NCT01572584

Brief Summary

Background

  • Assessment of the percentage of lung collapse is crucial in the therapeutic decision-making of pneumothorax.
  • The methods normally used to this purpose are radiological. Computerized tomography scan (CT) is highly accurate because it allows the exact evaluation of the volume of the air layer. However, in clinical practice assessment of the volume of pneumothorax mainly relies on the measurement of the inter-pleural distance at conventional chest radiography (CXR). This latter method is inaccurate.
  • Lung ultrasound is a new method highly accurate in the first diagnosis of pneumothorax, with a sensitivity superior to CXR and similar to CT in case of traumatic pneumothorax.
  • The scientific community is actually debating about the usefulness of lung ultrasound in the quantification of pneumothorax \[\]. Lung ultrasound can assess the superficial extension of the pneumothorax, but cannot evaluate its volume. Aim
  • Main purpose of the study is to compare measurement of the superficial extension of pneumothorax on the chest wall obtained by lung ultrasound, to the evaluation of the air volume performed by CT in patients with pneumothorax.
  • The main hypothesis of the study is that the cut-off between small (\<11% of lung collapse) and large (\>11% of lung collapse) pneumothorax can be identified by a lung ultrasound evaluation of the superficial extension of pneumothorax.
  • Second purpose of the study is to compare the accuracies of lung ultrasound and CXR in predicting the volume of pneumothorax assessed by CT.
  • Secondary hypothesis is that lung ultrasound demonstrates greater accuracy in the prediction of volume of pneumothorax and percentage of lung collapse. Methods
  • Patients with a diagnosis of pneumothorax confirmed at CT are prospectively enrolled and submitted to lung ultrasound within 20 min from the CT study.
  • Different locations of the sonographic "lung point" on the chest wall (i.e. the point on the chest wall where the sonographic pattern of the normally aerated lung alternates with the pathologic sonographic pattern of pneumothorax) are compared with different volumes of pneumothorax measured by CT.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
115

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for all trials

Timeline
Completed

Started Dec 2011

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

December 1, 2011

Completed
4 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

April 4, 2012

Completed
2 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

April 6, 2012

Completed
1.7 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

December 1, 2013

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

December 1, 2013

Completed
Last Updated

December 19, 2013

Status Verified

December 1, 2013

Enrollment Period

2 years

First QC Date

April 4, 2012

Last Update Submit

December 18, 2013

Conditions

Keywords

PneumothoraxLung ultrasoundChest sonography

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • The ultrasound lung point on the thorax wall versus the volume of pneumothorax at CT scan

    The ultrasound lung point that the best discriminates a pneumothorax volume more than 11%

Eligibility Criteria

Age16 Years - 90 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsChild (0-17), Adult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)
Sampling MethodProbability Sample
Study Population

Patients from the Emergency Department Patients admitted to the Hospital Outpatients from the Radiology Department who undergo invasive thoracic procedures

You may qualify if:

  • Radiologic diagnosis of pneumothorax
  • Clinical need to perform a CT scan
  • Ability to perform the lung ultrasound imaging within 20 minutes from the CT study

You may not qualify if:

  • age less than 16 years

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

San Luigi Gonzaga University Hospital

Orbassano, Torino, 10043, Italy

Location

Related Publications (7)

  • Blaivas M, Lyon M, Duggal S. A prospective comparison of supine chest radiography and bedside ultrasound for the diagnosis of traumatic pneumothorax. Acad Emerg Med. 2005 Sep;12(9):844-9. doi: 10.1197/j.aem.2005.05.005.

    PMID: 16141018BACKGROUND
  • Soldati G, Testa A, Sher S, Pignataro G, La Sala M, Silveri NG. Occult traumatic pneumothorax: diagnostic accuracy of lung ultrasonography in the emergency department. Chest. 2008 Jan;133(1):204-11. doi: 10.1378/chest.07-1595. Epub 2007 Oct 9.

    PMID: 17925411BACKGROUND
  • Reissig A, Kroegel C. Accuracy of transthoracic sonography in excluding post-interventional pneumothorax and hydropneumothorax. Comparison to chest radiography. Eur J Radiol. 2005 Mar;53(3):463-70. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2004.04.014.

    PMID: 15741021BACKGROUND
  • Lichtenstein D, Meziere G, Biderman P, Gepner A. The "lung point": an ultrasound sign specific to pneumothorax. Intensive Care Med. 2000 Oct;26(10):1434-40. doi: 10.1007/s001340000627.

    PMID: 11126253BACKGROUND
  • Baumann MH, Strange C, Heffner JE, Light R, Kirby TJ, Klein J, Luketich JD, Panacek EA, Sahn SA; AACP Pneumothorax Consensus Group. Management of spontaneous pneumothorax: an American College of Chest Physicians Delphi consensus statement. Chest. 2001 Feb;119(2):590-602. doi: 10.1378/chest.119.2.590.

    PMID: 11171742BACKGROUND
  • Engdahl O, Toft T, Boe J. Chest radiograph--a poor method for determining the size of a pneumothorax. Chest. 1993 Jan;103(1):26-9. doi: 10.1378/chest.103.1.26.

    PMID: 8417891BACKGROUND
  • Volpicelli G, Elbarbary M, Blaivas M, Lichtenstein DA, Mathis G, Kirkpatrick AW, Melniker L, Gargani L, Noble VE, Via G, Dean A, Tsung JW, Soldati G, Copetti R, Bouhemad B, Reissig A, Agricola E, Rouby JJ, Arbelot C, Liteplo A, Sargsyan A, Silva F, Hoppmann R, Breitkreutz R, Seibel A, Neri L, Storti E, Petrovic T; International Liaison Committee on Lung Ultrasound (ILC-LUS) for International Consensus Conference on Lung Ultrasound (ICC-LUS). International evidence-based recommendations for point-of-care lung ultrasound. Intensive Care Med. 2012 Apr;38(4):577-91. doi: 10.1007/s00134-012-2513-4. Epub 2012 Mar 6.

    PMID: 22392031BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Pneumothorax

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Pleural DiseasesRespiratory Tract Diseases

Study Officials

  • Giovanni Volpicelli, MD

    San Luigi Gonzaga Hospital

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
observational
Observational Model
CASE ONLY
Time Perspective
PROSPECTIVE
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Medical Doctor, Department of Emergency Medicine

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

April 4, 2012

First Posted

April 6, 2012

Study Start

December 1, 2011

Primary Completion

December 1, 2013

Study Completion

December 1, 2013

Last Updated

December 19, 2013

Record last verified: 2013-12

Locations