NCT01577394

Brief Summary

The aim of this study is to determine whether saccadic eye movement recording may help in the discrimination between Lewy body dementia and Alzheimer disease, in the early stages of the disease. Study type: Interventional Study design: Intervention Model: Single group assignment Primary purpose: Diagnostic

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
65

participants targeted

Target at below P25 for phase_3

Timeline
Completed

Started Jun 2011

Longer than P75 for phase_3

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

June 1, 2011

Completed
9 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

February 23, 2012

Completed
2 months until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

April 13, 2012

Completed
3.8 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

February 1, 2016

Completed
2 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

April 1, 2016

Completed
Last Updated

May 23, 2016

Status Verified

April 1, 2016

Enrollment Period

4.7 years

First QC Date

February 23, 2012

Last Update Submit

May 20, 2016

Conditions

Keywords

Alzheimer diseaseLewy Body DiseaseCognitive DisordersNeurodegenerative DiseasesDifferential diagnosisEye movement

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Variability of reflexive saccades latencies

    The variability is indicated by the coefficient of variation (i.e. standard-error/mean) of saccades latencies in the gap paradigm. The variability and mean latency are expected to be increased while the percentage of express latencies decreased in DLB patients

    at one year

Secondary Outcomes (8)

  • Correlations between oculomotor records and neuropsychological examination assessing attention abilities and their fluctuations

    at one year

  • Potential correlations between hippocampal volume and neuropsychological examination in DLB cases

    at one year

  • Cerebral atrophy differences between DLB and AD using SVM (Support Vector Machine) method

    at one year

  • Percentage of alpha synuclein in CSF to discriminate DLB from AD

    at one year

  • Variations at one year in oculomotor test scores and neuropsychological test scores

    at one year

  • +3 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (1)

Early stage of dementia

EXPERIMENTAL

oculomotor measurements

Other: oculomotor measurements

Interventions

The variability is indicated by the coefficient of variation (i.e. standard-error/mean) of saccades latencies in the gap paradigm. Mean reflexive saccades latency Percentage of express saccades

Also known as: reflexive saccades latencies
Early stage of dementia

Eligibility Criteria

Age65 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsOlder Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Patients aged 65 and over
  • Patients with a diagnosis of probable DLB or AD according to the Consortium on DLB criteria (McKeith et al 2005) for Lewy bodies dementia and according to DSM IV and NINCDS- ADRDA criteria for AD or patients in whom there is diagnostic uncertainty between DLB and AD
  • No major sensory deficits
  • MMSE \> 20
  • Having signed an informed consent form

You may not qualify if:

  • Parkinson syndrome progressing for more than one year regarding cognitive impairment
  • Use of AchEIs medication
  • Taking or having taken anti Parkinson drugs
  • Neuroleptic drugs over the previous three months
  • Contraindication for lumbar puncture (i.e. anticoagulant agents)
  • Patients with Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS) \> 10
  • Taking medication that could impact dopamine transporter's measurement
  • Contraindication for MRI examination
  • Diseases involving the short-term survival (shorter than one year)
  • Not fluent in French
  • Major sensory deficits that could interfere with cognitive assessment (visual and auditory)
  • Being under guardianship
  • Absence of caregiver/informant to sign informed consent form
  • Non health insurance affiliation

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Paris - Pitié-Salpetriere hospital

Paris, 75013, France

Location

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Lewy Body DiseaseAlzheimer DiseaseCognitive DysfunctionNeurodegenerative Diseases

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Parkinsonian DisordersBasal Ganglia DiseasesBrain DiseasesCentral Nervous System DiseasesNervous System DiseasesDementiaMovement DisordersSynucleinopathiesNeurocognitive DisordersMental DisordersTauopathiesCognition Disorders

Study Officials

  • Marc Verny, MD, PhD

    Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 3
Allocation
NA
Masking
NONE
Purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Intervention Model
SINGLE GROUP
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

February 23, 2012

First Posted

April 13, 2012

Study Start

June 1, 2011

Primary Completion

February 1, 2016

Study Completion

April 1, 2016

Last Updated

May 23, 2016

Record last verified: 2016-04

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations