CPB Versus Sham Treatment for Pain Management in Small Duct Chronic Pancreatitis
Randomized Single Blinded Control Trial Comparing EUS Guided Celiac Plexus Block (CPB) Versus Sham Treatment for Pain Management in Small Duct Chronic Pancreatitis
1 other identifier
interventional
5
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This study assesses the pain response to Endoscopic Ultrasound (EUS) guided Celiac Plexus Block (CPB) treatment in comparison to EUS without a pain block administered. All participants will receive medications for pain as needed.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Oct 2013
Typical duration for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
October 1, 2013
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
January 29, 2014
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
February 4, 2014
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
October 1, 2015
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
October 1, 2015
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
February 28, 2017
CompletedFebruary 28, 2017
January 1, 2017
2 years
January 29, 2014
April 22, 2016
January 9, 2017
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Change in Pain Response Over a 6 Month Period of Time Using the VAS Score
Pain scores will be assessed by comparing the mean number change using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) from baseline to 6 month. The scale is 10 - 0, with 10 being agonizing pain and 0 being no pain.
baseline to 6 months
Secondary Outcomes (5)
Mean Quality of Life Score Between Each Group at 6 Months
6 months post baseline
Number of Subject in Each Group Requiring Administration of Narcotics During 6 Months Post Baseline
baseline to 6 months
Mean Mental State Between Groups Using the Beck's Depression Index at 6 Months.
baseline to 6 months
Mean Number of Times Subjects in Each Group Accessed the Health Care System Within 6 Months Post Procedure
baseline to 6 months
% of Subjects in Each Group That Are Employed at 6 Months Post Procedure.
baseline to 6 months
Study Arms (2)
Celiac Plexus Block
EXPERIMENTALCeliac Plexus Block will be administered following EUS
Sham
SHAM COMPARATORA celiac plexus block will not be administered for pain management
Interventions
Patients will receive celiac plexus block during endoscopy.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- All patients referred to UAB Endoscopy Unit for with known chronic pancreatitis
- Patients referred to the endoscopy unit with abdominal pain with suspicion of chronic pancreatitis meeting 5 of 9 parenchymal and ductal changes (i.e. lobulations, hyperechoic stranding, hyperechoic foci, cysts, calcification, irregular duct, hyperechoic walls, side branch dilations and ductal calculi).
You may not qualify if:
- Age \<19 years
- Unable to safely undergo EUS for any reason
- Coagulopathy (INR \>1.6, Prothrombin Time \>18secs, Thrombocytopenia \<80,000 cells/ml)
- Unable to consent
- Non-English speaking patients.
- Previously undergone CPB
- Pregnancy and Breast feeding
- Patients with ductal strictures, calcification, pancreatic ductal calculi, pseudocysts.
- Previous pancreatic surgery
- Previous pseudocyst drainage
- Other documented causes of abdominal pain.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
University of Alabama at Birmingham
Birmingham, Alabama, 35294, United States
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Jaypal Ramesh
- Organization
- University of Alabama at Birmingham
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Charles M Wilcox, MD
University of Alabama at Birmingham
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
January 29, 2014
First Posted
February 4, 2014
Study Start
October 1, 2013
Primary Completion
October 1, 2015
Study Completion
October 1, 2015
Last Updated
February 28, 2017
Results First Posted
February 28, 2017
Record last verified: 2017-01
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share