Biliary Stones
10
2
3
4
Key Insights
Highlights
Success Rate
100% trial completion (above average)
Clinical Risk Assessment
Based on trial outcomes
Moderate Risk
Score: 50/100
0.0%
0 terminated out of 10 trials
100.0%
+13.5% vs benchmark
0%
0 trials in Phase 3/4
25%
1 of 4 completed with results
Key Signals
Data Visualizations
Phase Distribution
Trial Status
Trial Success Rate
Benchmark: 86.5%
Based on 4 completed trials
Clinical Trials (10)
Percutaneous Cholangiopancreatoscopy Registry
Prophylactic Cholecystectomy in Midgut NETs Patients Who Require Primary Tumor Surgery.
Non-Complex Biliary Stones DSC vs ERC
Spyglass DS Peroral Cholangioscope Guided LL or EHL Versus BML for Endoscopic Removal of Complicated Bile Duct Stones
Single-stage ERCP and Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy for Cholecystocholedocholithiasis: Which to Start With?
Flare Type Self-expandable Metal Stents (SEMS) vs Plastic Stent for the Treatment of Difficult Common Bile Duct Stone
clınıcal Effects of High-flow Nasal Oxygen Use ın gerıatrıc patıents
Evaluation of Efficacy and Safety of Goff Transpancreatic Septotomy vs. Double Wire Technique for Achieving Biliary Access in Technically Challenging ERCPs
Percutaneous Endoscopic Biliary Exploration in Complex Biliary Stone Disease
Research of the Key Technology and Standardization of Minimal Invasive Treatment for Hepatolithiasis