NCT01559493

Brief Summary

Comparison of Fractional Flow Reserve versus instant Wave-Free Ratio for assessment of coronary artery stenosis severity in routine practice

  • To compare FFR to iFR in arbitrary consecutive patients referred for percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).
  • To investigate the influence of hyperemia on iFR.
  • To test reproducibility of iFR and FFR.

Trial Health

93
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
200

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for all trials

Timeline
Completed

Started Jan 2012

Shorter than P25 for all trials

Geographic Reach
5 countries

5 active sites

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

January 1, 2012

Completed
1 month until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

February 1, 2012

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

February 1, 2012

Completed
13 days until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

February 14, 2012

Completed
1 month until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

March 21, 2012

Completed
Last Updated

March 21, 2012

Status Verified

March 1, 2012

Enrollment Period

1 month

First QC Date

February 14, 2012

Last Update Submit

March 19, 2012

Conditions

Keywords

atherosclerotic lesion assessment

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Comparison of Fractional Flow Reserve vs. instant Wave-Free Ratio for assessment of coronary artery stenosis severity in routine practice

    In this prospective, multicenter, international investigation, all consecutive patients in 5 centers, referred for PCI will be included. FFR will be submitted for one vessel in each patient - this will be the first vessel in which the FFR is performed. Measurements will be performed in duplicate. iFR will be calculated for all lesions for which an FFR measurement is submitted. In addition, iFR and FFR will be compared retrospectively in 1000 patients who had FFR measurements in the recent past

    30 days

Secondary Outcomes (2)

  • iFR at rest vs iFr during hyperemia

    30 days

  • Repeatability of iFr and FFR

    30 days

Study Arms (1)

FFR; iFR

Interventional Cardiology, Pressure wire, fractional flow reserve, coronary flow measurement

Eligibility Criteria

Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsChild (0-17), Adult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)
Sampling MethodNon-Probability Sample
Study Population

The aim of the present study is to strengthen the results of retrospective comparisons of iFR with FFR by conducting a prospective study in 200 consecutive, unselected patients from 5 different centers.

You may qualify if:

  • all consecutive patients undergoing FFR assessment for standard clinical indications.

You may not qualify if:

  • prior CABG
  • extremely tortuous, calcified lesions
  • coronary artery occlusion
  • acute MI within 5 days

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (5)

Stanford University

Stanford, California, United States

Location

Cardiovascular Center Aalst

Aalst, Belgium

Location

University Hospital Brno

Brno, Czechia

Location

Catharina Ziekenhuis

Eindhoven, Netherlands

Location

Stockholm South Hospital

Stockholm, Sweden

Location

Related Publications (1)

  • Berry C, van 't Veer M, Witt N, Kala P, Bocek O, Pyxaras SA, McClure JD, Fearon WF, Barbato E, Tonino PA, De Bruyne B, Pijls NH, Oldroyd KG. VERIFY (VERification of Instantaneous Wave-Free Ratio and Fractional Flow Reserve for the Assessment of Coronary Artery Stenosis Severity in EverydaY Practice): a multicenter study in consecutive patients. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013 Apr 2;61(13):1421-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2012.09.065. Epub 2013 Feb 6.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Coronary Artery DiseasePlaque, Atherosclerotic

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Coronary DiseaseMyocardial IschemiaHeart DiseasesCardiovascular DiseasesArteriosclerosisArterial Occlusive DiseasesVascular DiseasesPathological Conditions, AnatomicalPathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms

Study Officials

  • Prof Keith G. Oldroyd

    Golden Jubilee National Hospital

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
  • Prof Colin Berry, MD

    Golden Jubilee National Hospital

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
observational
Observational Model
COHORT
Time Perspective
PROSPECTIVE
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Consultant Cardiologist

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

February 14, 2012

First Posted

March 21, 2012

Study Start

January 1, 2012

Primary Completion

February 1, 2012

Study Completion

February 1, 2012

Last Updated

March 21, 2012

Record last verified: 2012-03

Locations