Telbivudine Versus Entecavir in Reducing Serum HBsAg Levels in Patients With HBeAg-positive Chronic Hepatitis B
TERESA
A Randomized, Open-label Trial Comparing Telbivudine vs, Entecavir in Reducing Serum HBsAg Levels in Patients With HBeAg-positive Chronic Hepatitis B Who Have Achieved Serum HBV DNA Undetectability by Preceding Entecavir Treatment
1 other identifier
interventional
98
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The goal of chronic hepatitis B (CHB) treatment is complete and permanent eradication of hepatitis B virus (HBV) from patient's body, which is best represented by serum HBsAg loss accompanied by undetectable serum HBV DNA level. While the most recently approved nucleos(t)ide analogues (NA) have marked antiviral potency and can induce HBV DNA undetectability in the majority of patients through prolonged treatment, NA need to be given long term, almost indefinitely, in most cases because they suppress HBV DNA only during therapy. For example, even after HBeAg-loss by a potent NA, suppression of serum HBV DNA to undetectable level is sustained only in about 23%-37% at 24 weeks off treatment. Thus, continuous therapy with NA until HBsAg clearance remains necessary in a majority of cases. The recent availability of commercial quantitative assays of serum hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) has enabled quantitative HBsAg to be used as a biomarker for prognosis and treatment response in CHB. It has been suggested that HBsAg decline during lamivudine or entecavir therapy is slower and less pronounced compared to interferon treatment, despite a higher effect on HBV DNA suppression. Based on HBsAg kinetics, it has been estimated that the predicted median time to HBsAg loss in patients treated with lamivudine or entecavir is more than 30 years. Thus, treatment that can induce rapid decline of HBsAg would have clear advantage in reducing the treatment duration required to achieve HBsAg-loss. Interestingly, in a recent preliminary study, 24-weeks of treatment with telbivudine has induced HBsAg decline as comparable to pegylated interferon treatment. Although there has been no head-to-head trial comparing NAs in inducing HBsAg decline, previous studies consistently suggested that the decline of HBsAg is greater during telbivudine treatment compared with lamivudine or entecavir. Thus, in this clinical trial, the investigators will investigate whether telbivudine is more effective in inducing HBsAg decline compared with entecavir in HBeAg-positive CHB patients who have achieved undetectable serum HBV DNA by preceding entecavir treatment.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for phase_3
Started May 2012
Typical duration for phase_3
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
May 1, 2012
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
May 8, 2012
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
May 10, 2012
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 1, 2014
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 1, 2014
CompletedJanuary 26, 2017
January 1, 2017
2.6 years
May 8, 2012
January 24, 2017
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
HBsAg titer at 48 weeks
at 48 weeks
Secondary Outcomes (7)
Proportion of patients with serum HBsAg decline of ≥0.5 log10 IU/mL and <1.0 log10 IU/mL
at 48 weeks of treatment
Proportion of patients with serum HBsAg decline greater than 1.0 log10 IU/mL
at 48 weeks of treatment
Proportion of patients with serum HBsAg loss
at 48 weeks of treatment
Proportion of patients with serum HBeAg loss or HBeAg seroconversion
at 48 weeks of treatment
Proportion of patients with virologic rebound or genotypic resistance
up to 48 weeks of treatment
- +2 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Telbivudine
EXPERIMENTALTelbivudine 600 mg Daily Oral
Entecavir
ACTIVE COMPARATOREntecavir 0.5 mg Daily Oral
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- HBsAg titer \> 1,000 IU/mL
- HBeAg positive at study entry and at the baseline of ETV treatment
- HBV DNA undetectable (\<15 IU/mL) at least 2 occasions of more than 3 months apart
- Treatment with entecavir (0.5 mg/day) for more than 1 year
- Patient is ambulatory.
- Patient is able and willing to give informed consent.
You may not qualify if:
- Prior exposure to oral nucloes(t)ide analogue other than entecavir
- Prior any exposure to interferon or pegylated interferon
- Cirrhosis with Child-Pugh score ≥8
- Hepatocellular carcinoma Identified or suspected
- Other malignancy
- Prior organ transplantation
- Under immunosuppressive agent
- Renal insufficiency (serum creatinine \> 1.4)
- Pregnant woman or willing to be pregnant woman or man
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Asan Medical Center
Seoul, 138-736, South Korea
Related Publications (1)
An J, Lim YS, Kim GA, Han SB, Jeong W, Lee D, Shim JH, Lee HC, Lee YS. Telbivudine versus entecavir in patients with undetectable hepatitis B virus DNA: a randomized trial. BMC Gastroenterol. 2017 Jan 19;17(1):15. doi: 10.1186/s12876-017-0572-2.
PMID: 28103819DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Interventions
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Young-Suk Lim, M.D., Ph.D.
Asan Medical Center
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 3
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Associate Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
May 8, 2012
First Posted
May 10, 2012
Study Start
May 1, 2012
Primary Completion
December 1, 2014
Study Completion
December 1, 2014
Last Updated
January 26, 2017
Record last verified: 2017-01