Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Modular Registry
CRT-MORE
1 other identifier
observational
500
1 country
12
Brief Summary
The purpose of the study is to collect some parameters (clinical, electrical, radiographic, echocardiographic and ECG) able to predict response to cardiac resynchronization therapy.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for all trials
Started Dec 2011
Longer than P75 for all trials
12 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
December 1, 2011
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
April 2, 2012
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
April 6, 2012
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 1, 2015
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 1, 2015
CompletedFebruary 24, 2017
February 1, 2017
4 years
April 2, 2012
February 22, 2017
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (3)
Clinical response
Improvement in functional class status by at least one NYHA Class or remain in functional class II
24 months
Echocardiographic response of absolute increase of ≥5% in LVEF
Patients at follow-up to 6-12 months show an increase of the absolute value of the LVEF than 5%
24 months
Echocardiographic response of ≥15% reduction in LVESV
Patients at follow-up to 6-12 months show a systolic volume (LVESV) reduction greater than 15%
24 months
Secondary Outcomes (3)
LV lead/RV lead geometric distance
12 months
Change from baseline in R wave in 12-lead ECG at 12 months
12 months
Number of ventricular arrhythmias after cardiac resynchronization therapy
24 months
Study Arms (1)
Heart failure patients
Patients with a CRT device according to current guidelines
Interventions
Any commercially available Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy devices with or without defibrillation backup (CRT-D/CRT-P) can be used upon discretion of the investigator according to current guidelines
Eligibility Criteria
All patients eligible for CRT device implanted according to current guidelines
You may qualify if:
- Chronic symptomatic HF despite stable, optimal drug therapy
- Indication for a cardiac resynchronisation device with or without defibrillator backup according to current guidelines
- Patients implanted with cardiac resynchronization device
You may not qualify if:
- Patients participating in other studies that clearly impact the clinical practice of the center
- Patients who are unable to provide informed consent
- Patients who can not perform follow-up in the center
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (12)
Ospedale Degli Infermi
Biella, Biella, 61679, Italy
San Giacomo e Cristoforo
Massa, Massa, 54100, Italy
Azienda Ospedaliera di Padova
Padua, Padova, 61353, Italy
Azienda Ospedaliera San Salvatore
Pesaro, Pesaro, 61998, Italy
Cardiovascular Department, Electrophysiology Unit, Istituto Ospedaliero Fondazione Poliambulanza
Brescia, 25124, Italy
Department of Heart and Vessels, University of Florence
Florence, 50134, Italy
Department of Cardiology and Coronary Care Unit, Azienda Ospedaliera S. Antonio Abate
Gallarate, 21013, Italy
Department of Cardio, Thoracic and Vascular, Azienda Ospedaliera Carlo Poma
Mantova, 46100, Italy
Department of Heart, Electrophysiology, Clinica Mediterranea
Naples, 80122, Italy
Azienda Ospedale dei Colli - Monaldi
Napoli, 80131, Italy
Policlinico Federico II
Napoli, Italy
Department of Cardiology, Ospedale Civile "Misericordia e Dolce"
Prato, 59100, Italy
Related Publications (3)
Bertaglia E, Reggiani A, Palmisano P, D'Onofrio A, De Simone A, Caico SI, Pecora D, Arena G, Marini M, Ricciardi G, Badolati S, Spotti A, Solimene F, Ferraro A, Migliore F, Botto GL, Malacrida M, Stabile G. The stricter criteria for Class I CRT indication suggested by the 2016 ESC Guidelines reliably exclude patients with a worse prognosis in comparison with the 2013 ESC indication criteria. Int J Cardiol. 2018 Dec 15;273:162-167. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2018.09.027. Epub 2018 Sep 8.
PMID: 30217421DERIVEDStabile G, Pepi P, Palmisano P, D'Onofrio A, De Simone A, Caico SI, Pecora D, Rapacciuolo A, Arena G, Marini M, Pieragnoli P, Badolati S, Savarese G, Maglia G, Iuliano A, Botto GL, Malacrida M, Bertaglia E. Adherence to 2016 European Society of Cardiology guidelines predicts outcome in a large real-world population of heart failure patients requiring cardiac resynchronization therapy. Heart Rhythm. 2018 Nov;15(11):1675-1682. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2018.04.011. Epub 2018 Apr 14.
PMID: 29665405DERIVEDStabile G, D'Onofrio A, Pepi P, De Simone A, Santamaria M, Caico SI, Rapacciuolo A, Padeletti L, Pecora D, Giovannini T, Arena G, Spotti A, Iuliano A, Bertaglia E, Malacrida M, Botto GL. Interlead anatomic and electrical distance predict outcome in CRT patients. Heart Rhythm. 2015 Nov;12(11):2221-9. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2015.05.020. Epub 2015 May 19.
PMID: 26001509DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY CHAIR
Luigi Padeletti, MD
Department of Heart and Vessels, University of Florence, Florence, Italy.
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- COHORT
- Time Perspective
- PROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Principal Investigator
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
April 2, 2012
First Posted
April 6, 2012
Study Start
December 1, 2011
Primary Completion
December 1, 2015
Study Completion
December 1, 2015
Last Updated
February 24, 2017
Record last verified: 2017-02
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share