ERCP in Idiopathic Recurrent Acute Pancreatitis
Defining the Role of ERCP in the Evaluation and Treatment of Idiopathic Recurrent Acute Pancreatitis
1 other identifier
interventional
89
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The therapeutic impact of ERCP with sphincterotomy in the management of patients with idiopathic recurrent acute pancreatitis (RAP) needs further study. The investigators conducted a single center, feasibility, randomized trial to determine 1) the role of pancreatic manometry in predicting future episodes of RAP and 2) differences in the efficacy of no, biliary (BES) or pancreatobiliary (dual) endoscopic sphincterotomy (DES).
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Sep 1997
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
September 1, 1997
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
April 1, 2012
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
April 20, 2012
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
April 24, 2012
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
October 1, 2014
CompletedOctober 10, 2014
October 1, 2014
14.6 years
April 20, 2012
October 8, 2014
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Recurrent acute pancreatitis
Patients will be followed post-ERCP for up to 10 years. The primary outcome is development of acute pancreatitis following the index ERCP, based on standard definitions. Acute pancreatitis is defined as new onset of pancreatic-type abdominal pain with associated elevation in serum amylase or lipase \> 3 times the upper limit of normal, OR radiographic findings consistent with acute pancreatitis.
120 months
Secondary Outcomes (2)
Interval development of chronic pancreatitis
120 months
Secondary assessment of risk factors for developing recurrent acute pancreatitis during follow-up
120 months
Study Arms (4)
Biliary sphincterotomy
ACTIVE COMPARATORCutting of the biliary sphincter muscle alone
Dual sphincterotomy
ACTIVE COMPARATORCutting of both the biliary and pancreatic sphincter muscles.
Sham
SHAM COMPARATORAmong patients with normal sphincter of Oddi manometry, patients will undergo no sphincterotomy (sham therapy).
Biliary sphincterotomy - Normal SOM
ACTIVE COMPARATORAmong patients with normal SOM, patients may be randomized to empiric biliary sphincterotomy alone.
Interventions
Cutting of the biliary sphincter muscle.
Cutting of both the biliary and pancreatic sphincter muscles.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Idiopathic recurrent acute pancreatitis, defined as two or more episodes requiring hospitalization
- ERCP with SOM planned
You may not qualify if:
- Chronic pancreatitis
- Pancreas divisum
- Alternate etiology identified (e.g., CBD stone, IPMN)
- Inability to perform pancreatic manometry
- Pregnancy, age \< 18, incarceration
- Inability to provide informed consent
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Indiana University Health University Hospital
Indianapolis, Indiana, 46202, United States
Related Publications (1)
Cote GA, Imperiale TF, Schmidt SE, Fogel E, Lehman G, McHenry L, Watkins J, Sherman S. Similar efficacies of biliary, with or without pancreatic, sphincterotomy in treatment of idiopathic recurrent acute pancreatitis. Gastroenterology. 2012 Dec;143(6):1502-1509.e1. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2012.09.006. Epub 2012 Sep 11.
PMID: 22982183RESULT
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Stuart Sherman, MD
Indiana University
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- FACTORIAL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
April 20, 2012
First Posted
April 24, 2012
Study Start
September 1, 1997
Primary Completion
April 1, 2012
Study Completion
October 1, 2014
Last Updated
October 10, 2014
Record last verified: 2014-10