Walnut Oral Immunotherapy for Tree Nut Allergy
WOIT
2 other identifiers
interventional
22
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to determine if walnut oral immunotherapy can be used in participants allergic to tree nuts to reduce tree nut allergy and induce changes in the participant's immune system.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for phase_1
Started Apr 2012
Longer than P75 for phase_1
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 1, 2012
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 7, 2012
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
April 27, 2012
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
July 2, 2015
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
July 2, 2020
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
May 12, 2023
CompletedMay 12, 2023
April 1, 2023
3.2 years
March 1, 2012
December 3, 2021
April 19, 2023
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Effectiveness of Walnut OIT on Clinical Desensitization to Test Tree Nut as Measured by Change in Cumulative Tolerated Dose From Baseline to Week 38 at Oral Food Challenge
Determine in tree nut allergic subjects the effectiveness of walnut oral immunotherapy on clinical desensitization to a second tree nut ("test tree nut") causing allergy when compared to placebo treatment, as measured by the change in cumulative dose from baseline oral food challenge (OFC) to the OFC to the test tree nut at approximately 38 weeks on therapy.
38 weeks of therapy
Secondary Outcomes (6)
Evaluation of Desensitization to Walnut Protein as Measured by Change in Cumulative Tolerated Dose From Baseline to Week 38 Oral Food Challenge
38 weeks
Number (Percentage) of Subjects Reaching a Cumulative Tolerated Dose of 2000mg Walnut Protein at Desensitization OFC at Week 38
38 weeks
Number (Percentage) of Subjects Reaching a Cumulative Tolerated Dose of 2000mg Test Tree Nut Protein at Desensitization OFC at Week 38
38 weeks
Number (Percentage) of Subjects Attaining Sustained Unresponsiveness to Walnut and Test Tree Nut Proteins at Week 298 Oral Food Challenge
up to 298 weeks on active treatment
Change in Skin Prick Test Wheal Size From Baseline to Week 142 in Active and Placebo Cross-over Subjects Receiving Active Walnut OIT
142 weeks
- +1 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (3)
Walnut Protein Powder
EXPERIMENTAL38 weeks on active walnut powder on blinded treatment phase
Oat Powder
PLACEBO COMPARATOR38 weeks on placebo (oat) powder during blinded treatment phase
Open-label Walnut Protein Powder
OTHEROpen-label treatment with walnut protein powder up to week 298 of total treatment
Interventions
Blinded study product dosing begins with a 1-day oral desensitization protocol to walnut for subjects in the active arm. Starting at 0.1 mg protein and increasing to a maximum of 6 mg or until allergic symptoms develop. Subjects continue daily dosing of blinded OIT (walnut) with build-up every 2 weeks to a maximum daily dose of 1500mg at week 34, followed by 4 weeks of daily maintenance dosing. OFC to walnut and second tree nut occurs at week 38 then treatment is unblinded and open-label maintenance dosing occurs.
Blinded study product dosing begins with a one-day oral desensitization protocol with placebo (oat) powder. Subjects in the placebo group will undergo the same protocol as those in the active group with placebo OIT dosing. Unblinding to treatment assignment will occur after the 38 week oral food challenge. Placebo subjects will cross-over to active, open-label treatment with walnut powder after the 38 week oral food challenge. beginning with initial escalation day, through build-up and maintenance dosing per the same protocol sequence as noted for active, walnut powder. Subjects will complete an oral food challenge to walnut and the second tree nut at week 38 then will continue on long-term, open-label maintenance dosing until the end of study using same protocol design.
Open-label treatment phase begins after the 38 week oral food challenge with unblinding of treatment assignment. For those on active treatment, daily maintenance dosing occurs for up to a total of 298 weeks. For those on placebo treatment, cross-over to active, open-label treatment occurs using the same active treatment protocol. Placebo-crossover subjects will complete an oral food challenge to walnut and the second tree nut at week 38 of active therapy then continue on long-term, open-label maintenance dosing until the end of study using same protocol design. All subjects may reach a qualifying IgE to walnut/second tree nut early and will undergo an OFCs on and 4 weeks off OIT. All subjects will have OFCs on and 4 weeks off OIT at week 142 and at week 298, unless both walnut/second tree nut OFCs are passed at previous OFC prompting addition of these foods into the diet.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Age 6 to 45 years, either sex, any race, any ethnicity with a convincing clinical history of walnut or another tree nut allergy and either a positive prick skin test (≥ 3mm) or serologic evidence of allergic sensitization (defined as specific IgE \> 0.35 kU/L) to walnut and at least one other tree nut.
- A positive 2000 mg oral food challenge at enrollment to walnut and to one other tree nut.
- Written informed consent from participant and/or parent/guardian
- Written assent from all subjects as appropriate
- All females of child bearing age must be using appropriate birth control
You may not qualify if:
- History of severe anaphylaxis to walnut or other tree nuts, defined as symptoms associated with hypoxia, hypotension or neurologic compromise (cyanosis or SpO2 \< 92% at any stage, hypotension, confusion, collapse, loss of consciousness; or incontinence).
- Known allergy to oat
- Chronic disease (other than asthma, atopic dermatitis, rhinitis) requiring therapy or other respiratory or medical conditions deemed by the investigator to put the subject at increased risk of anaphylaxis or poor outcomes from receiving OIT or undergoing food challenge.
- Poor control or persistent activation of atopic dermatitis
- Active eosinophilic or other inflammatory (e.g., celiac) gastrointestinal disease in the past 2 years.
- Participation in any interventional study for food allergy in the past 6 months
- Participant is on "build-up phase" of immunotherapy (i.e., has not reached maintenance dosing).
- Severe asthma (2007 NHLBI Criteria Steps 5 or 6, see Appendix 2) or poorly controlled mild or moderate asthma
- Inability to discontinue antihistamines for initial day escalation, skin testing or OFC
- Use of omalizumab or other non-traditional forms of allergen immunotherapy (e.g., oral or sublingual) or immunomodulator therapy (not including corticosteroids) or biologic therapy within the past year
- Use of beta-blockers (oral), angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors, angiotensin-receptor blockers (ARB) or calcium channel blockers
- Pregnancy or lactation
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Arkansas Children's Hospital
Little Rock, Arkansas, 72202, United States
Related Publications (4)
Jones SM, Pons L, Roberts JL, Scurlock AM, Perry TT, Kulis M, Shreffler WG, Steele P, Henry KA, Adair M, Francis JM, Durham S, Vickery BP, Zhong X, Burks AW. Clinical efficacy and immune regulation with peanut oral immunotherapy. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2009 Aug;124(2):292-300, 300.e1-97. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2009.05.022. Epub 2009 Jul 3.
PMID: 19577283BACKGROUNDHofmann AM, Scurlock AM, Jones SM, Palmer KP, Lokhnygina Y, Steele PH, Kamilaris J, Burks AW. Safety of a peanut oral immunotherapy protocol in children with peanut allergy. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2009 Aug;124(2):286-91, 291.e1-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2009.03.045. Epub 2009 May 27.
PMID: 19477496BACKGROUNDKulis M, Li Y, Lane H, Pons L, Burks W. Single-tree nut immunotherapy attenuates allergic reactions in mice with hypersensitivity to multiple tree nuts. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2011 Jan;127(1):81-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2010.09.014. Epub 2010 Nov 18.
PMID: 21093029BACKGROUNDVarshney P, Jones SM, Scurlock AM, Perry TT, Kemper A, Steele P, Hiegel A, Kamilaris J, Carlisle S, Yue X, Kulis M, Pons L, Vickery B, Burks AW. A randomized controlled study of peanut oral immunotherapy: clinical desensitization and modulation of the allergic response. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2011 Mar;127(3):654-60. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2010.12.1111.
PMID: 21377034BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Limitations and Caveats
Small sample size High screen failure rate High level of oropharyngeal symptoms Anxiety resulting in early termination Dosing fatigue with daily dosing Requirement for multiple food challenges in multi-tree nut assessment
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Dr. Stacie Jones
- Organization
- University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Stacie M Jones, MD
University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences / Arkansas Children's Hospital
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 1
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- QUADRUPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- CROSSOVER
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 1, 2012
First Posted
March 7, 2012
Study Start
April 27, 2012
Primary Completion
July 2, 2015
Study Completion
July 2, 2020
Last Updated
May 12, 2023
Results First Posted
May 12, 2023
Record last verified: 2023-04