Use of ACUPUNCTURE in Emergency Departement
Acupuncture Versus Intravenous Morphine in the Management of Acute Pain in Emergency Department (ED)
1 other identifier
interventional
300
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Pain is the most common reason that patients present to an emergency department (ED) and is often inadequately managed. Evidence suggests that acupuncture is effective for pain relief, yet it is rarely practiced in the ED. In 1998, a United States National Institute of Health Consensus Conference Panel reviewed the status of acupuncture and concluded that: "There is sufficient evidence of acupuncture's value to expand its use into conventional medicine and to encourage further studies of its physiology and clinical value." Similarly, in 2002, the World Health Organisation (WHO) stated that acupuncture is a safe, simple and convenient therapy and that its effectiveness as analgesia has been established in controlled clinical studies. Notwithstanding these difficulties, it has been shown that acupuncture analgesia in the treatment of chronic pain is comparable to morphine and that its better safety profile and lack of dependence makes it the preferred method of choice for these conditions. There are very few clinical trials of acupuncture for acute pain to inform clinical practice; that's why we have the idea to do this study in our emergency department.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Apr 2012
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
April 1, 2012
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
June 15, 2012
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
June 19, 2012
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
March 1, 2013
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 1, 2013
CompletedJanuary 30, 2020
January 1, 2020
11 months
June 15, 2012
January 28, 2020
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
analgisia effect of acupuncture
subjuctive outcome
one year
Secondary Outcomes (1)
use of acupuncture in emergency departement
one year
Study Arms (2)
acupuncture
ACTIVE COMPARATORInclusion criteria: Traumatic and non traumatic acute pain with visual analog pain scale ( VAPS) \> 40 (on a scale 0-100) Age ≥18 years Presigned consentement to participate in the study. Exclusion criteria: Temperature \> 37.7° C, Anticoagulation medication use or the presence of a mechanical heart valve, Skin infections that would preclude certain acupuncture points being used, Refusal, inability to consent or communication difficulties, Acute major trauma, Any form of analgesia up to 60 minutes prior to study start, An initial pain score ≤ 40 on the pain scale (score range 0-100), Opiate contraindication, Pregnancy, Presentation to the ED \> 4 times in the previous 3 months with the same condition.
morphine
SHAM COMPARATORdrug:5mg of morphine followed by intravenous administration of 2,5 mg morphine each 5 min, until VAPS becomes \<30%.
Interventions
-Group Acupuncture: Receiving protocol of acupuncture. Acupuncture is performed by a trained certificied resident. The protocols, which allow acupuncture points to be selected from a pool of pre-determined points for each condition, provide sufficient standardization to assist replication, yet are flexible enough to allow individualized treatments. These protocols also allow for additional points, such as 'ashi points', to be used at the discretion of the acupuncturist. The location of the points, angle of insertion and depth of insertion were sourced from a popular text 'A Manual of Acupuncture'. -Group Morphine: Receiving 5mg of morphine followed by intravenous administration of 2,5 mg morphine each 5 min, until VAPS becomes \<30%. Treatment failure is defined as VAPS\>30 %, 30min after beginning of the protocol. In this case, analgesic treatment was administered according to the treating physician discretion.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Traumatic and non traumatic acute (\<72 hours) musculoskeletal pain with visual analog pain scale ( VAS or NRS ) \> 40 (on a scale 0-100)
- Age ≥18 years
- Presigned consentement to participate in the study.
- no evidence of fracture or dislocation, including ankle and knee sprains without signs of severity (ligament rupture, laxity); shoulder and elbow tendonitis; upper and lower limb mechanical pains and lower back pain with no evidence of neurological deficit; acute abdominal pain with no urgent surgical intervention including renal colic and dysmenorrhea; and acute headache .
You may not qualify if:
- Temperature \> 37.7° C,
- Anticoagulation medication use or the presence of a mechanical heart valve,
- Skin infections that would preclude certain acupuncture points being used,
- Refusal, inability to consent or communication difficulties,
- Acute major trauma,
- Any form of analgesia up to 60 minutes prior to study start,
- An initial pain score ≤ 40 on the pain scale (score range 0-100),
- Opiate contraindication,
- Pregnancy,
- Presentation to the ED \> 4 times in the previous 3 months with the same condition.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Emergency Departement
Monastir, 5000, Tunisia
Related Publications (1)
MacPherson H, White A, Cummings M, Jobst K, Rose K, Niemtzow R; STandards for Reporting Interventions in Controlled Trails of Acupuncture. Standards for reporting interventions in controlled trials of acupuncture: The STRICTA recommendations. STandards for Reporting Interventions in Controlled Trails of Acupuncture. Acupunct Med. 2002 Mar;20(1):22-5. doi: 10.1136/aim.20.1.22.
PMID: 11926601BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
nouira semir, MD
University of Monastir
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
June 15, 2012
First Posted
June 19, 2012
Study Start
April 1, 2012
Primary Completion
March 1, 2013
Study Completion
June 1, 2013
Last Updated
January 30, 2020
Record last verified: 2020-01