High Dose Rate Prostate Brachytherapy: Dose Escalation to Dominant Intra-prostatic Nodule
Dosepainting
High Dose Rate Prostate (HDR) Brachytherapy Dose Escalation to Dominant Intra-prostatic Nodule for Patients With Intermediate and High Risk Prostate Cancer
1 other identifier
interventional
26
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This study will investigate the feasibility of using technology of ultrasound guided HDR brachytherapy to focally increase dose to regions within the prostate that are heavily infiltrated with cancer. Such regions, referred to as dominant intraprostatic lesions (DIL) can be visualized using diffusion contrast enhanced MRI employing an endo-rectal coil. The magnetic resonance (MR) images can be fused with the planning transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) prior to the brachytherapy procedure to design a dose distribution that will encompass the malignant volume with higher than the prescription dose. By its nature, brachytherapy has subvolumes that receive (for example)125% of the prescription dose or 150% of the prescription dose. With TRUS-guided and TRUS-planned HDR these areas can be manipulated to coincide with the DIL. The limit of dose escalation has been reached at whole prostate external beam doses of 81-86 Gy and still failure rates for intermediate and high risk disease are unacceptable. There is much interest in focal dose escalation and TRUS-guided HDR brachytherapy is perfectly suited to achieving this.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable prostate-cancer
Started May 2012
Longer than P75 for not_applicable prostate-cancer
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
May 1, 2012
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
May 22, 2012
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
May 24, 2012
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
July 1, 2013
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
July 1, 2018
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
July 16, 2021
CompletedJuly 21, 2021
August 1, 2017
1.2 years
May 22, 2012
January 24, 2020
July 19, 2021
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Average Mean Dose to 90% of DIL Volume
Feasibility of dose escalation to a minimum dose of 125% of prescription to 90% of the dominant intra-porstatic lesion (DIL) volume as defined on multiparametric endo-rectal magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) without exceeding critical organ dose constraints (Urethral volume receiving 115%= 0, Dose to 1cc of rectal wall \< 7 Gy). 2 Fractions were performed and the mean dose to 90% of DIL volume was averaged.
12 months
Secondary Outcomes (2)
Acute Toxicity
24 months
Prostate Specific Antigen(PSA) Response at 5-years
5 years
Study Arms (1)
HDR interstitial brachytherapy
EXPERIMENTALHDR prostate brachytherapy with dose escalation to 1250 cGy to the MRI-defined dominant intraprostatic lesion
Interventions
2 treatments of 1000 cGy will be delivered to the entire prostate volume while escalating the dose to the visible disease to 1250 cGy
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- histologically proven adenocarcinoma of the prostate
- intermediate or high risk prostate cancer
- Intermediate risk prostate cancer patients must have:
- Clinical stage ≤ T2c,
- Gleason score = 7 and initial prostate specific antigen (iPSA) ≤ 20, or
- Gleason score ≤ 6 and iPSA \> 10 and ≤ 20.
- High risk patients may have
- Clinical stage T3
- Gleason score 8-10
- PSA \> 20 ng/ml
- fit for general anesthetic.
- unilateral disease with either a palpable nodule or a cluster of positive biopsies from a single region suggesting the presence of dominant nodule.
- estimated life expectancy of at least 10 years.
- Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 0 - 2.
- no contraindications to interstitial prostate brachytherapy.
- +2 more criteria
You may not qualify if:
- Does not meet staging criteria for intermediate or high risk prostate cancer
- Does not have a localized high volume of intraprostatic disease
- unfit for general anesthetic
- MRI contraindicated
- unable to stop blood thinners
- Life expectancy \< 10 years
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Cancer Center for the Southern Interior
Kelowna, British Columbia, V1Y5L3, Canada
Related Publications (4)
Groenendaal G, van den Berg CA, Korporaal JG, Philippens ME, Luijten PR, van Vulpen M, van der Heide UA. Simultaneous MRI diffusion and perfusion imaging for tumor delineation in prostate cancer patients. Radiother Oncol. 2010 May;95(2):185-90. doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2010.02.014. Epub 2010 Mar 16.
PMID: 20231041BACKGROUNDKim Y, Hsu IC, Lessard E, Kurhanewicz J, Noworolski SM, Pouliot J. Class solution in inverse planned HDR prostate brachytherapy for dose escalation of DIL defined by combined MRI/MRSI. Radiother Oncol. 2008 Jul;88(1):148-55. doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2007.11.024. Epub 2008 Feb 20.
PMID: 18083260BACKGROUNDPouliot J, Kim Y, Lessard E, Hsu IC, Vigneron DB, Kurhanewicz J. Inverse planning for HDR prostate brachytherapy used to boost dominant intraprostatic lesions defined by magnetic resonance spectroscopy imaging. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2004 Jul 15;59(4):1196-207. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2004.02.055.
PMID: 15234056BACKGROUNDDe Bari B, Daidone A, Alongi F. Is high dose rate brachytherapy reliable and effective treatment for prostate cancer patients? A review of the literature. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. 2015 Jun;94(3):360-70. doi: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2015.02.003. Epub 2015 Feb 17.
PMID: 25819287DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Dr Juanita Crook
- Organization
- BC Cancer
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Matthew Schmid, MSc
Medical Physicst
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restrictive Agreement
- No
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
May 22, 2012
First Posted
May 24, 2012
Study Start
May 1, 2012
Primary Completion
July 1, 2013
Study Completion
July 1, 2018
Last Updated
July 21, 2021
Results First Posted
July 16, 2021
Record last verified: 2017-08
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share