Long-term of 10 Years Results of a Prospective Longitudinal Study
Usefulness of Home Blood Pressure Measurement in the Morning in Type 2 Diabetic Patients : Long-term (10 Years) Results of a Prospective Longitudinal Study
1 other identifier
observational
400
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Previous cross-sectional studies have demonstrated that blood pressure (BP) measurements at home (HBP) in the morning offer stronger predictive power for micro- and macrovascular complications in patients with type 1 and 2 diabetes than casual/clinic blood pressure measurements (CBP) (Kamoi K et al, 2002-2003). Further, a prospective, longitudinal study for 6 years in patients with type 2 diabetes also demonstrated that control of wakening-up HBP provides the stronger predictive power for the outcomes than that of CBP did (Kamoi et al, 2010). However, it is not clear to show which of BP measurement provides the stronger predictive power for outcomes by comparing cumulative events over a longer time than 6 years. Therefore, the investigators examined which of HBP or CBP provides the stronger predictive power for outcomes in addition of renal anemia reported previously over 10 years in the patients with type 2 diabetes.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for all trials
Started Nov 1999
Longer than P75 for all trials
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
November 1, 1999
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 8, 2012
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 20, 2012
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
February 1, 2013
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
March 1, 2013
CompletedMarch 20, 2012
March 1, 2012
13.3 years
March 8, 2012
March 16, 2012
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Death
Number of participats not alive
Average time is 10 years
Secondary Outcomes (2)
Microvascular complications including renal anemia
Average time is 10 years
Macrovascular complications
Average time is 10 years
Study Arms (2)
1. Morning HP and NT
Subjects based on HBP were divided into MH and MN patients
2. Clinic HP and NT
Subjects based on CBP were divided into CH and CN patients
Interventions
To clarify which of HBP or CBP provides the stronger prediction power for the outcomes.
Eligibility Criteria
400 patients
You may qualify if:
- After a detailed baseline examination, 400 Japanese subjects with type 2 diabetes reported previously are followed up for all-cause mortality and morbidity.
You may not qualify if:
- Other than the above, patients judged inappropriate as the subjects of this study by the investigator
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Nagaoka Red Cross Hospital
Nagaoka, Niigata, 940-2085, Japan
Related Publications (3)
Kamoi K, Miyakoshi M, Soda S, Kaneko S, Nakagawa O. Usefulness of home blood pressure measurement in the morning in type 2 diabetic patients. Diabetes Care. 2002 Dec;25(12):2218-23. doi: 10.2337/diacare.25.12.2218.
PMID: 12453964RESULTKamoi K, Imamura Y, Miyakoshi M, Kobayashi C. Usefulness of home blood pressure measurement in the morning in type 1 diabetic patients. Diabetes Care. 2003 Aug;26(8):2473-5. doi: 10.2337/diacare.26.8.2473. No abstract available.
PMID: 12882886RESULTKamoi K, Ito T, Miyakoshi M, Minagawa S. Usefulness of home blood pressure measurement in the morning in patients with type 2 diabetes: long-term results of a prospective longitudinal study. Clin Exp Hypertens. 2010 May;32(3):184-92. doi: 10.3109/10641960903254513.
PMID: 20504126RESULT
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Kyuzi Kamoi, MD
Nagaoka Red Cross Hospital
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- COHORT
- Time Perspective
- PROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Investigator
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 8, 2012
First Posted
March 20, 2012
Study Start
November 1, 1999
Primary Completion
February 1, 2013
Study Completion
March 1, 2013
Last Updated
March 20, 2012
Record last verified: 2012-03