Fractional Flow Reserve (FFR) Versus Instant Wave-Free Ratio (iFR)
Comparison of Fractional Flow Reserve Versus Instant Wave-Free Ratio for Assessment of Coronary Artery Stenosis Severity in Routine Practice
1 other identifier
observational
200
5 countries
5
Brief Summary
Comparison of Fractional Flow Reserve versus instant Wave-Free Ratio for assessment of coronary artery stenosis severity in routine practice
- To compare FFR to iFR in arbitrary consecutive patients referred for percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).
- To investigate the influence of hyperemia on iFR.
- To test reproducibility of iFR and FFR.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for all trials
Started Jan 2012
Shorter than P25 for all trials
5 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
January 1, 2012
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
February 1, 2012
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
February 1, 2012
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
February 14, 2012
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 21, 2012
CompletedMarch 21, 2012
March 1, 2012
1 month
February 14, 2012
March 19, 2012
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Comparison of Fractional Flow Reserve vs. instant Wave-Free Ratio for assessment of coronary artery stenosis severity in routine practice
In this prospective, multicenter, international investigation, all consecutive patients in 5 centers, referred for PCI will be included. FFR will be submitted for one vessel in each patient - this will be the first vessel in which the FFR is performed. Measurements will be performed in duplicate. iFR will be calculated for all lesions for which an FFR measurement is submitted. In addition, iFR and FFR will be compared retrospectively in 1000 patients who had FFR measurements in the recent past
30 days
Secondary Outcomes (2)
iFR at rest vs iFr during hyperemia
30 days
Repeatability of iFr and FFR
30 days
Study Arms (1)
FFR; iFR
Interventional Cardiology, Pressure wire, fractional flow reserve, coronary flow measurement
Eligibility Criteria
The aim of the present study is to strengthen the results of retrospective comparisons of iFR with FFR by conducting a prospective study in 200 consecutive, unselected patients from 5 different centers.
You may qualify if:
- all consecutive patients undergoing FFR assessment for standard clinical indications.
You may not qualify if:
- prior CABG
- extremely tortuous, calcified lesions
- coronary artery occlusion
- acute MI within 5 days
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- NHS National Waiting Times Centre Boardlead
- Golden Jubilee National Hospitalcollaborator
- Catharina Ziekenhuis Eindhovencollaborator
- Onze Lieve Vrouw Hospitalcollaborator
- Stockholm South General Hospitalcollaborator
- Brno University Hospitalcollaborator
- Stanford Universitycollaborator
Study Sites (5)
Stanford University
Stanford, California, United States
Cardiovascular Center Aalst
Aalst, Belgium
University Hospital Brno
Brno, Czechia
Catharina Ziekenhuis
Eindhoven, Netherlands
Stockholm South Hospital
Stockholm, Sweden
Related Publications (1)
Berry C, van 't Veer M, Witt N, Kala P, Bocek O, Pyxaras SA, McClure JD, Fearon WF, Barbato E, Tonino PA, De Bruyne B, Pijls NH, Oldroyd KG. VERIFY (VERification of Instantaneous Wave-Free Ratio and Fractional Flow Reserve for the Assessment of Coronary Artery Stenosis Severity in EverydaY Practice): a multicenter study in consecutive patients. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013 Apr 2;61(13):1421-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2012.09.065. Epub 2013 Feb 6.
PMID: 23395076DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Prof Keith G. Oldroyd
Golden Jubilee National Hospital
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Prof Colin Berry, MD
Golden Jubilee National Hospital
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- COHORT
- Time Perspective
- PROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Consultant Cardiologist
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
February 14, 2012
First Posted
March 21, 2012
Study Start
January 1, 2012
Primary Completion
February 1, 2012
Study Completion
February 1, 2012
Last Updated
March 21, 2012
Record last verified: 2012-03