NCT01613131

Brief Summary

Hormonal treatment of perimenopausal women has frequently utilized oral contraceptive pills (OCPs). Because of their ability to suppress ovulation and establish cycle control, OCPs have become a popular option, and one that is FDA approved for use until menopause. However, use of OCPs in women in their 40's and 50's carries significant cardiovascular risks. Venous thromboembolism risk is 3-6 fold greater in OCP users, and the risk of myocardial infarction (MI) is approximately doubled in OCP users over the age of 40. This occurs at an age where the background population risk of MI begins to increase, such that the absolute number of cases rises substantially. Women with additional risk factors for cardiovascular disease have a much greater risk for MI (6-40-fold) in association with OCPs. There are also large subgroups of midlife women who are not candidates for OCP use, such a smokers and migraineurs. Moreover, the trend towards lower estrogen dosing with OCPs containing 20 micrograms of ethinyl estradiol has not led to a detectable decrease in thromboembolic risk. Because of their increased potential risks, it is appropriate to seek alternatives to OCPs and to explore lower doses of hormones to relieve perimenopausal symptoms that occur prior to a woman's final menses. Recent evidence indicates that the hypothalamic-pituitary axis of reproductively aging women is more susceptible to suppression by sex steroids that previously believed. It is possible that hormone doses as low as 50 micrograms of transdermal estradiol (TDE) can suppress the hypothalamic-pituitary axis of midlife women. It is also tempting to speculate that the low but measurable circulating doses of levonorgestrel that are present when a woman uses the Mirena intrauterine system (IUS) can contribute to or even independently suppress the hypothalamic-pituitary axis, and reduce the hormonal fluctuations that result in worsening of perimenopausal symptoms. The combination of low dose TDE plus Mirena may therefore confer superior symptom control as well as contraceptive effectiveness, at far less risk.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
39

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Apr 2012

Typical duration for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

April 1, 2012

Completed
2 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

June 4, 2012

Completed
2 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

June 6, 2012

Completed
2 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

June 1, 2014

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

June 1, 2014

Completed
1.5 years until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

December 2, 2015

Completed
Last Updated

December 2, 2015

Status Verified

October 1, 2015

Enrollment Period

2.2 years

First QC Date

June 4, 2012

Results QC Date

August 11, 2015

Last Update Submit

October 29, 2015

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (12)

  • Hot Flashes

    The Hot Flash Related Daily Interference Scale (HFRDIS) is a ten item scale measuring degree to which hot flashes interfere with 9 daily activities (work, social, leisure, sleep, mood, concentration, relations, sexuality, enjoyment of life, overall quality of life) over the prior week, each scored on a 10 point Likert scale. The total score is reported, and scores range from 0-100, 100 being the worst outcome.

    Day 0

  • Sleep

    The Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) is a 19-item scale designed to measure general sleep disturbances over the previous month (sleep wake patterns, duration of sleep, sleep latency, impact of poor sleep on daytime functioning, assesses specific problems contributing to poor sleep, including pain, urination, breathing difficulty, snoring, dreams, temperature). The global score is reported and ranges from 1-21, with higher scores being indicative of poorer sleep.

    Day 0

  • Depression

    The Center for Epidemiologic Studies-Depression Scale (CES-D) is a 20-item scale with 4-point Likert responses indicating frequency of symptoms over past week. Scores range from 0-60, with scores \>16 considered indicative of depressive symptoms.

    Day 0

  • Fatigue

    The Fatigue Severity Scale (FSS) was used to determine the degree to which night-time sleep difficulty manifested as daytime sleepiness. The FSS is a 9-item scale assessing fatigue over the past week, on a 7-point Likert scale (ranging from 1-7). It is scored by averaging the individual item scores, with higher scores indicating greater fatigue. Scores greater than or equal to 5.5 are generally indicative of insomnia with impaired daytime functioning.

    Day 0

  • Sleep

    The Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) is a 19-item scale designed to measure general sleep disturbances over the previous month (sleep wake patterns, duration of sleep, sleep latency, impact of poor sleep on daytime functioning, assesses specific problems contributing to poor sleep, including pain, urination, breathing difficulty, snoring, dreams, temperature). The global score is reported and ranges from 1-21, with higher scores being indicative of poorer sleep.

    Day 90

  • Sleep

    The Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) is a 19-item scale designed to measure general sleep disturbances over the previous month (sleep wake patterns, duration of sleep, sleep latency, impact of poor sleep on daytime functioning, assesses specific problems contributing to poor sleep, including pain, urination, breathing difficulty, snoring, dreams, temperature). The global score is reported and ranges from 1-21, with higher scores being indicative of poorer sleep.

    Day 140

  • Hot Flashes

    The Hot Flash Related Daily Interference Scale (HFRDIS) is a ten item scale measuring degree to which hot flashes interfere with 9 daily activities (work, social, leisure, sleep, mood, concentration, relations, sexuality, enjoyment of life, overall quality of life) over the prior week, each scored on a 10 point Likert scale. The total score is reported, and scores range from 0-100, 100 being the worst outcome.

    Day 90

  • Hot Flashes

    The Hot Flash Related Daily Interference Scale (HFRDIS) is a ten item scale measuring degree to which hot flashes interfere with 9 daily activities (work, social, leisure, sleep, mood, concentration, relations, sexuality, enjoyment of life, overall quality of life) over the prior week, each scored on a 10 point Likert scale. The total score is reported, and scores range from 0-100, 100 being the worst outcome.

    Day 140

  • Depression

    The Center for Epidemiologic Studies-Depression Scale (CES-D) is a 20-item scale with 4-point Likert responses indicating frequency of symptoms over past week. Scores range from 0-60, with scores \>16 considered indicative of depressive symptoms.

    Day 90

  • Depression

    The Center for Epidemiologic Studies-Depression Scale (CES-D) is a 20-item scale with 4-point Likert responses indicating frequency of symptoms over past week. Scores range from 0-60, with scores \>16 considered indicative of depressive symptoms.

    Day 140

  • Fatigue

    The Fatigue Severity Scale (FSS) was used to determine the degree to which night-time sleep difficulty manifested as daytime sleepiness. The FSS is a 9-item scale assessing fatigue over the past week, on a 7-point Likert scale (ranging from 1-7). It is scored by averaging the individual item scores, with higher scores indicating greater fatigue. Scores greater than or equal to 5.5 are generally indicative of insomnia with impaired daytime functioning.

    Day 90

  • Fatigue

    The Fatigue Severity Scale (FSS) was used to determine the degree to which night-time sleep difficulty manifested as daytime sleepiness. The FSS is a 9-item scale assessing fatigue over the past week, on a 7-point Likert scale (ranging from 1-7). It is scored by averaging the individual item scores, with higher scores indicating greater fatigue. Scores greater than or equal to 5.5 are generally indicative of insomnia with impaired daytime functioning.

    Day 140

Study Arms (2)

Mirena + Estradiol Gel

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Subjects will be assigned to use of Estradiol gel for use with Mirena.

Drug: MirenaDrug: Estradiol

Mirena + Placebo Gel

PLACEBO COMPARATOR

Subjects will be assigned to use of placebo gel for use with Mirena.

Drug: MirenaDrug: Placebo Gel

Interventions

MirenaDRUG

Mirena (levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system), 52 mg (20 mcg/day), 5 year duration (study duration 6 months).

Also known as: IUD
Mirena + Estradiol GelMirena + Placebo Gel

Topical, .06%, Applied once daily for 50 days.

Also known as: TDE
Mirena + Estradiol Gel

Topical Gel, Applied once daily for 50 days, Placebo comparator.

Also known as: placebo
Mirena + Placebo Gel

Eligibility Criteria

Age40 Years - 52 Years
Sexfemale
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64)

You may qualify if:

  • Age 40-52
  • History of regular menstrual cycles every 20-35 days in mid-reproductive life (20-35 years of age)
  • At least 1 period within the past 3 months
  • BMI less than 35 kg/m2
  • Presence of at least one of the following perimenopausal symptoms:
  • Hot flashes (vasomotor symptoms)
  • Cyclical headache, bloating or adverse mood
  • Self-reported poor quality of sleep

You may not qualify if:

  • Age \< 40 years
  • Hysterectomy or bilateral oophorectomy
  • Cigarette smoking
  • Signs or symptoms of restless leg syndrome or sleep apnea
  • Any chronic renal or hepatic disease that might interfere with excretion of gonadotropins or sex steroids
  • Moderate/vigorous aerobic exercise \> 4 hours per week
  • Inability to read/write English
  • Pregnant Women
  • Prisoners
  • Decisionally challenged subjects
  • Any medical condition that makes use of Topical estradiol or Mirena contraindicated.
  • Sex hormone use within the past 30 days
  • History of cancer, blood clots or blood clotting disorder

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

University of Colorado

Aurora, Colorado, 80045, United States

Location

MeSH Terms

Interventions

LevonorgestrelEstradiolDichlorodiphenyldichloroethane

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

NorgestrelNorpregnenesNorpregnanesNorsteroidsSteroidsFused-Ring CompoundsPolycyclic CompoundsEstrenesEstranesEstradiol CongenersGonadal Steroid HormonesGonadal HormonesHormonesHormones, Hormone Substitutes, and Hormone AntagonistsHydrocarbons, ChlorinatedHydrocarbons, HalogenatedHydrocarbonsOrganic Chemicals

Limitations and Caveats

The main limitation was the sample size, which is consistent with a pilot study, and which can only inform the design of future research.

Results Point of Contact

Title
Chanel Mansfield
Organization
University of Colorado Denver

Study Officials

  • Nanette Santoro, MD

    University of Colorado, Denver

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
No
Restrictive Agreement
No

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
QUADRUPLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

June 4, 2012

First Posted

June 6, 2012

Study Start

April 1, 2012

Primary Completion

June 1, 2014

Study Completion

June 1, 2014

Last Updated

December 2, 2015

Results First Posted

December 2, 2015

Record last verified: 2015-10

Locations