Neuromuscular Control in Individuals Following ACL-Reconstruction
The Use of Visuomotor Therapy to Modulate Corticospinal Excitability in Patients Following ACL-Reconstruction
1 other identifier
interventional
10
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to investigate the neurophysiological contributors to muscle function following ACL Reconstruction and the influence of motor control biofeedback exercise on measures of muscle function. The research team hypothesizes that the application of motor biofeedback will increase cortical excitability of the quadriceps compared to the passive movement of the knee. This is a single session cross-over intervention study with a 1-week washout period between treatment arms.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Mar 2019
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
March 1, 2019
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
March 1, 2020
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
March 1, 2020
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
July 21, 2020
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
July 31, 2020
CompletedJuly 31, 2020
July 1, 2020
1 year
July 21, 2020
July 28, 2020
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (6)
Quadriceps Motor Evoked Potential (micoVolts) PreSham (Passive Motion)
Activation of the Quadriceps muscle through stimulation of primary motor cortex. Measured Through electromyography on the vastus medialis
6-months post-Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction
Quadriceps Motor Evoked Potential (micoVolts) PostSham (Passive Motion)
Activation of the Quadriceps muscle through stimulation of primary motor cortex. Measured Through electromyography on the vastus medialis
6-months post-Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction
Change in Quadriceps Motor Evoked Potential - Sham (Passive Motion)
Difference in microVolts between pre-sham measure and post-sham measure
6-months post-Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction
Quadriceps Motor Evoked Potential (micoVolts) PreActive (Visuomotor Therapy)
Activation of the Quadriceps muscle through stimulation of primary motor cortex. Measured Through electromyography on the vastus medialis
6-months post-Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction
Quadriceps Motor Evoked Potential (micoVolts) PostActive (Visuomotor Therapy)
Activation of the Quadriceps muscle through stimulation of primary motor cortex. Measured Through electromyography on the vastus medialis
6-months post-Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction
Change in Quadriceps Motor Evoked Potential - Active (Visuomotor Therapy)
Difference in microVolts between pre-active measure and post-active measure
6-months post-Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction
Study Arms (2)
Visuomotor Therapy
EXPERIMENTALPatients were seated in the isokinetic dynamometer with their hips flexed to 85º. A target sine wave with a maximum amplitude of 30% MVIC and a minimum amplitude of 5% MVIC and a frequency of 0.128 Hz was visually presented to the patient.31 The patient was instructed to match their torque to the presented target throughout the duration of testing. Each visuomotor therapy trial was 60-seconds, followed by 30-seconds of rest for 10 repetitions, totaling 15 minutes.
Passive Motion
ACTIVE COMPARATORPatients were seated in the isokinetic dynamometer with their hips flexed to 85º. The dynamometer then passively moved the patient from 80º to 120º of knee flexion for 60-seconds, followed by 30-seconds of rest for 10 repetitions, totaling 15 minutes. The patient was provided visual feedback of their knee position throughout the trials. The patient was instructed to relax their knee throughout the intervention.
Interventions
The use of visual feedback informing internal physiological processes, such as muscle activation, torque, and joint position, has been termed "visuomotor therapy". Visuomotor therapy encompasses completion of sub-maximal motor control tasks accompanying real-time visual biofeedback.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Ages 18-45
- At the time point of return to play progression following ACL Reconstruction
- Physically active individuals based on current ACSM guidelines of 30 minutes of moderate-intensity daily physical activity three days a week)
You may not qualify if:
- Subjects who are known to be pregnant (self-reported)
- Subjects diagnosed with malignancy
- Subjects with serious infection near the lower limb
- Subjects with known muscular abnormalities
- History of cardiopulmonary disorder
- Subjects with a previous history of stroke
- History of neurological or psychiatric disorders including poorly controlled migraine headaches, seizure disorder, history or immediate family history of seizures and/or epilepsy
- Subjects with any type of neuropathy (numbness and tingling)
- Subjects with a clinical diagnosis of multiple sclerosis (MS) or Parkinson's Disease
- Implanted biomedical device (active or inactive implants (including device leads), including deep brain stimulators, cochlear implants, and vagus nerve stimulators)
- History of skull fracture
- Subjects who have any metal implants anywhere in their head, neck or shoulders
- Patients taking any medications, which may influence cortical excitability, which could influence neurophysiologic measures) and affect objective clinical data (e.g. antispastics, anxiolytics, hypnotics, ant-epileptics)
- Subjects who are prescribed medications which may influence cortical excitability, which could influence neurophysiologic measures) and affect objective clinical data (e.g. antispastics, anxiolytics, hypnotics, ant-epileptics), will not be able to remain in the study.
- Unable to provide consent.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
University of Virginia
Charlottesville, Virginia, 22903, United States
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Joe M Hart, PhD
Associate Professor
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- Assessing investigator was blinded to the intervention that was received by the participant.
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- CROSSOVER
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Associate Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
July 21, 2020
First Posted
July 31, 2020
Study Start
March 1, 2019
Primary Completion
March 1, 2020
Study Completion
March 1, 2020
Last Updated
July 31, 2020
Record last verified: 2020-07
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share