Oculomotor Testing in the Differential Diagnosis of Dementia
OculoMacl
Oculomotor Recording in the Contribution to the Early Differential Diagnosis of Dementia With Lewy Bodies and Alzheimer's Disease
1 other identifier
interventional
65
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The aim of this study is to determine whether saccadic eye movement recording may help in the discrimination between Lewy body dementia and Alzheimer disease, in the early stages of the disease. Study type: Interventional Study design: Intervention Model: Single group assignment Primary purpose: Diagnostic
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for phase_3
Started Jun 2011
Longer than P75 for phase_3
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
June 1, 2011
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
February 23, 2012
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
April 13, 2012
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
February 1, 2016
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
April 1, 2016
CompletedMay 23, 2016
April 1, 2016
4.7 years
February 23, 2012
May 20, 2016
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Variability of reflexive saccades latencies
The variability is indicated by the coefficient of variation (i.e. standard-error/mean) of saccades latencies in the gap paradigm. The variability and mean latency are expected to be increased while the percentage of express latencies decreased in DLB patients
at one year
Secondary Outcomes (8)
Correlations between oculomotor records and neuropsychological examination assessing attention abilities and their fluctuations
at one year
Potential correlations between hippocampal volume and neuropsychological examination in DLB cases
at one year
Cerebral atrophy differences between DLB and AD using SVM (Support Vector Machine) method
at one year
Percentage of alpha synuclein in CSF to discriminate DLB from AD
at one year
Variations at one year in oculomotor test scores and neuropsychological test scores
at one year
- +3 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (1)
Early stage of dementia
EXPERIMENTALoculomotor measurements
Interventions
The variability is indicated by the coefficient of variation (i.e. standard-error/mean) of saccades latencies in the gap paradigm. Mean reflexive saccades latency Percentage of express saccades
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patients aged 65 and over
- Patients with a diagnosis of probable DLB or AD according to the Consortium on DLB criteria (McKeith et al 2005) for Lewy bodies dementia and according to DSM IV and NINCDS- ADRDA criteria for AD or patients in whom there is diagnostic uncertainty between DLB and AD
- No major sensory deficits
- MMSE \> 20
- Having signed an informed consent form
You may not qualify if:
- Parkinson syndrome progressing for more than one year regarding cognitive impairment
- Use of AchEIs medication
- Taking or having taken anti Parkinson drugs
- Neuroleptic drugs over the previous three months
- Contraindication for lumbar puncture (i.e. anticoagulant agents)
- Patients with Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS) \> 10
- Taking medication that could impact dopamine transporter's measurement
- Contraindication for MRI examination
- Diseases involving the short-term survival (shorter than one year)
- Not fluent in French
- Major sensory deficits that could interfere with cognitive assessment (visual and auditory)
- Being under guardianship
- Absence of caregiver/informant to sign informed consent form
- Non health insurance affiliation
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Paris - Pitié-Salpetriere hospital
Paris, 75013, France
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Marc Verny, MD, PhD
Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 3
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- DIAGNOSTIC
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
February 23, 2012
First Posted
April 13, 2012
Study Start
June 1, 2011
Primary Completion
February 1, 2016
Study Completion
April 1, 2016
Last Updated
May 23, 2016
Record last verified: 2016-04
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share