A Clinical Trial of a Metal on Poly Component Versus CORAIL Stem: A Bone Mineral Density Study
A Randomized Clinical Trial of a Modular Cementless Acetabular Metal on Poly Component Versus a Monoblock Cementless Titanium Shell With Ceramic on Ceramic Bearing and CORAIL Stem: A Bone Mineral Density Study
1 other identifier
interventional
88
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The main goal is to prospectively evaluate bone mineral density adjacent to the femoral component and femoral bone remodeling of two different designs: CORAIL impaction broach titanium stem compared to a modular titanium femoral stem (Tri-lock). Patients will be randomized to one of the two treatment groups prior to surgery. Each patient will be evaluated at their regularly scheduled 10-14 days, 3, 6, 12 and 24 month visits following surgery. Patients will be asked to have bilateral DEXA bone mineral density tests (10-14 days post-surgery, and 6, 12 and 24 months post-operatively). Urine and serum samples (measures of bone turnover) will be collected at 3, 6 and 12 months post-operatively after an overnight fast. Patient reported questionnaires will be completed preoperatively and at the 3, 6, 12, and 24 month visits.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Apr 2010
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
April 1, 2010
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 16, 2012
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 20, 2012
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
July 31, 2019
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
November 20, 2020
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
December 19, 2020
CompletedDecember 19, 2020
November 1, 2020
9.3 years
March 16, 2012
November 23, 2020
November 23, 2020
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Change in Bone Mineral Density
To prospectively evaluate bone mineral density adjacent to the femoral component and femoral bone remodeling for the 2 groups. Bone mineral density was assessed using high-sensitivity dual x-ray absorptiometry region-free analysis (DXA-RFA). Mean number of pixels with change with significant BMD decrease.
2 Years Post-operative
Secondary Outcomes (6)
Comparison of Bone Turnover Markers Between Groups
2 Years post-operative
Implant Migration
2 years post-operative
Change in Modified Harris Hip Score
2 Years post-operative
Change in SF-36 Score
2 Years post-operative
Change in WOMAC Questionnaire
2 Years post-operative
- +1 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Titanium Shell with CORAIL stem
EXPERIMENTALPatients in Group 1 will receive a total hip replacement with titanium shell and CORAIL stem.
Modular Titanium Femoral Stem (Tri-Lock)
ACTIVE COMPARATORPatients in Group 2 will receive a total hip replacement with Modular Titanium Femoral Stem (Tri-lock).
Interventions
Patients that are randomized into Group 1 will receive a total hip replacement with the following components: CORAIL (impaction broach) titanium stem and a monoblock cup with ceramic on ceramic bearing (DELTA motion).
Patients that are randomized into Group 2 will receive a total hip replacement with the following components: the Trilock-Pinnacle system (titanium stem and titanium cup with polyethylene insert).
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patients who are undergoing primary hip surgery for osteo/degenerative arthritis (does not include traumatic arthritis, congenital hip dysplasia, or avascular necrosis).
- Patients who are skeletally mature, as determined by Risser sign or at least 18 years of age
- Patients under 75 years of age
- Patients for whom there is a reasonable expectation that they will be available for each examination scheduled over a two year post-operative follow-up period.
You may not qualify if:
- Patients with previous fusions, acute femoral neck fractures and above knee amputations.
- Patients with evidence of active local infection
- Patients with neurologic or musculoskeletal disease that may adversely affect gait or weight-bearing.
- Patients who have previously undergone an ipsilateral hemi resurfacing, total resurfacing, total bipolar, unipolar or total hip replacement device, or any prior hip surgery or retained internal fixation.
- Patients who are anticipated to require contralateral hip surgery in the next year
- Patients with known disorders of bone metabolism, systemic inflammatory disorders, and use of drug medications, including oral steroids, HRT, Tamoxifen, calcium, or vitamin D in the past year, and any past bisphosphonate therapy.
- Patients with a Body Mass Index (BMI) \> 35
- Patients with neuropathic joints
- Patients with severe documented psychiatric disease
- Patients requiring structural bone grafts
- Patients with an ipsilateral girdlestone
- Patients with sickle cell disease
- Patients with major acetabular bone stock deficiency
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Ottawa Hospital Research Institutelead
- Johnson & Johnsoncollaborator
Study Sites (1)
The Ottawa Hospital - General Campus
Ottawa, Ontario, K1H 8L6, Canada
Related Publications (2)
Slullitel PA, Mahatma MM, Farzi M, Grammatopoulos G, Wilkinson JM, Beaule PE. Influence of Femoral Component Design on Proximal Femoral Bone Mass After Total Hip Replacement: A Randomized Controlled Trial. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2021 Jan 6;103(1):74-83. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.20.00351.
PMID: 33079901RESULTFischman D, Mahatma MM, Slullitel P, Farzi M, Grammatopoulos G, Poitras S, Wilkinson JM, Beaule PE. Does a Monoblock Acetabular Component With a Ceramic Liner Cause More Pelvic Bone Loss Than a Conventional Modular Cementless Acetabular Component? A 2-Year Randomized Clinical Trial. J Arthroplasty. 2022 Jan;37(1):75-82. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2021.08.033. Epub 2021 Sep 4.
PMID: 34649747DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Interventions
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Dr Paul Beaule
- Organization
- The Ottawa Hospital Research Institute
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Paul E Beaulé, MD, FRCSC
Ottawa Hospital Research Institute
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restrictive Agreement
- No
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- CARE PROVIDER
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- FACTORIAL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 16, 2012
First Posted
March 20, 2012
Study Start
April 1, 2010
Primary Completion
July 31, 2019
Study Completion
November 20, 2020
Last Updated
December 19, 2020
Results First Posted
December 19, 2020
Record last verified: 2020-11
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share