NCT01586546

Brief Summary

Aim: To answer the questions of whether a Mind-Body Medicine (MBM) skills group facilitated face-to-face and online can improve measures of Quality of Life (QOL) in a population of cancer patients. Value of Study: Technological advances have contributed to new venues for healthcare delivery. It is imperative that these new delivery methods, for individual and/or group psychosocial services are sufficiently tested and validated. Research shows that there is very little knowledge about differences in communication styles between online and face-to-face groups, nor is there much knowledge on the overall efficacy of online groups. Phenomenon Studied: Can MBM skills groups improve the quality of life of cancer patients? Is there a difference in outcome between a MBM skills group delivered face-to-face and a MBM skills group delivered online. Reasons Leading to Proposing the Project: Despite encouraging research showing that psychosocial interventions have positive effects in the lives of cancer patients, more research is needed due to several problems of current research, such as poor study design, lack of use of technological advances and relatively few existing studies on the effectiveness of MBM therapies in the oncological setting. Stated Hypothesis: Hypothesis 1: There is no difference between baseline QOL measures and QOL measures at the end of face-to-face facilitated MBM skills groups. Hypothesis 2: There is no difference between baseline QOL measures and QOL measures at the end of Online facilitated MBM skills groups. Hypothesis 3: Participation in either, online facilitated MBM skills groups or face-to-face facilitated MBM skills groups will improve QOL measures when compared to control group. Hypothesis 4: Patients in the control group (waitlist control, care as usual group) will have no improvement on QOL measures. Anticipated Value to the Larger Community: According to the National Center for Complementary and Alternative Medicine (NCCAM) "…there is a need for reliable, objective, evidence-based information regarding the usefulness and safety-or lack thereof-of CAM" (National Center for Complementary and Alternative Medicine, 2011, p.3). This study will add to general scientific knowledge of CAM and MBM.

Trial Health

57
Monitor

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
32

participants targeted

Target at below P25 for not_applicable quality-of-life

Timeline
Completed

Started May 2012

Shorter than P25 for not_applicable quality-of-life

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
terminated

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

April 23, 2012

Completed
4 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

April 27, 2012

Completed
4 days until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

May 1, 2012

Completed
7 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

December 1, 2012

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

December 1, 2012

Completed
Last Updated

July 5, 2019

Status Verified

July 1, 2019

Enrollment Period

7 months

First QC Date

April 23, 2012

Last Update Submit

July 1, 2019

Conditions

Keywords

Mind-bodyPsychosocialMeditationBreathing ExercisesGuided ImageryVisualization

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Change in Quality Of Life, as assessed by the World Health Organization Quality of Life (WHOQOL-BREF) instrument

    The WHOQOL-BREF is a 26-item version of the WHOQOL-100 assessment. The instrument has been tested and developed for almost 20 years and "…results indicate that overall, the WHOQOL-BREF is a sound, cross-culturally valid assessment of QOL, as reflected by its four domains: physical, psychological, social and environment" (Skevington, Lofty, \& O'Connell, 2004).

    Baseline, week 4

Secondary Outcomes (1)

  • Change in distress, anxiety, depression and need for help as assessed by the Emotion Thermometers Tool© (ET5)

    Baseline, Week 4

Study Arms (4)

Face-to-Face MBM Skills Group

EXPERIMENTAL
Behavioral: Face-to-Face MBM Skills Group

Online MBM Skills Group

EXPERIMENTAL
Behavioral: Online MBM Skills Group

Waitlist Control I

OTHER

This group will be given the option to participate in a face-to-face MBM skills group intervention after conclusion of study.

Other: Waitlist Control I

Waitlisted Control II

OTHER

This group will be given the option to participate in an Online MBM skills group intervention after conclusion of study.

Other: Waitlist Control II

Interventions

Mind Body Medicine (MBM) Skills Groups provide a means for study participants to learn skills for taking care of themselves in a supportive small group setting. Participants will learn and practice a variety of specific MBM skills. These MBM skills will enable a participant to change the way she/he deals with the wide range of stressors at different stages of her/his cancer journey. Some of these MBM skills are meditation, guided imagery, biofeedback, writing, and drawing. These groups are designed to assist a participant in coming to know themselves better and in learning and using these tools that will help the participant to deal with the distress as only a small percentage of cancer patients in distress receive appropriate support.

Face-to-Face MBM Skills Group

No intervention offered during study period. Intervention is offered after completion of study.

Waitlist Control I

No intervention offered during study period. Intervention is offered after completion of study.

Waitlisted Control II

Mind Body Medicine (MBM) Skills Groups provide a means for study participants to learn skills for taking care of themselves in a supportive small group setting. Participants will learn and practice a variety of specific MBM skills. These MBM skills will enable a participant to change the way she/he deals with the wide range of stressors at different stages of her/his cancer journey. Some of these MBM skills are meditation, guided imagery, biofeedback, writing, and drawing. These groups are designed to assist a participant in coming to know themselves better and in learning and using these tools that will help the participant to deal with the distress as only a small percentage of cancer patients in distress receive appropriate support.

Online MBM Skills Group

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • TNM staged tumors Stage I to Stage IV,
  • Tumors staged according to the Ann Arbor staging classification system (commonly lymphomas)
  • Tumors which don't have a clear-cut staging system such as most types of leukemia and blood or bone marrow cancers
  • Tumors staged by the International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (cervix, uterus, ovary, vagina, and vulva).
  • No neurological illness

You may not qualify if:

  • Mental functioning clinically estimated to be below the low average range (IQ\< 80). (Impaired cognitive level might impede verbal comprehension).
  • Not being able to speak or understand English;
  • No access to reliable computer with operational software to participate in online video conferences
  • Unavailability of built-in or external web-cam
  • Unavailability of reliable high-speed Internet connection
  • Unavailability of reliable transportation to and from face-to-face MBM skills group meetings
  • Barring unforeseen circumstances, intent to participate in each and every one of the eight MBM Skills Groups session

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Absenger Cancer Education Foundation

Spring Lake, Michigan, 49456, United States

Location

Related Links

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Neoplasms

Study Officials

  • Werner Absenger, M.Sc.

    Absenger Cancer Education Foundation, Spring Lake, Michigan & Saybrook University's College of Mind-Body Medicine, San Francisco, California

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
SUPPORTIVE CARE
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

April 23, 2012

First Posted

April 27, 2012

Study Start

May 1, 2012

Primary Completion

December 1, 2012

Study Completion

December 1, 2012

Last Updated

July 5, 2019

Record last verified: 2019-07

Locations