interventional Radiology Society of Europe (CIRSE), Canadian Interventional Radiology Association (CIRA), Congress of Neurological Surgeons (CNS), European Society of Minimally Invasive Neurological Therapy (ESMINT), European Society of Neuroradiology (ESNR), European Stroke Organization (ESO), Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions (SCAI), Society of Interventional Radiology (SIR), Society of NeuroInterventional Surgery (SNIS), and World Stroke Organization (WSO); Sacks D, Baxter B, Campbell BCV, Carpenter JS, Cognard C, Dippel D, Eesa M, Fischer U, Hausegger K, Hirsch JA, Shazam Hussain M, Jansen O, Jayaraman MV, Khalessi AA, Kluck BW, Lavine S, Meyers PM, Ramee S, Rufenacht DA, Schirmer CM, Vorwerk D. Multisociety Consensus Quality Improvement Revised Consensus Statement for Endovascular Therapy of Acute Ischemic Stroke. Int J Stroke. 2018 Aug;13(6):612-632. doi: 10.1177/1747493018778713. Epub 2018 May 22. No abstract available.
PMID: 29786478RESULT
MeSH Terms
Interventions
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Hervé DUPONT, PU-PH
CHU Amiens France
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 4
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- INVESTIGATOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
June 25, 2012
First Posted
June 27, 2012
Study Start
June 1, 2012
Primary Completion
January 1, 2013
Last Updated
November 19, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-11