Research of the Key Technology and Standardization of Minimal Invasive Treatment for Hepatolithiasis
Comparison of Laparoscopic Versus Open Operation for Hepatolithiasis
2 other identifiers
interventional
100
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The purpose of this research is to investigate the key technology and the related issues of minimal invasive treatment for hepatolithiasis and to build new methods of minimal invasive operation for hepatolithiasis. The validity, feasibility and limitations of the laparoscopic operation were assessed objectively through our clinical prospective study. The technique points, indications and contraindications were summarized to evaluate the status and role of minimal invasive laparoscopic operation in the treatment of hepatolithiasis.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Jan 2012
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
January 1, 2012
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 21, 2012
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 27, 2012
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 1, 2017
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 1, 2017
CompletedOctober 10, 2012
October 1, 2012
5.9 years
March 21, 2012
October 8, 2012
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Number of participants with residual stones or cholangitis symptoms
Liver function, recurrence rate, cholangitis symptoms, quality of life and survival time were collected and analysed to evaluate the postoperative curative effect. The follow up interval time: every six months.
up to 5 years postoperation
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Number of participants with operation complication
Duration hospitalization(an expected average of 2 weeks) to 2 months postoperation
Study Arms (2)
Laparoscopic operation
EXPERIMENTALTotal laparoscopic anatomical hepatectomy were performed, combined with cholecystectomy and bile duct exploration when necessary. The intraoperative ultrasound, choledochoscope and hepatic segmental staining were used selectively.
Open operation
ACTIVE COMPARATORThe traditional open regular hepatectomy were performed, combined with cholecystectomy and bile duct exploration when necessary. The intraoperative ultrasound and choledochoscope were used selectively.
Interventions
Fifty patients with early regional hepatolithiasis were selected and divided into laparoscopic hepatectomy group as described in the detailed description. Total laparoscopic anatomical hepatectomy were performed, combined with cholecystectomy and bile duct exploration when necessary. The intraoperative ultrasound, choledochoscope and hepatic segmental staining were used selectively.
Fifty patients with early regional hepatolithiasis were selected and divided into open group as described in the detailed description. The traditional open regular hepatectomy were performed, combined with cholecystectomy and bile duct exploration when necessary. The intraoperative ultrasound and choledochoscope were used selectively.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patients with regional stones distributed in a segment, lobe or half liver, combined or not combined with extrahepatic biliary calculi, hepatic parenchymal atrophy or fibrosis in the lesion region
- Liver function \> Child-pugh level B, no severe biliary cirrhosis, ICG ≤ 15%, the residual liver volume and standard liver volume ratio ≥ 40%
- Patients with good general condition, the conditions of open Anatomical Hepatectomy were achieved
You may not qualify if:
- Written informed consent
- Age: older than 70 years old, younger than 18 years old
- Patients with bad general condition or important organ lesions, liver resection could not be tolerated
- Complicated case needed to get emergency operation
- Combined with severe liver atrophy hypertrophy syndrome, hepatic portal transposition or hilar biliary fibrosis / stenosis
- Combined with severe biliary cirrhosis and portal hypertension, severe varicose of hepatic portal vein , hepatic insufficiency
- Diagnosed with cholangiocellular carcinoma intraoperatively or by postoperative pathology
- Contraindication of laparoscopy: Combined with complicated acute cholangitis, repeated biliary tract operation, heavy intra-abdominal adhesion, Trocar can not be placed in. Artificial pneumoperitoneum could not be tolerated
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Shuguo Zheng, MDlead
Study Sites (1)
Institute of Hepatobiliary Surgery ,Southwest Hospital ,Third Military Medical University
Chongqing, Chongqing Municipality, 400038, China
Related Publications (9)
Uchiyama K, Kawai M, Ueno M, Ozawa S, Tani M, Yamaue H. Reducing residual and recurrent stones by hepatectomy for hepatolithiasis. J Gastrointest Surg. 2007 May;11(5):626-30. doi: 10.1007/s11605-006-0024-8.
PMID: 17468921BACKGROUNDLee SK, Seo DW, Myung SJ, Park ET, Lim BC, Kim HJ, Yoo KS, Park HJ, Joo YH, Kim MH, Min YI. Percutaneous transhepatic cholangioscopic treatment for hepatolithiasis: an evaluation of long-term results and risk factors for recurrence. Gastrointest Endosc. 2001 Mar;53(3):318-23. doi: 10.1016/s0016-5107(01)70405-1.
PMID: 11231390BACKGROUNDUenishi T, Hamba H, Takemura S, Oba K, Ogawa M, Yamamoto T, Tanaka S, Kubo S. Outcomes of hepatic resection for hepatolithiasis. Am J Surg. 2009 Aug;198(2):199-202. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2008.08.020. Epub 2009 Feb 27.
PMID: 19249730BACKGROUNDOtani K, Shimizu S, Chijiiwa K, Ogawa T, Morisaki T, Sugitani A, Yamaguchi K, Tanaka M. Comparison of treatments for hepatolithiasis: hepatic resection versus cholangioscopic lithotomy. J Am Coll Surg. 1999 Aug;189(2):177-82. doi: 10.1016/s1072-7515(99)00109-x.
PMID: 10437840BACKGROUNDBuell JF, Cherqui D, Geller DA, O'Rourke N, Iannitti D, Dagher I, Koffron AJ, Thomas M, Gayet B, Han HS, Wakabayashi G, Belli G, Kaneko H, Ker CG, Scatton O, Laurent A, Abdalla EK, Chaudhury P, Dutson E, Gamblin C, D'Angelica M, Nagorney D, Testa G, Labow D, Manas D, Poon RT, Nelson H, Martin R, Clary B, Pinson WC, Martinie J, Vauthey JN, Goldstein R, Roayaie S, Barlet D, Espat J, Abecassis M, Rees M, Fong Y, McMasters KM, Broelsch C, Busuttil R, Belghiti J, Strasberg S, Chari RS; World Consensus Conference on Laparoscopic Surgery. The international position on laparoscopic liver surgery: The Louisville Statement, 2008. Ann Surg. 2009 Nov;250(5):825-30. doi: 10.1097/sla.0b013e3181b3b2d8.
PMID: 19916210BACKGROUNDLai EC, Ngai TC, Yang GP, Li MK. Laparoscopic approach of surgical treatment for primary hepatolithiasis: a cohort study. Am J Surg. 2010 May;199(5):716-21. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2009.02.007. Epub 2009 Dec 3.
PMID: 19959158BACKGROUNDCho JY, Han HS, Yoon YS, Shin SH. Experiences of laparoscopic liver resection including lesions in the posterosuperior segments of the liver. Surg Endosc. 2008 Nov;22(11):2344-9. doi: 10.1007/s00464-008-9966-0. Epub 2008 Jun 5.
PMID: 18528623BACKGROUNDZhang L, Chen YJ, Shang CZ, Zhang HW, Huang ZJ. Total laparoscopic liver resection in 78 patients. World J Gastroenterol. 2009 Dec 7;15(45):5727-31. doi: 10.3748/wjg.15.5727.
PMID: 19960572BACKGROUNDNguyen KT, Gamblin TC, Geller DA. World review of laparoscopic liver resection-2,804 patients. Ann Surg. 2009 Nov;250(5):831-41. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181b0c4df.
PMID: 19801936BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Shuguo Zheng, MD
Institute of Hepatobiliary Surgery ,Southwest Hospital ,Third Military Medical University
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Professor of Hepatobiliary Surgery Institute; Chief Physician; Administrator of laparoscopic department;
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 21, 2012
First Posted
March 27, 2012
Study Start
January 1, 2012
Primary Completion
December 1, 2017
Study Completion
December 1, 2017
Last Updated
October 10, 2012
Record last verified: 2012-10