NCT01559311

Brief Summary

The purpose of this clinical project is to evaluate the efficacy of the presence of Right Ventricular Apical (RVA) pacing induced ventricular dyssynchrony as a guiding parameter for bi-ventricular pacing in patients with bradycardia and normal left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). The results of this project may provide with the evidence based medicine for guidelines expansion of using Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) in patients with Heart Block and normal LVEF (LVEF \>45%).

Trial Health

93
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
98

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Feb 2012

Longer than P75 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
5 countries

7 active sites

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

February 1, 2012

Completed
2 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

March 19, 2012

Completed
2 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

March 21, 2012

Completed
3.6 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

November 1, 2015

Completed
5 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

April 1, 2016

Completed
7 months until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

October 31, 2016

Completed
Last Updated

February 4, 2019

Status Verified

January 1, 2019

Enrollment Period

3.8 years

First QC Date

March 19, 2012

Results QC Date

September 7, 2016

Last Update Submit

January 31, 2019

Conditions

Keywords

Bradycardia

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (2)

  • LVEF

    Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) for assessment of Left ventricular (LV) systolic function

    12 months

  • LVESV

    Left ventricular end-systolic volume (LVESV) for assessment of LV remodeling

    12 months

Study Arms (3)

CRT-P OFF

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Patients randomized into the Echo-guided Group were implanted with a CRT-P device (St. Jude Medical), which was programmed to DDDR pacing mode (CRT-P OFF) at implant. For each Echo-guided Group patient, presence of RVA pacing induced ventricular dyssynchrony was assessed within 24-hour of implant using the standardized criteria of Doppler echocardiography. The Echocardiography Core Laboratory (Echo Core Lab) then analyzed each image and the treatment allocation of the Echo-guided Group was done within 72-hour post implant based on the Echo Core Lab outcomes: • Patients with the absence of RVA pacing induced ventricular dyssynchrony were allocated to the DDDR standard therapy with CRT-P remained OFF

Device: CRT-P OFF

CRT-P ON

EXPERIMENTAL

Patients randomized into the Echo-guided Group were implanted with a CRT-P device (St. Jude Medical), which was programmed to DDDR pacing mode (CRT-P OFF) at implant. For each Echo-guided Group patient, presence of RVA pacing induced ventricular dyssynchrony was assessed within 24-hour of implant using the standardized criteria of Doppler echocardiography. The Echocardiography Core Laboratory (Echo Core Lab) then analyzed each image and the treatment allocation of the Echo-guided Group was done within 72-hour post implant based on the Echo Core Lab outcomes: • Patients with the presence of RVA pacing induced ventricular dyssynchrony were allocated to the CRT-P standard therapy with CRT-P turned ON

Device: CRT-P ON

DDDR

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Patients randomized into the Control Group were implanted with a DDDR device (St. Jude Medical) standard therapy.

Device: DDDR

Interventions

CRT-P OFFDEVICE

CRT Pacemaker

CRT-P OFF
CRT-P ONDEVICE

CRT Pacemaker

CRT-P ON
DDDRDEVICE

Dual-chamber, rate-modulated pacemaker

DDDR

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Patient meets current indications for implantation of a DDDR pacemaker
  • Patient is geographically stable and willing to comply with the required follow-up schedule
  • Patient has LVEF \>45%
  • Patient has atrioventricular block (IIo or above)
  • Patient has adequate echocardiographic images to measure LV volumes and LVEF

You may not qualify if:

  • Patient has permanent atrial fibrillation (AF)
  • Patient has unstable angina or an acute coronary syndrome
  • Patient has undergone percutaneous coronary intervention or coronary artery bypass surgery within the previous 3 months
  • Patient's life expectancy is less than 1 year
  • Patient is less than 18 years old
  • Patient is pregnant
  • Patient has received a heart transplant

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (7)

The Prince Charles Hospital

Chermside, Australia

Location

Prince of Wales Hospital

Hong Kong, China

Location

Madras Medical Mission

Chennai, India

Location

CARE Banjara

Hyderabad, India

Location

All India Institute of Medical Sciences

New Delhi, India

Location

Istituto Clinico Humanitas

Rozzano, Italy

Location

Siriraj Hospital

Bangkok, Thailand

Location

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Bradycardia

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Arrhythmias, CardiacHeart DiseasesCardiovascular DiseasesPathologic ProcessesPathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms

Limitations and Caveats

Sample size was not reached due to difficulty in enrollment.

Results Point of Contact

Title
Clinical Project Leader Asia
Organization
St. Jude Medical (Hong Kong) Ltd

Study Officials

  • Cheuk Man Yu, MD

    Department of Medicine and Therapeutics, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Prince of Wales Hospital, Shatin, New Territories, Hong Kong

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
No
Restriction Type
LTE60
Restrictive Agreement
Yes

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
SINGLE
Who Masked
OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Purpose
PREVENTION
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

March 19, 2012

First Posted

March 21, 2012

Study Start

February 1, 2012

Primary Completion

November 1, 2015

Study Completion

April 1, 2016

Last Updated

February 4, 2019

Results First Posted

October 31, 2016

Record last verified: 2019-01

Locations