Solifenacin Succinate Versus Fesoterodine A Comparison Trial for Urgency Symptoms
Solifenacin Succinate vs. Fesoterodine A Comparison Trial for the Treatment of Bothersome Urgency Symptoms
1 other identifier
interventional
60
1 country
5
Brief Summary
Hypothesis: Objective 1: To advance the investigators understanding on the effect of solifenacin succinate (10 mg OD) vs. fesoterodine (8mg OD) on urinary urgency using a validated Urgency Severity and Impact Questionnaire (USIQ). Hypothesis 1.1: The severity of urgency symptoms as measured by USIQ will change differently in women with OAB following a 3 month treatment with solifenacin succinate (10 mg OD) vs. fesoterodine (8mg OD). Hypothesis 2.1: Condition-specific quality of life (QOL) as measured by USIQ will change differently in women with OAB following a 3 month treatment with solifenacin succinate (10 mg OD) vs. fesoterodine (8mg OD). Objective 2: To advance the investigators understanding on the adverse events (AE's) of solifenacin succinate (10 mg OD) vs. fesoterodine (8mg OD). Hypothesis 1.1: The severity and rate of AE's in women with OAB following a 3 month of treatment with solifenacin succinate (10 mg OD) vs. fesoterodine (8mg OD) will be different.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started May 2012
5 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
May 1, 2012
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
May 8, 2012
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
May 9, 2012
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
May 1, 2013
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
May 1, 2013
CompletedMay 16, 2012
May 1, 2012
1 year
May 8, 2012
May 14, 2012
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Changes in urgency sensation
The effect of two different antochloinergic treatment on urgency symptoms will be measured by comparing USIQ scores changes in the two study arms, before and after treatment. Changes in urgency sensation will be analysed by subsiding the USIQ scopre at 2 months (second visit) from the USIQ score at baseline. Independent student t- test will be used for Comparison between the changes in USIQ score of the two groups.
two months following treatment
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Adverse events
two months
Study Arms (2)
solifenacin succinate (10 mg OD)
ACTIVE COMPARATORfesoterodine (8mg OD)
ACTIVE COMPARATORInterventions
8 mg once daily for 60 days
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Are \> 18 years old
- Have a clinical diagnosis of OAB (wet or dry) with urinary urgency
- Are seeking treatment for OAB
- No contraindication to solifenacin succinate (10 mg OD) or fesoterodine (8mg OD)
- Have a negative urine dipstick analysis
- Are able to consent and fill out study documents and complete all study visits
- Have not been treated with an anticholinergic medication in the past 1-month
You may not qualify if:
- Have known neurologic disorder, e.g.: multiple sclerosis, Parkinson's Disease, spinal cord injury, stroke
- Are currently receiving treatment for OAB, including medications, physical and/or formal behavioral therapy, or electrical stimulation
- Have an elevated post -void residual volume by ultrasound or straight catheterization (PVR\>150 ml)
- Were treated for a urinary tract infection in the last month
- Have untreated narrow angle glaucoma
- Are unable to comprehend and complete study tasks
- Have an allergy to or had previously failed treatment with solifenacin succinate or fesoterodine
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (5)
Rambam Health Care Campus
Haifa, Israel
Hadassah
Jerusalem, Israel
Belinson
Petah Tikva, Israel
Rebecca Ziv
Safed, Israel
Asaf harofeh
Tel Aviv, Israel
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Anna Padoa, MD
Assaf-Harofeh Medical Center
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Haim Krissi, MD
Belinson Medical center
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
David Shveiky, MD
Hadassa
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Naama Marcus, MD
Rebecca ziv
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Lior Lowenstein, MD, MS
Rambam Health Care Campus
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Head Of Urgoyncology Service
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
May 8, 2012
First Posted
May 9, 2012
Study Start
May 1, 2012
Primary Completion
May 1, 2013
Study Completion
May 1, 2013
Last Updated
May 16, 2012
Record last verified: 2012-05