Local Delivery of Paclitaxel Via the TAPAS Catheter to Prevent Restenosis From Percutaneous Femoropopliteal Intervention
PacTAP
1 other identifier
interventional
100
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to assess the safety and efficacy of administering intra-arterial paclitaxel in the femoropopliteal arteries via the TAPAS catheter following percutaneous revascularization to prevent restenosis.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Jan 2012
Typical duration for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
January 1, 2012
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
May 13, 2012
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
May 15, 2012
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
January 1, 2013
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
January 1, 2014
CompletedMay 15, 2012
May 1, 2012
1 year
May 13, 2012
May 13, 2012
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Primary Patency
Loss of primary patency will occur for any clinically driven Target Lesion Revascularization (TLR) or a Peak Systolic Velocity Ratio (PSVR) of \> 2.5 on Duplex Ultrasound (DUS)
6 months
Primary Safety
Freedom from death, major amputation in the target limb, or Target Lesion Revascularization (either surgical or endovascular)
30 days
Secondary Outcomes (5)
Primary Patency at 12 months
12 months
Primary Assisted Patency
6 and 12 months
Secondary Patency
6 and 12 months
Functional Status
30 days, 6 months, and 12 months
Secondary Safety
30 days, 6 months, and 12 months
Study Arms (2)
Placebo
PLACEBO COMPARATORPaclitaxel
ACTIVE COMPARATORInterventions
Drug dosing is 3mcg/mm3 of artery treated with percutaneous revascularization. Drug will be administered via the TAPAS catheter and allowed to dwell for 5 minutes.
Saline will be administered intra-arterially via the TAPAS catheter following percutaneous revascularization. The dwell time will be 5minutes.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Age ≥ 18 years old.
- Subject able to provide informed consent and agree to all follow up requirements.
- Peripheral arterial disease with Rutherford Class 2-5.
- Successful percutaneous revascularization of the femoropopliteal artery (\< 20% residual stenosis by visual estimate) using standard techniques per discretion of the local operator.
- The femoropopliteal Reference Vessel Diameter (RVD) must be ≥4.0 mm and ≤7.0 mm
You may not qualify if:
- Patient is pregnant or breast feeding. (Female subjects of childbearing potential must have negative serum pregnancy test the day of the procedure.)
- Life expectancy \< 12 months.
- Contraindication to aspirin, anti-platelet/anti-coagulant therapies required for procedure/follow up.
- Known allergy to contrast media that cannot adequately be pre-medicated prior to study procedure.
- Known allergy to paclitaxel.
- Uncontrolled hypercoagulability or history of HIT or HITTS syndrome.
- Simultaneous enrollment in another investigational device or drug study.
- Previous intervention of the target limb with a drug eluting stent or drug eluting balloon.
- Absence of at least 1 TIMI-3 vessel run off into the foot.
- Total bilirubin \> 2x upper limit of normal (ULN).
- ALT or AST \> 3x ULN.
- Platelet count \< 100,000/mm3.
- White blood cell count \< 1.5/mm3.
- Any evidence of perforation or dye extravasation during the index procedure, even if successfully treated with a covered stent.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Trinity Medical Center
Bettendorf, Iowa, 52722, United States
Related Publications (8)
Tepe G, Zeller T, Albrecht T, Heller S, Schwarzwalder U, Beregi JP, Claussen CD, Oldenburg A, Scheller B, Speck U. Local delivery of paclitaxel to inhibit restenosis during angioplasty of the leg. N Engl J Med. 2008 Feb 14;358(7):689-99. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0706356.
PMID: 18272892BACKGROUNDWerk M, Langner S, Reinkensmeier B, Boettcher HF, Tepe G, Dietz U, Hosten N, Hamm B, Speck U, Ricke J. Inhibition of restenosis in femoropopliteal arteries: paclitaxel-coated versus uncoated balloon: femoral paclitaxel randomized pilot trial. Circulation. 2008 Sep 23;118(13):1358-65. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.107.735985. Epub 2008 Sep 8.
PMID: 18779447BACKGROUNDHawkins BM, Hennebry TA. Local paclitaxel delivery for treatment of peripheral arterial disease. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2011 Jun;4(3):297-302. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.110.961052. Epub 2011 May 3. No abstract available.
PMID: 21540442BACKGROUNDDake MD, Ansel GM, Jaff MR, Ohki T, Saxon RR, Smouse HB, Zeller T, Roubin GS, Burket MW, Khatib Y, Snyder SA, Ragheb AO, White JK, Machan LS; Zilver PTX Investigators. Paclitaxel-eluting stents show superiority to balloon angioplasty and bare metal stents in femoropopliteal disease: twelve-month Zilver PTX randomized study results. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2011 Oct 1;4(5):495-504. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.111.962324. Epub 2011 Sep 27.
PMID: 21953370BACKGROUNDSpeck U, Scheller B, Abramjuk C, Grossmann S, Mahnkopf D, Simon O. Inhibition of restenosis in stented porcine coronary arteries: uptake of Paclitaxel from angiographic contrast media. Invest Radiol. 2004 Mar;39(3):182-6. doi: 10.1097/01.rli.0000116125.96544.64.
PMID: 15076010BACKGROUNDScheller B, Speck U, Schmitt A, Bohm M, Nickenig G. Addition of paclitaxel to contrast media prevents restenosis after coronary stent implantation. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2003 Oct 15;42(8):1415-20. doi: 10.1016/s0735-1097(03)01056-8.
PMID: 14563585BACKGROUNDHerdeg C, Gohring-Frischholz K, Haase KK, Geisler T, Zurn C, Hartmann U, Wohrle J, Nusser T, Dippon J, May AE, Gawaz M. Catheter-based delivery of fluid paclitaxel for prevention of restenosis in native coronary artery lesions after stent implantation. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2009 Aug;2(4):294-301. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.108.827865.108.827865. Epub 2009 Jul 22.
PMID: 20031731BACKGROUNDMargolis J, McDonald J, Heuser R, Klinke P, Waksman R, Virmani R, Desai N, Hilton D. Systemic nanoparticle paclitaxel (nab-paclitaxel) for in-stent restenosis I (SNAPIST-I): a first-in-human safety and dose-finding study. Clin Cardiol. 2007 Apr;30(4):165-70. doi: 10.1002/clc.20066.
PMID: 17443649BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Eric J Dippel, MD
Midwest Cardiovascular Research Foundation
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- President, Midwest Cardiovascular Foundation
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
May 13, 2012
First Posted
May 15, 2012
Study Start
January 1, 2012
Primary Completion
January 1, 2013
Study Completion
January 1, 2014
Last Updated
May 15, 2012
Record last verified: 2012-05