Interests of Strengthening Isokinetic Upper Extremity Hemiparetic Sequelae in Patients
1 other identifier
interventional
20
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Stroke (CVA) is the leading cause of death and the leading cause of disability in developed countries as in developing countries (WHO, 2000). In the aftermath of a stroke, patients keep a permanent disability in 75% of cases and only one quarter of them is able to resume work. The post stroke sequelae are sensory-motor and cognitive. According to literature data, 75-83% of patients who survive a stroke learn to walk only 25 to 45% recover use of their upper limb in activities of daily living (Friedman, 1990). The existence of a phase called "plateau" in motor recovery after stroke has been suggested (Colautti, 2001). This would occur beyond the 4 th month and would correspond to a phase where the rehabilitation techniques used in the subacute phase are deemed less effective. Recently, Page (2004) speculated that this plateau phase is rather the consequence of adaptation to the type of patient follow-up training and not that of a limit to the possibilities of recovery. In an observational study on the recovery of upper limb conducted over a period of 4 years, Broeks (2004) showed a possible recovery beyond 16 weeks post stroke. The results of studies on different techniques for rehabilitation of chronic stroke patients tend to confirm the hypothesis of page. Therefore, varying the training parameters (type, intensity, frequency) could improve the functional capabilities of these patients, even at a distance of stroke. Strength training is part of the management of hemiparetic patients. The results of several studies show an improvement in muscle strength and functional ability to walk after a building program isokinetic lower limb (Sharp, 1997). The objective of our project is to evaluate the effectiveness of a building program of isokinetic muscle on the paretic limb motor recovery in hemiparetic patients over 6 months of a stroke.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Oct 2010
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
October 1, 2010
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 12, 2012
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 14, 2012
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
October 1, 2015
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
October 1, 2015
CompletedJune 1, 2016
May 1, 2016
5 years
March 12, 2012
May 31, 2016
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
upper limb motor function
improving upper limb motor recovery at the end of the program is evaluated by the Fugl-Meyer test.This test evaluates motor impairment of the hemiplegic upper limb, balance, sensitivity, passive joint mobility and joint pain at mobilization.
6 weeks
Study Arms (2)
With isokinetic strength training
EXPERIMENTAL60 minutes isokinetic strength training on concentric mode
without isokinetic strength training
PLACEBO COMPARATORpassive motion 60 minutes
Interventions
The experimental group will follow a program of 18 sessions (3 sessions per week for 6 weeks) with a physiotherapy treatment (30 minutes) and occupational therapy (30 minutes), and a building session isokinetic concentric mode extensor and flexor muscles of the elbow extensors and wrist flexors.
The control group will follow a program of 18 sessions of physiotherapy and occupational therapy combined with 18 sessions of passive motion in flexion-elbow extension, wrist flexion-extension on the isokinetic device
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patients with more than 6 months post stroke,
- Muscular control greater than or equal to 3 on the extensors and elbow flexors,
- Muscular control greater than or equal to 3 on the flexors and extensors of the wrist,
- Spasticity less than or equal to 3 on the muscle groups mentioned above, s
- Active abduction of the shoulder above 60 ° and painless
- Absence of cognitive impairment (MMS\> 22 without any trouble phasic)
- No orthopedic limitations at the elbow and wrist,
You may not qualify if:
- Progressive neurological or systemic involvement,
- Orthopedic limitations at the elbow or wrist
- Cognitive,
- Hemineglect,
- Severe aphasia with impaired comprehension,
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Service de médecine Physique et de Réadaptation
Montpellier, 34000, France
Related Publications (1)
Coroian F, Jourdan C, Bakhti K, Palayer C, Jaussent A, Picot MC, Mottet D, Julia M, Bonnin HY, Laffont I. Upper Limb Isokinetic Strengthening Versus Passive Mobilization in Patients With Chronic Stroke: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2018 Feb;99(2):321-328. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2017.08.490. Epub 2017 Sep 22.
PMID: 28947166DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Interventions
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Flavia COROIAN, MD
UH Montpellier
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 12, 2012
First Posted
March 14, 2012
Study Start
October 1, 2010
Primary Completion
October 1, 2015
Study Completion
October 1, 2015
Last Updated
June 1, 2016
Record last verified: 2016-05