NCT01626612

Brief Summary

Rational: Severe sepsis is one of the leading cause of mortality in intensive care unit patients. Early initiation of an appropriate empirical antimicrobial therapy is associated with improved outcomes. In order to avoid an increase of selection pressure and the emergence of multidrug resistant pathogens, guidelines recommend to streamline the antimicrobial therapy after the identification of the pathogen responsible for infection. This strategy has been evaluated in several observational studies. However, at the bedside, few randomized clinical trials tested this strategy prospectively. Method: the investigators conduct a randomized clinical trial comparing a strategy based on de-escalation (streamlining of the empirical antimicrobial therapy) and a conservative strategy (continuation of the empirical antimicrobial therapy). The investigators first aim was to show that a strategy based on de-escalation is not inferior to a conservative strategy in terms of intensive care unit length of stay. Secondary aims are to compare the rate of mortality rate, the emergence of multidrug resistant pathogens, and the feasibility of de-escalation. The study is performed in nine intensive care units from four institutions, and 120 patients are required to validate the investigators hypothesis. New technologies for the rapid diagnosis of severe infections are investigated in an ancillary study.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
120

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for phase_3

Timeline
Completed

Started Feb 2012

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

February 1, 2012

Completed
4 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

June 4, 2012

Completed
21 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

June 25, 2012

Completed
9 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

April 1, 2013

Completed
3 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

July 1, 2013

Completed
Last Updated

May 7, 2026

Status Verified

April 1, 2015

Enrollment Period

1.2 years

First QC Date

June 4, 2012

Last Update Submit

May 4, 2026

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • the length of stay

    he deadline in days sold enters the diagnosis of sepsis engrave or toxic shock and the exit of resuscitation.

    24 months

Secondary Outcomes (4)

  • Mortality in resuscitation

    24 months

  • Lasted treatment antibiotic

    24 MONTHS

  • Lasted mechanical ventilation(breakdown)

    24 months

  • Lasted administration of catécholamines

    24 months

Study Arms (2)

a strategy based on de-escalation

EXPERIMENTAL
Procedure: streamlining of the empirical antimicrobial therapy

a conservative strategy

ACTIVE COMPARATOR
Procedure: continuation of the empirical antimicrobial therapy

Interventions

ALL THE ANTIBACTERIAL IN WORN SYSTEMATIC

a conservative strategy

ALL THE ANTIBACTERIAL IN WORN SYSTEMATIC

a strategy based on de-escalation

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Major Subject;
  • Subject having a sepsis engraves(burns) defined according to the following criteria during the initiation of the probability antibiotic treatment:
  • Criteria of SIRS \[ 14 \],
  • And a suspected infection,
  • And a failure of organ: low blood pressure, respiratory failure, coma, hepatic insufficiency, renal insufficiency, thrombopénia, spontaneous extension of the TCA,
  • Subject for which an antibiotic treatment was begun within 6 hours following the diagnosis of sepsis engraves(burns);
  • Subject for which a taking with microbiological aim was made within 48 hours following the diagnosis of sepsis

You may not qualify if:

  • Minor Subject, pregnant or breast-feeding woman;
  • Neutropénia (PN \< 1000 / mm3);
  • Absence of identification of a microorganism in the microbiological examinations;
  • Absence of Social Security;
  • Subject deprived of freedom or under guardianship;
  • Subject for which the lit(enlightened) consent is not collected(taken in) (itself and/or reliable person).

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Assistance Publique Hopitaux de Marseille

Marseille, 13354, France

Location

Related Publications (1)

  • Leone M, Bechis C, Baumstarck K, Lefrant JY, Albanese J, Jaber S, Lepape A, Constantin JM, Papazian L, Bruder N, Allaouchiche B, Bezulier K, Antonini F, Textoris J, Martin C; AZUREA Network Investigators. De-escalation versus continuation of empirical antimicrobial treatment in severe sepsis: a multicenter non-blinded randomized noninferiority trial. Intensive Care Med. 2014 Oct;40(10):1399-408. doi: 10.1007/s00134-014-3411-8. Epub 2014 Aug 5.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Sepsis

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

InfectionsSystemic Inflammatory Response SyndromeInflammationPathologic ProcessesPathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms

Study Officials

  • BERNARD BELAIGUES

    Assistance Publique hôpitaux de Marseille

    STUDY DIRECTOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 3
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

June 4, 2012

First Posted

June 25, 2012

Study Start

February 1, 2012

Primary Completion

April 1, 2013

Study Completion

July 1, 2013

Last Updated

May 7, 2026

Record last verified: 2015-04

Locations