NCT01570166

Brief Summary

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the fifth most common cancer in the world. Partial hepatectomy is still considered as the conventional therapy for HCC. Intrahepatic recurrence of HCC after partial hepatectomy is common and was reported to be more than 77% within 5 years after surgery. Repeat hepatectomy is an effective treatment for intrahepatic HCC recurrence, with a 5-year survival rate of 19.4-56%. This is comparable to the survival after initial hepatectomy for HCC. Unfortunately, repeat hepatectomy could be carried out only in a small proportion of patients with HCC recurrence (10.4-31%), either because of the poor functional liver reserve or because of widespread intrahepatic recurrence. In the past two decades, percutaneous radiofrequency ablation (PRFA) has emerged as a new treatment modality and has attracted great interest because of its effectiveness and safety for small HCC (≤ 5.0 cm). Studies using PRFA to treat recurrent HCC after partial hepatectomy reported a 3-year survival rate of 62-68%, which is comparable to those achieved by surgery. PRFA is particularly suitable to treat recurrent HCC after partial hepatectomy because these tumors are usually detected when they are small and PRFA causes the least deterioration of liver function in the patients. To the best of our knowledge, there has been no report published in the medical literature comparing the efficacy of repeat hepatectomy with PRFA for recurrent HCC. The aim of this retrospective study is to compare the outcome of repeat hepatectomy with PRFA for small recurrent HCC after partial hepatectomy.

Trial Health

43
At Risk

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Trial has exceeded expected completion date
Enrollment
210

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for not_applicable hepatocellular-carcinoma

Timeline
Completed

Started Nov 2011

Longer than P75 for not_applicable hepatocellular-carcinoma

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
unknown

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

November 1, 2011

Completed
5 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

March 28, 2012

Completed
7 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

April 4, 2012

Completed
6.9 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

March 1, 2019

Completed
4 years until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

March 1, 2023

Completed
Last Updated

June 26, 2019

Status Verified

June 1, 2019

Enrollment Period

7.3 years

First QC Date

March 28, 2012

Last Update Submit

June 24, 2019

Conditions

Keywords

Hepatocellular CarcinomaRFAHR

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • overall survival

    5-year

Secondary Outcomes (1)

  • disease-free survival

    5-year

Study Arms (2)

RFA

EXPERIMENTAL

For RFA, we used a commercially available system with a 375-KHz computer-assisted radiofrequency generator (Elektrotom HiTT 106, Berchtold, Medizinelektronik, Germany) and an open-perfused electrode (Berchtold, Tuttlingen, Germany) of 15 cm (or 20 cm), 14 Ga, and a 15 mm (or 20 mm) active electrode tip with microbores.

Procedure: HR

HR group

EXPERIMENTAL

HR was carried out under general anesthesia using a right subcostal incision with a midline extension.Intra-operative ultrasonography was performed routinely to evaluate the tumor burden, liver remnant, and the possibility of a negative resection margin. Anatomic resection, in the form of segmentectomy and/or subsegmentectomy as described by Makuuchi et al. (16) was the preferred surgical method of liver resection. Pringle's maneuver was routinely used with a clamp and unclamp time of 10 min and 5 min, respectively; this technique was used repeatedly throughout the entire procedure. Hemostasis of the raw liver surface was done with suturing and application of fibrin glue.

Procedure: RFA

Interventions

HRPROCEDURE

HR was carried out under general anesthesia using a right subcostal incision with a midline extension. Intra-operative ultrasonography was performed routinely to evaluate the tumor burden, liver remnant, and the possibility of a negative resection margin. Anatomic resection, in the form of segmentectomy and/or subsegmentectomy as described by Makuuchi et al. (16) was the preferred surgical method of liver resection. Pringle's maneuver was routinely used with a clamp and unclamp time of 10 min and 5 min, respectively; this technique was used repeatedly throughout the entire procedure.

Also known as: hepatic resection; surgical resection
RFA
RFAPROCEDURE

For PRFA, we used a commercially available system with a 375-KHz computer-assisted radiofrequency generator (Elektrotom HiTT 106, Berchtold, Medizinelektronik, Germany) and an open-perfused electrode (Berchtold, Tuttlingen, Germany) of 15 cm (or 20 cm), 14 Ga, and a 15 mm (or 20 mm) active electrode tip with microbores.

Also known as: percutenous ablation
HR group

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 75 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • age 18 - 75 years;
  • Distant recurrence of HCC after initial curative treatment (including initial RFA or hepatectomy);
  • no other treatment received except for the initial RFA or hepatectomy;
  • Single tumor less than 4cm in diameter;
  • lesions visible on ultrasound and with an acceptable and safe path between the lesion and the skin as shown on ultrasound;
  • no severe coagulation disorders (prothrombin activity \< 40% or a platelet count of \< 40,000 / mm3;
  • Eastern Co-operative Oncology Group performance(ECOG) status 0 -

You may not qualify if:

  • the presence of vascular invasion or extrahepatic spread on imaging;
  • a Child-Pugh class C liver cirrhosis or evidence of hepatic decompensation including ascites, severe coagulation disorders (prothrombin activity \< 40% or a platelet count of \< 40,000 / mm3), esophageal or gastric variceal bleeding or hepatic encephalopathy;
  • an American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score ≥ 3

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Cancer Center, Sun Yat-set University

Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510060, China

Location

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Carcinoma, Hepatocellular

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

AdenocarcinomaCarcinomaNeoplasms, Glandular and EpithelialNeoplasms by Histologic TypeNeoplasmsLiver NeoplasmsDigestive System NeoplasmsNeoplasms by SiteDigestive System DiseasesLiver Diseases

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
FACTORIAL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
professor

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

March 28, 2012

First Posted

April 4, 2012

Study Start

November 1, 2011

Primary Completion

March 1, 2019

Study Completion

March 1, 2023

Last Updated

June 26, 2019

Record last verified: 2019-06

Locations