NCT01554137

Brief Summary

Stroke (CVA) is the leading cause of death and the leading cause of disability in developed countries as in developing countries (WHO, 2000). In the aftermath of a stroke, patients keep a permanent disability in 75% of cases and only one quarter of them is able to resume work. The post stroke sequelae are sensory-motor and cognitive. According to literature data, 75-83% of patients who survive a stroke learn to walk only 25 to 45% recover use of their upper limb in activities of daily living (Friedman, 1990). The existence of a phase called "plateau" in motor recovery after stroke has been suggested (Colautti, 2001). This would occur beyond the 4 th month and would correspond to a phase where the rehabilitation techniques used in the subacute phase are deemed less effective. Recently, Page (2004) speculated that this plateau phase is rather the consequence of adaptation to the type of patient follow-up training and not that of a limit to the possibilities of recovery. In an observational study on the recovery of upper limb conducted over a period of 4 years, Broeks (2004) showed a possible recovery beyond 16 weeks post stroke. The results of studies on different techniques for rehabilitation of chronic stroke patients tend to confirm the hypothesis of page. Therefore, varying the training parameters (type, intensity, frequency) could improve the functional capabilities of these patients, even at a distance of stroke. Strength training is part of the management of hemiparetic patients. The results of several studies show an improvement in muscle strength and functional ability to walk after a building program isokinetic lower limb (Sharp, 1997). The objective of our project is to evaluate the effectiveness of a building program of isokinetic muscle on the paretic limb motor recovery in hemiparetic patients over 6 months of a stroke.

Trial Health

57
Monitor

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
20

participants targeted

Target at below P25 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Oct 2010

Longer than P75 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
terminated

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

October 1, 2010

Completed
1.4 years until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

March 12, 2012

Completed
2 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

March 14, 2012

Completed
3.6 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

October 1, 2015

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

October 1, 2015

Completed
Last Updated

June 1, 2016

Status Verified

May 1, 2016

Enrollment Period

5 years

First QC Date

March 12, 2012

Last Update Submit

May 31, 2016

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • upper limb motor function

    improving upper limb motor recovery at the end of the program is evaluated by the Fugl-Meyer test.This test evaluates motor impairment of the hemiplegic upper limb, balance, sensitivity, passive joint mobility and joint pain at mobilization.

    6 weeks

Study Arms (2)

With isokinetic strength training

EXPERIMENTAL

60 minutes isokinetic strength training on concentric mode

Other: isokinetic strength training

without isokinetic strength training

PLACEBO COMPARATOR

passive motion 60 minutes

Other: passive motion

Interventions

The experimental group will follow a program of 18 sessions (3 sessions per week for 6 weeks) with a physiotherapy treatment (30 minutes) and occupational therapy (30 minutes), and a building session isokinetic concentric mode extensor and flexor muscles of the elbow extensors and wrist flexors.

With isokinetic strength training

The control group will follow a program of 18 sessions of physiotherapy and occupational therapy combined with 18 sessions of passive motion in flexion-elbow extension, wrist flexion-extension on the isokinetic device

without isokinetic strength training

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Patients with more than 6 months post stroke,
  • Muscular control greater than or equal to 3 on the extensors and elbow flexors,
  • Muscular control greater than or equal to 3 on the flexors and extensors of the wrist,
  • Spasticity less than or equal to 3 on the muscle groups mentioned above, s
  • Active abduction of the shoulder above 60 ° and painless
  • Absence of cognitive impairment (MMS\> 22 without any trouble phasic)
  • No orthopedic limitations at the elbow and wrist,

You may not qualify if:

  • Progressive neurological or systemic involvement,
  • Orthopedic limitations at the elbow or wrist
  • Cognitive,
  • Hemineglect,
  • Severe aphasia with impaired comprehension,

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Service de médecine Physique et de Réadaptation

Montpellier, 34000, France

Location

Related Publications (1)

  • Coroian F, Jourdan C, Bakhti K, Palayer C, Jaussent A, Picot MC, Mottet D, Julia M, Bonnin HY, Laffont I. Upper Limb Isokinetic Strengthening Versus Passive Mobilization in Patients With Chronic Stroke: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2018 Feb;99(2):321-328. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2017.08.490. Epub 2017 Sep 22.

MeSH Terms

Interventions

Range of Motion, Articular

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Physical ExaminationDiagnostic Techniques and ProceduresDiagnosisMusculoskeletal Physiological PhenomenaMusculoskeletal and Neural Physiological Phenomena

Study Officials

  • Flavia COROIAN, MD

    UH Montpellier

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
DOUBLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

March 12, 2012

First Posted

March 14, 2012

Study Start

October 1, 2010

Primary Completion

October 1, 2015

Study Completion

October 1, 2015

Last Updated

June 1, 2016

Record last verified: 2016-05

Locations