NCT01564862

Brief Summary

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effects of Lu AA21004, once daily (QD), on cognitive dysfunction in patients with major depressive disorder.

Trial Health

93
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
602

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for phase_2

Timeline
Completed

Started Apr 2012

Geographic Reach
7 countries

92 active sites

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

March 26, 2012

Completed
2 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

March 28, 2012

Completed
4 days until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

April 1, 2012

Completed
1.8 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

February 1, 2014

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

February 1, 2014

Completed
1 year until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

February 5, 2015

Completed
Last Updated

February 5, 2015

Status Verified

February 1, 2015

Enrollment Period

1.8 years

First QC Date

March 26, 2012

Results QC Date

January 13, 2015

Last Update Submit

February 4, 2015

Conditions

Keywords

Drug Therapy

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Change From Baseline to Week 8 in the Digit Symbol Substitution Test (DSST)

    The DSST assesses relative contributions of speed, memory, executive function and visual scanning. Participants are required to copy symbols that are paired with simple geometric shapes or numbers within a specific time for a total possible score of 0 to 133. Higher scores-correct number of symbols reflects greater objective cognitive functioning. An increase in score represents an improvement in an integrated measure of cognitive function. An Analysis of Covariance (ANCOVA) model was used with treatment and center as fixed factors and the Baseline value as a covariate.

    Baseline and Week 8

Secondary Outcomes (14)

  • Change From Baseline to Week 8 in the Perceived Deficits Questionnaire (PDQ) Attention/Concentration and Planning/Organization Subscore

    Baseline and Week 8

  • Clinical Global Impressions-Improvement (CGI-I) Score at Week 8

    Baseline, Week 8

  • Change From Baseline to Week 8 in the Trail Making Test (TMT-A)

    Baseline and Week 8

  • Change From Baseline to Week 8 in the Trail Making Test B (TMT-B)

    Baseline and Week 8

  • Change in Time From Baseline to Week 8 in the Stroop Test

    Baseline and Week 8

  • +9 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (3)

Vortioxetine (Lu AA21004) QD

EXPERIMENTAL

Vortioxetine (Lu AA21004) 10 mg, capsules, orally, once daily for one week; then dose adjustment to a maximum 20 mg, capsules, orally, once daily for up to 7 weeks.

Drug: vortioxetine (Lu AA21004)

Duloxetine QD

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Duloxetine 60 mg, capsules, orally, for up to 8 weeks. Duloxetine 30 mg, capsule, orally, once daily for 1 week taper-down period.

Drug: Duloxetine

Placebo QD

PLACEBO COMPARATOR

Placebo matching capsules, orally, once daily for up to 9 weeks (includes 1 week taper down period).

Drug: Placebo

Interventions

Lu AA21004 capsules

Vortioxetine (Lu AA21004) QD

Duloxetine capsules

Also known as: Cymbalta
Duloxetine QD

Placebo matching capsules

Placebo QD

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 65 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • In the opinion of the investigator, the participant is capable of understanding and complying with protocol requirements.
  • The participant or, when applicable, the participant's legally acceptable representative signs and dates a written, informed consent form and any required privacy authorization prior to the initiation of any study procedures.
  • The participant has recurrent MDD as the primary diagnosis according to Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition, Text Revision (DSM-IV-TR) criteria (classification code 296.3x). The current MDE should be confirmed using the Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview (MINI) V6.0.0.
  • The participant has received prescribed treatment for a previous episode of depression.
  • The participant has a MADRS total score ≥26 at both the screening and baseline visits.
  • Participant reports subjective cognitive dysfunction (such as difficulty concentrating, slow thinking, and difficulty in learning new things or remembering things).
  • The reported duration of the current major depressive episode (MDE) is at least 3 months
  • The participant is a man or woman between 18 and 65 years old, inclusive.
  • A female participant of childbearing potential who is sexually active with a nonsterilized male partner agrees to routinely use adequate contraception from signing of the informed consent throughout the duration of the study and for 30 days after completion of the study.

You may not qualify if:

  • The participant has previously participated in this study.
  • The participant has a history of severe drug allergy or hypersensitivity, or known hypersensitivity to any of the excipients of the investigational medicinal product (IMP).
  • The participant has known hypersensitivity to duloxetine.
  • The participant has hereditary problems of fructose intolerance, glucose-galactose malabsorption, or sucrose-isomaltase insufficiency.
  • The participant is an immediate family member, study site employee, or is in a dependent relationship with a study site employee who is involved in the conduct of this study (e.g., spouse, parent, child, sibling) or may consent under duress.
  • The participant has a score ≥70 on the DSST (numbers correct) at the Baseline Visit.
  • The participant is, in the opinion of the investigator, not able to complete the neuropsychological tests validly at the Baseline Visit.
  • If female, the participant is pregnant or lactating or intending to become pregnant before, during, or within 30 days after participating in this study; or intending to donate ova during such time period.
  • The participant has 1 or more of the following:
  • Any current psychiatric disorder other than MDD as defined in the DSM-IV-TR (as assessed by the MINI Version 6.0.0).
  • Current or history of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), pervasive developmental disorder, manic or hypomanic episode, schizophrenia, or any other psychotic disorder, including major depression with psychotic features, mental retardation, organic mental disorders, or mental disorders due to a general medical condition as defined in the DSM-IV-TR.
  • Current diagnosis of alcohol or other substance abuse or dependence (excluding nicotine or caffeine) as defined in the DSM-IV-TR that has not been in sustained full remission for at least 2 years prior to Screening. (Participant must also have negative urine drug screen prior to Baseline).
  • Presence or history of a clinically significant neurological disorder (including epilepsy).
  • Neurodegenerative disorder (Alzheimer's disease, Parkinson's disease, multiple sclerosis, Huntington's disease, etc).
  • Any DSM-IV Axis II disorder that might compromise the study.
  • +27 more criteria

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (92)

Unknown Facility

Tucson, Arizona, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Little Rock, Arkansas, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Bellflower, California, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Carson, California, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Cerritos, California, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Glendale, California, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Imperial, California, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Los Angeles, California, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Norwalk, California, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Oakland, California, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Paramount, California, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

San Bernardino, California, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Santa Ana, California, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Wildomar, California, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Colorado Springs, Colorado, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Denver, Colorado, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Norwalk, Connecticut, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Lauderhill, Florida, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Miami, Florida, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Orlando, Florida, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Sanford, Florida, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

St. Petersburg, Florida, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Tampa, Florida, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

West Palm Beach, Florida, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Chicago, Illinois, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Hoffman Estates, Illinois, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Naperville, Illinois, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Oak Brook, Illinois, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Skokie, Illinois, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Indianapolis, Indiana, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Prairie Village, Kansas, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Shreveport, Louisiana, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Baltimore, Maryland, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Haverhill, Massachusetts, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

St Louis, Missouri, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

North Platte, Nebraska, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Las Vegas, Nevada, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Buffalo, New York, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

New York, New York, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Staten Island, New York, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Avon Lake, Ohio, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Beachwood, Ohio, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Garfield Heights, Ohio, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Toledo, Ohio, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Portland, Oregon, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Allentown, Pennsylvania, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Norristown, Pennsylvania, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Columbia, South Carolina, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Franklin, Tennessee, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Memphis, Tennessee, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Dallas, Texas, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Houston, Texas, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

San Antonio, Texas, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

The Woodlands, Texas, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Orem, Utah, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Salt Lake City, Utah, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Kirkland, Washington, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Seattle, Washington, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Brown Deer, Wisconsin, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Milwaukee, Wisconsin, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Kazanlak, Bulgaria

Location

Unknown Facility

Novi Iskar, Bulgaria

Location

Unknown Facility

Pleven, Bulgaria

Location

Unknown Facility

Plovdiv, Bulgaria

Location

Unknown Facility

Sofia, Bulgaria

Location

Unknown Facility

Tzerova Koria, Bulgaria

Location

Unknown Facility

Helsinki, Finland

Location

Unknown Facility

Kuopio, Finland

Location

Unknown Facility

Turku, Finland

Location

Unknown Facility

Berlin, Germany

Location

Unknown Facility

Bochum, Germany

Location

Unknown Facility

Chemnitz, Germany

Location

Unknown Facility

Hanover, Germany

Location

Unknown Facility

München, Germany

Location

Unknown Facility

Schwerin, Germany

Location

Unknown Facility

Westerstede, Germany

Location

Unknown Facility

Wiesbaden, Germany

Location

Unknown Facility

Bialystok, Poland

Location

Unknown Facility

Leszno, Poland

Location

Unknown Facility

Lodz, Poland

Location

Unknown Facility

Torun, Poland

Location

Unknown Facility

Nizhny Novgorod, Russia

Location

Unknown Facility

Saint Petersburg, Russia

Location

Unknown Facility

Smolensk, Russia

Location

Unknown Facility

Stavropol, Russia

Location

Unknown Facility

Yekaterinburg, Russia

Location

Unknown Facility

Kharkiv, Ukraine

Location

Unknown Facility

Kyiv, Ukraine

Location

Unknown Facility

Luhansk, Ukraine

Location

Unknown Facility

Ternopil, Ukraine

Location

Related Publications (6)

  • Jacobson W, Zhong W, Nomikos GG, Christensen MC, Kurre Olsen C, Harvey PD. Effects of vortioxetine on functional capacity across different levels of functional impairment in patients with major depressive disorder: a University of California, San Diego Performance-based Skills Assessment (UPSA) analysis. Curr Med Res Opin. 2020 Jan;36(1):117-124. doi: 10.1080/03007995.2019.1657692. Epub 2019 Aug 29.

  • Christensen MC, Sluth LB, McIntyre RS. Validation of the University of California San Diego Performance-based Skills Assessment (UPSA) in major depressive disorder: Replication and extension of initial findings. J Affect Disord. 2019 Feb 15;245:508-516. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2018.11.034. Epub 2018 Nov 5.

  • Christensen MC, Loft H, McIntyre RS. Vortioxetine improves symptomatic and functional outcomes in major depressive disorder: A novel dual outcome measure in depressive disorders. J Affect Disord. 2018 Feb;227:787-794. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2017.11.081. Epub 2017 Nov 16.

  • Keefe RSE, Nomikos G, Zhong W, Christensen MC, Jacobson W. A Subgroup Analysis of the Impact of Vortioxetine on Functional Capacity, as Measured by UPSA, in Patients with Major Depressive Disorder and Subjective Cognitive Dysfunction. Int J Neuropsychopharmacol. 2018 May 1;21(5):442-447. doi: 10.1093/ijnp/pyy020.

  • Christensen MC, Munro V. Cost per successfully treated patient for vortioxetine versus duloxetine in adults with major depressive disorder: an analysis of the complete symptoms of depression and functional outcome. Curr Med Res Opin. 2018 Apr;34(4):593-600. doi: 10.1080/03007995.2017.1416952. Epub 2018 Jan 16.

  • Harvey PD, Jacobson W, Zhong W, Nomikos GG, Cronquist Christensen M, Kurre Olsen C, Merikle E. Determination of a clinically important difference and definition of a responder threshold for the UCSD performance-based skills assessment (UPSA) in patients with major depressive disorder. J Affect Disord. 2017 Apr 15;213:105-111. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2017.02.014. Epub 2017 Feb 14.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Depressive Disorder, Major

Interventions

VortioxetineDuloxetine Hydrochloride

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Depressive DisorderMood DisordersMental Disorders

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

PiperazinesHeterocyclic Compounds, 1-RingHeterocyclic CompoundsThiophenesSulfur CompoundsOrganic Chemicals

Results Point of Contact

Title
Medical Director
Organization
Takeda

Study Officials

  • Senior Medical Director Clinical Science

    Takeda

    STUDY DIRECTOR

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
No
Restriction Type
OTHER
Restrictive Agreement
Yes

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 2
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
QUADRUPLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

March 26, 2012

First Posted

March 28, 2012

Study Start

April 1, 2012

Primary Completion

February 1, 2014

Study Completion

February 1, 2014

Last Updated

February 5, 2015

Results First Posted

February 5, 2015

Record last verified: 2015-02

Locations