NCT01599806

Brief Summary

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effects of Ceftazidime Avibactam compared to Doripenem for treating hospitalized patients with complicated urinary tract infections, including acute pyelonephritis

Trial Health

98
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
641

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for phase_3

Timeline
Completed

Started Oct 2012

Geographic Reach
17 countries

57 active sites

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

May 15, 2012

Completed
1 day until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

May 16, 2012

Completed
5 months until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

October 1, 2012

Completed
1.8 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

August 1, 2014

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

August 1, 2014

Completed
1.6 years until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

March 2, 2016

Completed
Last Updated

September 6, 2017

Status Verified

August 1, 2017

Enrollment Period

1.8 years

First QC Date

May 15, 2012

Results QC Date

November 4, 2015

Last Update Submit

August 31, 2017

Conditions

Keywords

Ceftazidime, Avibactam, Doripenem, Ciprofloxacin, sulfamethoxazole/trimethoprim, Anti-Infective Agents, Complicated Urinary Tract Infection,Acute Pyelonephritis

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (3)

  • Patient-reported Symptomatic Response at Day 5 (mMITT Analysis Set): Non-inferiority Hypothesis Test

    Number of patients with symptomatic resolution (or return to premorbid state) of UTI-specific symptoms except flank pain (frequency/urgency/dysuria/suprapubic pain) with resolution of or improvement in flank pain based on the patient-reported symptom assessment response at the Day 5 visit in the mMITT analysis set. The sponsor will conclude noninferiority if the lower limit of the 95% CI of difference (corresponding to a 97.5% 1-sided lower bound) is greater than -12.5% for both FDA coprimary outcome variables (symptomatic resolution at day 5 or favorable combined response at test of cure (TOC)).

    At Day 5 visit. Day 5 visit is based on 24 hour periods from the first dose date and time.

  • Combined Patient-reported Symptomatic and Microbiological Response at TOC (mMITT Analysis Set): Non-inferiority Hypothesis Test

    Number of patients with both a favorable per patient microbiological response and symptomatic resolution (or return to premorbid state) of all UTI-specific symptoms (frequency/urgency/dysuria/suprapubic pain/flank pain) based on the patient-reported symptom assessment response at the TOC visit in the mMITT analysis set. The sponsor will conclude noninferiority if the lower limit of the 95% CI of difference (corresponding to a 97.5% 1-sided lower bound) is greater than -12.5% for both FDA coprimary outcome variables (symptomatic resolution at day 5 or favorable combined response at test of cure (TOC)).

    At TOC visit. TOC visit is 21 to 25 days from Randomization.

  • Per-patient Microbiological Response at TOC (mMITT Analysis Set): Non-inferiority Hypothesis Test

    Number of patients with a favorable per patient microbiological response at TOC. The primary efficacy outcome variable for ROW is the proportion of patients with a favorable per-patient microbiological response at the TOC visit in the mMITT analysis set.

    At TOC visit. TOC visit is 21 to 25 days from Randomization.

Secondary Outcomes (60)

  • Per-patient Microbiological Response at EOT (IV) (mMITT Analysis Set)

    At EOT (IV) visit. EOT (IV) visit is Within 24 hours after completion of the last infusion of IV study therapy and on/before the first dose for oral study therapy

  • Per-patient Microbiological Response at LFU (mMITT Analysis Set)

    At LFU visit. LFU visit is 45 to 52 days from Randomization.

  • Per-patient Microbiological Response at EOT (IV) (ME at EOT (IV) Analysis Set)

    At EOT (IV) visit. EOT (IV) visit is Within 24 hours after completion of the last infusion of IV study therapy and on/before the first dose for oral study therapy

  • Per-patient Microbiological Response at TOC (ME at TOC Analysis Set)

    At TOC visit. TOC visit is 21 to 25 days from Randomization.

  • Per-patient Microbiological Response at LFU (ME at LFU Analysis Set)

    At LFU visit. LFU visit is 45 to 52 days from Randomization.

  • +55 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (2)

Ceftazidime - Avibactam ( CAZ-AVI)

EXPERIMENTAL

IV treatment

Drug: Ceftazidime - Avibactam ( CAZ-AVI)Drug: Either switch to oral therapy: 500 mg of Ciprofloxacin (oral)Drug: or switch to oral therapy: 800 mg/160 mg of sulfamethoxazole/trimethoprim (oral)

Doripenem

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

IV treatment

Drug: DoripenemDrug: Either switch to oral therapy: 500 mg of Ciprofloxacin (oral)Drug: or switch to oral therapy: 800 mg/160 mg of sulfamethoxazole/trimethoprim (oral)

Interventions

Ceftazidime 2000 mg and 500 mg of avibactam. Patients randomized to receive CAZ-AVI will receive an infusion of CAZ-AVI (2000 mg ceftazidime and 500 mg avibactam) every 8 hours administered by intravenous (IV) infusion in a volume of 100 mL at a constant rate over 120 minutes

Ceftazidime - Avibactam ( CAZ-AVI)

500 mg of Doripenem. Patients randomized to receive Doripenem will receive an infusion of Doripenem 500 mg every 8 hours administered by intravenous (IV) infusion in a volume of 100 mL at a constant rate over 60 minutes

Doripenem

Patients are eligible for oral switch after receiving 5 full days of IV therapy and have met protocol specified criteria for clinical improvement

Ceftazidime - Avibactam ( CAZ-AVI)Doripenem

Patients are eligible for oral switch after receiving 5 full days of IV therapy and have met protocol specified criteria for clinical improvement

Ceftazidime - Avibactam ( CAZ-AVI)Doripenem

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 90 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • to 90 years of age inclusive
  • Female patients can participate if they are surgically sterile or completed menopause or females capable of having children and agree not to attempt pregnancy while receiving IV study therapy and for a period of 7 days after
  • Has pyuria with \>/= 10 WBCs (white blood cell) and has a positive urine culture within 48 hours of enrollment containing \>/=10 to the fifth CFU (colony forming unit ) /ml of a recognized uropathogen known to be susceptible to IV study therapy (CAZ-AVI and doripenem)
  • Demonstrates either acute pyelonephritis or complicated lower UTI without pyelonephritis

You may not qualify if:

  • Urine pathogen is a Gram-positive pathogen or a uropathogen resistant to CAZ-AVI or doripenem
  • Patient's urine culture at study entry isolates more than 2 microorganisms regardless of colony count or patient has a confirmed fungal UTI
  • Patient is receiving hemodialysis or peritoneal dialysis or had a renal transplant
  • Patient is immunocompromised
  • Patient is considered unlikely to survive the 6- to 8-week study period or has a rapidly progressive or terminal illness including septic shock which is associated with a high risk of mortality

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (57)

Research Site

Detroit, Michigan, United States

Location

Research Site

St Louis, Missouri, United States

Location

Research Site

Indiana, Pennsylvania, United States

Location

Research Site

Rosario, Argentina

Location

Research Site

Pazardzhik, Bulgaria

Location

Research Site

Sofia, Bulgaria

Location

Research Site

Veliko Tarnovo, Bulgaria

Location

Research Site

Slavonski Brod, Croatia

Location

Research Site

Zadar, Croatia

Location

Research Site

Zagreb, Croatia

Location

Research Site

Liberec, Czechia

Location

Research Site

Prague, Czechia

Location

Research Site

Hamburg, Germany

Location

Research Site

Haifa, Israel

Location

Research Site

Kfar Saba, Israel

Location

Research Site

Modena, Italy

Location

Research Site

Cuernavaca, MOR, Mexico

Location

Research Site

Guadalajara, Mexico

Location

Research Site

Zapopan, Mexico

Location

Research Site

Arequipa, Peru

Location

Research Site

Cercardo de Lima, Peru

Location

Research Site

Cusco, Peru

Location

Research Site

Lima, Peru

Location

Research Site

Trujillo, Peru

Location

Research Site

Bialystok, Poland

Location

Research Site

Sochaczew, Poland

Location

Research Site

Wroclaw, Poland

Location

Research Site

Bucharest, Romania

Location

Research Site

Oradea, Romania

Location

Research Site

Sibiu, Romania

Location

Research Site

Timișoara, Romania

Location

Research Site

Moscow, Russia

Location

Research Site

Nizhny Novgorod, Russia

Location

Research Site

Novosibirsk, Russia

Location

Research Site

Saint Petersburg, Russia

Location

Research Site

Smolensk, Russia

Location

Research Site

Tomsk, Russia

Location

Research Site

Veliky Novgorod, Russia

Location

Research Site

Busan, South Korea

Location

Research Site

Jeonnam, South Korea

Location

Research Site

Seoul, South Korea

Location

Research Site

Alicante, Spain

Location

Research Site

Alzira (Valencia), Spain

Location

Research Site

Barcelona, Spain

Location

Research Site

Elche, Spain

Location

Research Site

Granada, Spain

Location

Research Site

Terrassa, Spain

Location

Research Site

Kaohsiung City, Taiwan

Location

Research Site

Taipei, Taiwan

Location

Research Site

Chernivtsi, Ukraine

Location

Research Site

Ivano-Frankivsk, Ukraine

Location

Research Site

Kharkiv, Ukraine

Location

Research Site

Kyiv, Ukraine

Location

Research Site

Lutsk, Ukraine

Location

Research Site

Simferopol, Ukraine

Location

Research Site

Vinnytsia, Ukraine

Location

Research Site

Zaporizhzhya, Ukraine

Location

Related Publications (6)

  • Torres A, Wible M, Tawadrous M, Irani P, Stone GG, Quintana A, Debabov D, Burroughs M, Bradford PA, Kollef M. Efficacy and safety of ceftazidime/avibactam in patients with infections caused by beta-lactamase-producing Gram-negative pathogens: a pooled analysis from the Phase 3 clinical trial programme. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2023 Nov 6;78(11):2672-2682. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkad280.

  • Cheng K, Newell P, Chow JW, Broadhurst H, Wilson D, Yates K, Wardman A. Safety Profile of Ceftazidime-Avibactam: Pooled Data from the Adult Phase II and Phase III Clinical Trial Programme. Drug Saf. 2020 Aug;43(8):751-766. doi: 10.1007/s40264-020-00934-3.

  • Li J, Lovern M, Green ML, Chiu J, Zhou D, Comisar C, Xiong Y, Hing J, MacPherson M, Wright JG, Riccobene T, Carrothers TJ, Das S. Ceftazidime-Avibactam Population Pharmacokinetic Modeling and Pharmacodynamic Target Attainment Across Adult Indications and Patient Subgroups. Clin Transl Sci. 2019 Mar;12(2):151-163. doi: 10.1111/cts.12585. Epub 2018 Sep 28.

  • Nichols WW, Stone GG, Newell P, Broadhurst H, Wardman A, MacPherson M, Yates K, Riccobene T, Critchley IA, Das S. Ceftazidime-Avibactam Susceptibility Breakpoints against Enterobacteriaceae and Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2018 Oct 24;62(11):e02590-17. doi: 10.1128/AAC.02590-17. Print 2018 Nov.

  • Stone GG, Newell P, Gasink LB, Broadhurst H, Wardman A, Yates K, Chen Z, Song J, Chow JW. Clinical activity of ceftazidime/avibactam against MDR Enterobacteriaceae and Pseudomonas aeruginosa: pooled data from the ceftazidime/avibactam Phase III clinical trial programme. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2018 Sep 1;73(9):2519-2523. doi: 10.1093/jac/dky204.

  • Wagenlehner FM, Sobel JD, Newell P, Armstrong J, Huang X, Stone GG, Yates K, Gasink LB. Ceftazidime-avibactam Versus Doripenem for the Treatment of Complicated Urinary Tract Infections, Including Acute Pyelonephritis: RECAPTURE, a Phase 3 Randomized Trial Program. Clin Infect Dis. 2016 Sep 15;63(6):754-762. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciw378. Epub 2016 Jun 16.

MeSH Terms

Interventions

avibactam, ceftazidime drug combinationDoripenemCiprofloxacinSulfamethoxazoleTrimethoprim

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Carbapenemsbeta-LactamsLactamsAmidesOrganic ChemicalsHeterocyclic Compounds, 2-RingHeterocyclic Compounds, Fused-RingHeterocyclic CompoundsFluoroquinolones4-QuinolonesQuinolonesQuinolinesBenzenesulfonamidesSulfonamidesSulfanilamidesAniline CompoundsAminesBenzene DerivativesHydrocarbons, AromaticHydrocarbons, CyclicHydrocarbonsSulfonesSulfur CompoundsPyrimidinesHeterocyclic Compounds, 1-Ring

Results Point of Contact

Title
Gayan Makumburage
Organization
AstraZeneca/ PPD

Study Officials

  • Paul Newell, MBBS, MRCP

    AstraZeneca

    STUDY DIRECTOR

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
No
Restriction Type
OTHER
Restrictive Agreement
Yes

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 3
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
QUADRUPLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

May 15, 2012

First Posted

May 16, 2012

Study Start

October 1, 2012

Primary Completion

August 1, 2014

Study Completion

August 1, 2014

Last Updated

September 6, 2017

Results First Posted

March 2, 2016

Record last verified: 2017-08

Locations