NCT01586897

Brief Summary

This project tests a model of chronic disease medication management in which the decision to initiate or adjust medical therapy is directly linked to a sequence of subsequent clinical actions (e.g. monitoring for adverse drug events, assessing response to therapy, changing medication dose) performed independently of the office visit. The investigators hypothesize that establishing a visit-independent, health information technology (IT) supported cycle of laboratory monitoring and iterative medication dose adjustment will result in more effective chronic disease care.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
52

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable diabetes-mellitus-type-2

Timeline
Completed

Started May 2012

Shorter than P25 for not_applicable diabetes-mellitus-type-2

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

April 25, 2012

Completed
2 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

April 27, 2012

Completed
4 days until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

May 1, 2012

Completed
1 year until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

May 1, 2013

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

May 1, 2013

Completed
2.6 years until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

December 9, 2015

Completed
Last Updated

January 11, 2016

Status Verified

December 1, 2015

Enrollment Period

1 year

First QC Date

April 25, 2012

Results QC Date

July 8, 2015

Last Update Submit

December 8, 2015

Conditions

Keywords

health information technologyprimary carevisit-independentmedication monitoring

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (5)

  • Primary Effectiveness Outcome - LDL

    Percentage of follow-up time (from initial prescription to final laboratory result available during the 18-month study period) that a patient is at or below risk factor goal for LDL(LDL-cholesterol ≤ 130 mg/dL for patients without cardiovascular risk and ≤ 100 mg/dl for patients with cardiovascular risk).

    1 year

  • Primary Effectiveness Outcome - A1c

    Percentage of follow-up time (from initial prescription to final laboratory result available during the 18-month study period) that a patient is at or below risk factor goal for HbA1c(HbA1c ≤ 7.0%).

    1 year

  • Medication Safety Monitoring - Statins

    Percentage of laboratory tests (liver function tests after a new statin prescription or a change in statin dose) that have been measured within 4 weeks following prescription. Treatment guidelines for prescription of statins recommend follow-up liver function testing. We chose 4-weeks following the prescription to represent successful safety monitoring.

    Within 4 weeks following prescription

  • Medication Safety Monitoring - Metformin

    Percentage of renal function laboratory tests that have been measured within 4-weeks following prescription. Treatment guidelines for prescription of metformin recommend renal function testing. We chose 4- weeks following the prescription to represent successful safety monitoring.

    Within 4 weeks following prescription

  • Medication Safety Monitoring - ACE/ARB, Thiazide

    Percentage of laboratory tests (potassium for thiazides, renal/potassium for ACE/ARBs that have been measured within 4-weeks following prescription. Treatment guidelines for prescription of ACE/ARBs recommend renal/potassium testing and potassium testing for prescription of thiazides. We chose 4-weeks following the prescription to represent successful safety monitoring.

    Within 4 weeks following prescription

Study Arms (2)

Use of Medication Metronome

EXPERIMENTAL

Providers allocated to intervention will automatically see an additional feature when logging on to their electronic health record medication prescription interface that enables them to schedule future laboratory testing for the pre-defined subset of study-specific medications. New prescription or dose adjustment by the PCP of one of these pre-specified medications used to treat type 2 diabetes, hypertension, or hyperlipidemia will initiate the follow-up result monitoring, patient outreach, and PCP reminders that constitute the Medication Metronome system.

Device: Medication Metronome

Usual Care

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

PCPs allocated to the control arm will continue with usual care practices for laboratory monitoring.

Other: Usual Care

Interventions

Providers allocated to intervention will see an additional feature when logging on to their electronic health record medication prescription interface that enables them to schedule future laboratory testing for the pre-defined subset of study-specific medications. New prescription or dose adjustment by the PCP of one of these pre-specified medications used to treat type 2 diabetes, hypertension, or hyperlipidemia will initiate the follow-up result monitoring, patient outreach, and PCP reminders that constitute the Medication Metronome system.

Use of Medication Metronome
Usual Care

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • All primary care physicians from participating practices will be eligible to participate in the study.
  • Patients Eligible for Analysis: The primary unit of analysis will be prescribed medicine, grouped with patient and within prescribing PCP. Three potentially overlapping medication-based cohorts will be defined: 1) Patients prescribed any hypoglycemic agents, 2) Patients prescribed thiazide diuretics, ACE-Is, or ARBs, and 3) Patients prescribed statins. Based on this design, individual patients may contribute to more than one medication analytic cohort.

You may not qualify if:

  • Patients Excluded from Analysis: Patients who are subsequently identified as having died during the course of the study intervention using the Social Security Death Index, to have left the MGH system, or to have changed PCPs.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Massachusetts General Hospital

Boston, Massachusetts, 02114, United States

Location

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2HypertensionHyperlipidemias

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Diabetes MellitusGlucose Metabolism DisordersMetabolic DiseasesNutritional and Metabolic DiseasesEndocrine System DiseasesVascular DiseasesCardiovascular DiseasesDyslipidemiasLipid Metabolism Disorders

Limitations and Caveats

Study participants did not embrace this method of non-visit based care, with only 660 medication prescriptions using the Medication Metronome ordering option (21% of possible orders).

Results Point of Contact

Title
Steven J. Atlas, Director of Massachusetts General Primary Care Practice Based Research Network
Organization
Massachusetts General Hospital

Study Officials

  • Steven J Atlas, MD, MPH

    Massachusetts General Hospital

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
No
Restrictive Agreement
No

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Principal Investigator

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

April 25, 2012

First Posted

April 27, 2012

Study Start

May 1, 2012

Primary Completion

May 1, 2013

Study Completion

May 1, 2013

Last Updated

January 11, 2016

Results First Posted

December 9, 2015

Record last verified: 2015-12

Locations