Mirena and Estrogen for Control of Perimenopause Symptoms and Ovulation Suppression
Effectiveness of Perimenopausal Hormone Therapy in Suppression of Ovulation, Stabilization of Reproductive Hormones and Symptom Control
1 other identifier
interventional
39
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Hormonal treatment of perimenopausal women has frequently utilized oral contraceptive pills (OCPs). Because of their ability to suppress ovulation and establish cycle control, OCPs have become a popular option, and one that is FDA approved for use until menopause. However, use of OCPs in women in their 40's and 50's carries significant cardiovascular risks. Venous thromboembolism risk is 3-6 fold greater in OCP users, and the risk of myocardial infarction (MI) is approximately doubled in OCP users over the age of 40. This occurs at an age where the background population risk of MI begins to increase, such that the absolute number of cases rises substantially. Women with additional risk factors for cardiovascular disease have a much greater risk for MI (6-40-fold) in association with OCPs. There are also large subgroups of midlife women who are not candidates for OCP use, such a smokers and migraineurs. Moreover, the trend towards lower estrogen dosing with OCPs containing 20 micrograms of ethinyl estradiol has not led to a detectable decrease in thromboembolic risk. Because of their increased potential risks, it is appropriate to seek alternatives to OCPs and to explore lower doses of hormones to relieve perimenopausal symptoms that occur prior to a woman's final menses. Recent evidence indicates that the hypothalamic-pituitary axis of reproductively aging women is more susceptible to suppression by sex steroids that previously believed. It is possible that hormone doses as low as 50 micrograms of transdermal estradiol (TDE) can suppress the hypothalamic-pituitary axis of midlife women. It is also tempting to speculate that the low but measurable circulating doses of levonorgestrel that are present when a woman uses the Mirena intrauterine system (IUS) can contribute to or even independently suppress the hypothalamic-pituitary axis, and reduce the hormonal fluctuations that result in worsening of perimenopausal symptoms. The combination of low dose TDE plus Mirena may therefore confer superior symptom control as well as contraceptive effectiveness, at far less risk.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Apr 2012
Typical duration for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
April 1, 2012
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
June 4, 2012
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
June 6, 2012
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 1, 2014
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 1, 2014
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
December 2, 2015
CompletedDecember 2, 2015
October 1, 2015
2.2 years
June 4, 2012
August 11, 2015
October 29, 2015
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (12)
Hot Flashes
The Hot Flash Related Daily Interference Scale (HFRDIS) is a ten item scale measuring degree to which hot flashes interfere with 9 daily activities (work, social, leisure, sleep, mood, concentration, relations, sexuality, enjoyment of life, overall quality of life) over the prior week, each scored on a 10 point Likert scale. The total score is reported, and scores range from 0-100, 100 being the worst outcome.
Day 0
Sleep
The Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) is a 19-item scale designed to measure general sleep disturbances over the previous month (sleep wake patterns, duration of sleep, sleep latency, impact of poor sleep on daytime functioning, assesses specific problems contributing to poor sleep, including pain, urination, breathing difficulty, snoring, dreams, temperature). The global score is reported and ranges from 1-21, with higher scores being indicative of poorer sleep.
Day 0
Depression
The Center for Epidemiologic Studies-Depression Scale (CES-D) is a 20-item scale with 4-point Likert responses indicating frequency of symptoms over past week. Scores range from 0-60, with scores \>16 considered indicative of depressive symptoms.
Day 0
Fatigue
The Fatigue Severity Scale (FSS) was used to determine the degree to which night-time sleep difficulty manifested as daytime sleepiness. The FSS is a 9-item scale assessing fatigue over the past week, on a 7-point Likert scale (ranging from 1-7). It is scored by averaging the individual item scores, with higher scores indicating greater fatigue. Scores greater than or equal to 5.5 are generally indicative of insomnia with impaired daytime functioning.
Day 0
Sleep
The Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) is a 19-item scale designed to measure general sleep disturbances over the previous month (sleep wake patterns, duration of sleep, sleep latency, impact of poor sleep on daytime functioning, assesses specific problems contributing to poor sleep, including pain, urination, breathing difficulty, snoring, dreams, temperature). The global score is reported and ranges from 1-21, with higher scores being indicative of poorer sleep.
Day 90
Sleep
The Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) is a 19-item scale designed to measure general sleep disturbances over the previous month (sleep wake patterns, duration of sleep, sleep latency, impact of poor sleep on daytime functioning, assesses specific problems contributing to poor sleep, including pain, urination, breathing difficulty, snoring, dreams, temperature). The global score is reported and ranges from 1-21, with higher scores being indicative of poorer sleep.
Day 140
Hot Flashes
The Hot Flash Related Daily Interference Scale (HFRDIS) is a ten item scale measuring degree to which hot flashes interfere with 9 daily activities (work, social, leisure, sleep, mood, concentration, relations, sexuality, enjoyment of life, overall quality of life) over the prior week, each scored on a 10 point Likert scale. The total score is reported, and scores range from 0-100, 100 being the worst outcome.
Day 90
Hot Flashes
The Hot Flash Related Daily Interference Scale (HFRDIS) is a ten item scale measuring degree to which hot flashes interfere with 9 daily activities (work, social, leisure, sleep, mood, concentration, relations, sexuality, enjoyment of life, overall quality of life) over the prior week, each scored on a 10 point Likert scale. The total score is reported, and scores range from 0-100, 100 being the worst outcome.
Day 140
Depression
The Center for Epidemiologic Studies-Depression Scale (CES-D) is a 20-item scale with 4-point Likert responses indicating frequency of symptoms over past week. Scores range from 0-60, with scores \>16 considered indicative of depressive symptoms.
Day 90
Depression
The Center for Epidemiologic Studies-Depression Scale (CES-D) is a 20-item scale with 4-point Likert responses indicating frequency of symptoms over past week. Scores range from 0-60, with scores \>16 considered indicative of depressive symptoms.
Day 140
Fatigue
The Fatigue Severity Scale (FSS) was used to determine the degree to which night-time sleep difficulty manifested as daytime sleepiness. The FSS is a 9-item scale assessing fatigue over the past week, on a 7-point Likert scale (ranging from 1-7). It is scored by averaging the individual item scores, with higher scores indicating greater fatigue. Scores greater than or equal to 5.5 are generally indicative of insomnia with impaired daytime functioning.
Day 90
Fatigue
The Fatigue Severity Scale (FSS) was used to determine the degree to which night-time sleep difficulty manifested as daytime sleepiness. The FSS is a 9-item scale assessing fatigue over the past week, on a 7-point Likert scale (ranging from 1-7). It is scored by averaging the individual item scores, with higher scores indicating greater fatigue. Scores greater than or equal to 5.5 are generally indicative of insomnia with impaired daytime functioning.
Day 140
Study Arms (2)
Mirena + Estradiol Gel
ACTIVE COMPARATORSubjects will be assigned to use of Estradiol gel for use with Mirena.
Mirena + Placebo Gel
PLACEBO COMPARATORSubjects will be assigned to use of placebo gel for use with Mirena.
Interventions
Mirena (levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system), 52 mg (20 mcg/day), 5 year duration (study duration 6 months).
Topical Gel, Applied once daily for 50 days, Placebo comparator.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Age 40-52
- History of regular menstrual cycles every 20-35 days in mid-reproductive life (20-35 years of age)
- At least 1 period within the past 3 months
- BMI less than 35 kg/m2
- Presence of at least one of the following perimenopausal symptoms:
- Hot flashes (vasomotor symptoms)
- Cyclical headache, bloating or adverse mood
- Self-reported poor quality of sleep
You may not qualify if:
- Age \< 40 years
- Hysterectomy or bilateral oophorectomy
- Cigarette smoking
- Signs or symptoms of restless leg syndrome or sleep apnea
- Any chronic renal or hepatic disease that might interfere with excretion of gonadotropins or sex steroids
- Moderate/vigorous aerobic exercise \> 4 hours per week
- Inability to read/write English
- Pregnant Women
- Prisoners
- Decisionally challenged subjects
- Any medical condition that makes use of Topical estradiol or Mirena contraindicated.
- Sex hormone use within the past 30 days
- History of cancer, blood clots or blood clotting disorder
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- University of Colorado, Denverlead
- Bayercollaborator
Study Sites (1)
University of Colorado
Aurora, Colorado, 80045, United States
MeSH Terms
Interventions
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Limitations and Caveats
The main limitation was the sample size, which is consistent with a pilot study, and which can only inform the design of future research.
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Chanel Mansfield
- Organization
- University of Colorado Denver
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Nanette Santoro, MD
University of Colorado, Denver
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restrictive Agreement
- No
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- QUADRUPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
June 4, 2012
First Posted
June 6, 2012
Study Start
April 1, 2012
Primary Completion
June 1, 2014
Study Completion
June 1, 2014
Last Updated
December 2, 2015
Results First Posted
December 2, 2015
Record last verified: 2015-10