Comparison of Two Techniques in Achieving Corneal Graft
Comparison of Manual and Automated Techniques in Achieving Posterior Lamellar Transplantation of the Cornea
2 other identifiers
interventional
40
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The cornea is a transparent membrane, half a millimeter thick, embedded as a window in front of the eye. When the eye becomes opaque, the eye is not seeing and the only way to restore the visual acuity is to replace the cornea by performing a graft (4000 surgeries per year in France). In half the cases the opacification of the cornea is secondary to dysfunction of the endothelium, cell layer of 15 μm thickness, covering its posterior surface, in charge of regulating the moisture of the corneal thickness and therefore its transparency. While the total corneal transplantation has long been the only intervention for these diseases, it is now possible, from 4-5 years, to replace only the very thin: it is called endothelial transplant or graft lamellar later. This intervention is now experiencing significant success as it reduces very significantly the incidence of complications found after transplantation of total cornea and the visual recovery period. This type of transplant is still difficult to achieve and the best technique is not yet established. Indeed, posterior lamellar transplantation of the cornea may be done manually or using an automated device. Manual techniques allow the preparation of grafts extremely thin but are difficult to achieve while the automatic techniques, easier, prepare thicker grafts that may be less efficient in visual recovery. The aim of this project is to conduct a prospective study in order to compare these two techniques in terms of postoperative visual recovery and the vitality of the graft during the first year. To date, there is no such study. The department of Ophthalmology in the University Hospital of Rouen is one of the most famous French teams in the field of cornea transplants and receives many patients from different French regions. The recruitment of 40 patients needed to study should be done without great difficulty over a period of 18 months.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Jun 2012
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
April 25, 2012
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
June 1, 2012
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
June 4, 2012
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
August 1, 2016
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
August 1, 2016
CompletedOctober 10, 2016
October 1, 2016
4.2 years
April 25, 2012
October 7, 2016
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Measurement of visual acuity
1 year
Secondary Outcomes (5)
Occular hypertension
Day 7, Day 15, Month 1, Month 2, Month 6, 1 year
Measurement of visual acuity
Month 1, Month 2, Month 6
Partial or complete graft detachment
Day 7, Day 15, Month 1, Month 2, Month 6, 1 year
Necessity of air injection
Day 7, Day 15, Month 1, Month 2, Month 6, 1 year
Defeat of the graft
Day 7, Day 15, Month 1, Month 2, Month 6, 1 year
Study Arms (2)
Manual preparation
EXPERIMENTALManual preparation of the graft
Automatized preparation
ACTIVE COMPARATORAutomatized preparation of the graft with microkeratoma
Interventions
Standard Endothelial descemet membrane graft
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- men and woman
- years old or more
- Patient having been informed about the study and having signed a non-opposition to the participation
You may not qualify if:
- Patient presenting an associated eye pathology previously known and able to limit the visual recovery (age-related macular degeneration, diabetic retinopathy, ...)
- Pregnant women, parturient or breast feeding
- refusal to participate in the study
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
UH Rouen
Rouen, 76031, France
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Marc MURAINE, Pr
UH Rouen
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
April 25, 2012
First Posted
June 4, 2012
Study Start
June 1, 2012
Primary Completion
August 1, 2016
Study Completion
August 1, 2016
Last Updated
October 10, 2016
Record last verified: 2016-10