Elders Preferences in Care Decisions
EPIC-D
Improving Appropriate Colorectal Cancer Screening in Elderly Patients
2 other identifiers
interventional
424
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The purpose of this research study is to explore ways to improve appropriate colorectal cancer (CRC) screening in the elderly by attempting to target screening in those most likely to benefit and avoiding screening in those least likely to benefit.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Mar 2012
Typical duration for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
March 1, 2012
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 29, 2012
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
April 12, 2012
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
February 1, 2015
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
February 1, 2015
CompletedJanuary 10, 2022
May 1, 2015
2.9 years
March 29, 2012
December 16, 2021
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Appropriate colorectal cancer screening
The proportion of participants classified as having appropriate colorectal cancer screening in the intervention group compared to the control group. Appropriate screening is a combined outcome measure using patient report of completion or non-completion of CRC screening tests and patient report of discussions about CRC screening with their provider at the index visit. The outcome will be measured six months after the index visit. The index visit is the patient/provider visit that occurred after the decision support intervention or control condition was administered.
Six months after intervention or control was adminstered
Secondary Outcomes (4)
Appropriate colorectal cancer screening decisions
At baseline (after intervention or control was administered)
Appropriate screening and mediators
Six months after intervention or control was adminstered
Appropriate screening for health strata
Six months after intervention or control was adminstered
Appropriate screening for stool cards
Six months after intervention or control was adminstered
Study Arms (2)
Making A Decision About CRC Screening
EXPERIMENTALA decision support intervention that is a literacy sensitive paper based tool with educational information targeted to the patient's age and gender.
Drivers 65 Plus
PLACEBO COMPARATORThe placebo comparator is an attention control with information about driving tips for drivers age 65 and older.
Interventions
Targeted by age and gender with 3 components. 1. Educational component 2. Values clarification exercise 3. Individualized decision making worksheet The intervention or control condition is administered before the index visit with the patient's provider.
This text booklet is provided as an attention control for those in the control arm and like the intervention is administered prior to the index visit with the patient's provider.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Men and women ages 70 to 84
- Not up to date with colon cancer screening or surveillance
You may not qualify if:
- Men and women younger than 70 years of age or older than 84
- History of Colorectal Cancer
- Inflammatory bowel disease
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- University of North Carolina, Chapel Hilllead
- Duke Universitycollaborator
- Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ)collaborator
Study Sites (1)
Duke Practiced Based Research Network
Durham, North Carolina, 27710, United States
Related Publications (2)
Dalton AF, Golin CE, Morris C, Kistler CE, Dolor RJ, Bertin KB, Suresh K, Patel SG, Lewis CL. Effect of a Patient Decision Aid on Preferences for Colorectal Cancer Screening Among Older Adults: A Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Netw Open. 2022 Dec 1;5(12):e2244982. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.44982.
PMID: 36469317DERIVEDLewis CL, Kistler CE, Dalton AF, Morris C, Ferrari R, Barclay C, Brewer NT, Dolor R, Harris R, Vu M, Golin CE. A Decision Aid to Promote Appropriate Colorectal Cancer Screening among Older Adults: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Med Decis Making. 2018 Jul;38(5):614-624. doi: 10.1177/0272989X18773713.
PMID: 29847251DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Carmen L Lewis, MD, MPH
University of North Carolina
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Rowena J Dolor, MD, MHS
Duke University
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- TRIPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- PREVENTION
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 29, 2012
First Posted
April 12, 2012
Study Start
March 1, 2012
Primary Completion
February 1, 2015
Study Completion
February 1, 2015
Last Updated
January 10, 2022
Record last verified: 2015-05