NCT01600300

Brief Summary

Hypothesis: external electrical stimulation of the retina with low level electrical currents improves visual acuity in subjects with age-related dry macular degeneration.

Trial Health

100
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
40

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for phase_1

Timeline
Completed

Started Aug 2002

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

August 1, 2002

Completed
1.7 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

April 1, 2004

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

April 1, 2004

Completed
8.1 years until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

May 14, 2012

Completed
3 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

May 17, 2012

Completed
Last Updated

May 17, 2012

Status Verified

May 1, 2012

Enrollment Period

1.7 years

First QC Date

May 14, 2012

Last Update Submit

May 15, 2012

Conditions

Keywords

Age-related macular degenerationelectrical stimulationrandomizeddouble blind

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Change in visual acuity

    Change in visual acuity as measured with ETDRS eye chart

    Day 5, Day 12

Study Arms (2)

Sham

PLACEBO COMPARATOR

Treatment with inactivate Tesmac device

Device: Sham Tesmac device

Tesmac

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Treatment with active Tesmac device

Device: Tesmac

Interventions

TesmacDEVICE

Subjects were treated twice daily for five consecutive days, followed by two days untreated, and then treated twice daily for five more consecutive days.

Also known as: Theramac
Tesmac

Treatment with inactivated Tesmac device on the same schedule as the group treated with the active Tesmac device.

Sham

Eligibility Criteria

Age50 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Diagnosis of Macular Degeneration, i.e., at least three, hard or soft drusen must be present there must be RPE changes (migration, clumping or atrophy) within the central 6mm of the retina.
  • As a prerequisite for entry into the study, all patients will have their diagnosis of dry AMD confirmed by an ophthalmologist via a retinal exam and Fluorescein Angiography will also determine whether or not the subject is a candidate for laser surgery. Only subjects who have AMD will be admitted to the study.
  • Both sexes are eligible.
  • The best-corrected visual acuity can be no better than 20/40 and no worse than 20/100 in the treated eyes.
  • Age greater than 50.
  • Subjects must be highly motivated, alert, oriented, mentally competent and able to understand and comply with the requirements of the study, abide by the restrictions, return for all required visits, and provide voluntary informed consent.
  • Both eyes of the subject must show no evidence of wet AMD. If one eye is wet and the fellow eye is dry, the subject will be excluded.

You may not qualify if:

  • Subjects with seizure disorders.
  • Subjects with additional eye-related diseases that have associated ongoing retinal bleeding.
  • Subjects with any implanted electrical device.
  • Subjects who have smoked, on average, more than half a pack of cigarettes per day during the last 5 years.
  • Subjects with known allergy to contrast dye.
  • Subjects who are in poor general health, have unstable diseases, are terminally ill, have a life expectancy of less than 12 months, are non-ambulatory or bedridden, live in a geographical location which would likely prevent regular attendance at study visits or are considered not suitable for participation by the investigator.
  • Subjects exposed to an investigational device or drug within the past 30 days or involved concurrently in other treatment clinical trials. Note: Subjects participating in studies investigating the natural progression of AMD may not participate in this trial.
  • Subjects unwilling to adhere to visit or examination schedules as described in the study protocol.
  • Subjects with a known history of alcoholism, drug abuse, psychosis, clinical evidence of depression, poor motivation, emotional or intellectual problems, or any other conditions which would likely limit validity of consent or appropriate responses to participate in the study or who are deemed unsuitable psychologically or physiologically for study participation by the investigator.
  • Any subject experiencing an acute stressor that, in the opinion of the investigator, might affect the course or treatment of AMD.
  • Anyone with diagnosis of malignant or poorly controlled glaucoma in the eye(s) that would be treated.
  • Anyone with diabetic retinopathy.
  • Anyone with a progressive corneal dystrophy in the eye(s) that would be treated.
  • Anyone with any noted chorio retinal disease (other than AMD) in the eye(s) that would be treated.
  • Anyone with a progressive nuclear cataract in the eye(s) that would be treated. Stable cortical cataract patients may be included. Any patient with an immature cataract, one in which scattered opacities are separated by clear zones, may be included in the study. All patients with mature, hypermature or morgagnian cataracts in the eye(s) that would be treated will be excluded. Patients with a grade 3 or grade 4 cataract in the eye(s) that would be treated will be excluded. Grade 1 and Grade 2 cataract patients may be included in this study.
  • +7 more criteria

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Macular Degeneration

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Retinal DegenerationRetinal DiseasesEye Diseases

Study Officials

  • Richard Beauchemin, MD

    WNC Eye Care Associates PA

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 1
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
QUADRUPLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

May 14, 2012

First Posted

May 17, 2012

Study Start

August 1, 2002

Primary Completion

April 1, 2004

Study Completion

April 1, 2004

Last Updated

May 17, 2012

Record last verified: 2012-05