NCT03532360

Brief Summary

this study evaluates whether tolerance to peanuts and tree nuts can be induced in patients through a process of oral immunotherapy. Participants will be randomized into groups receiving oral immunotherapy and a control group that will receive no intervention

Trial Health

75
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
51

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable

Timeline
20mo left

Started Feb 2018

Longer than P75 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

2 active sites

Status
active not recruiting

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Progress83%
Feb 2018Dec 2027

Study Start

First participant enrolled

February 19, 2018

Completed
25 days until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

March 16, 2018

Completed
2 months until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

May 22, 2018

Completed
6.1 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

June 26, 2024

Completed
3.5 years until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

December 31, 2027

Expected
Last Updated

February 6, 2025

Status Verified

February 1, 2025

Enrollment Period

6.4 years

First QC Date

March 16, 2018

Last Update Submit

February 4, 2025

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (2)

  • Efficacy of desensitization in peanut/tree nut allergic patients as measured by blinded, placebo controlled oral food challenge

    Comparison of participants randomized to treatments arms who achieve peanut/tree nut desensitization compared to participants randomized to the control groups. This is measured by whether a participant is able to tolerate a total dose of 4172 mg crushed peanut or tree nut during an oral food challenge

    21 months

  • Comparison of efficacy of 30 mg dose versus 300 mg dose in inducing desensitization to peanut or tree nut as measured by blinded, placebo controlled oral food challenge

    Participants in the 30 mg arm will be compared to those in the 300 mg in terms of dose tolerated at post-immunotherapy blinded, placebo-controlled oral food challenge, as well as side effects experienced during immunotherapy

    21 months

Secondary Outcomes (6)

  • Change from baseline over the immunotherapy process of peanut or tree nut (as appropriate) specigic IgE levels

    21 months

  • Change from baseline over the immunotherapy process of peanut or tree nut (as appropriate) specigic IgA levels

    21 months

  • Change from baseline over the immunotherapy process of peanut or tree nut (as appropriate) specigic IgG4 levels

    21 months

  • Change from baseline over the immunotherapy process of mast cell activation as measured by CD63 expression

    21 months

  • Change from baseline over the immunotherapy process of of DNA methylation levels

    21 months

  • +1 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (3)

Control

NO INTERVENTION

Following randomization, this arm will receive no intervention. After twelve months, participants in this group will undergo a singe-blind, placebo-controlled oral food challenge

Low-dose

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Following randomization, participants in this group will receive escalating doses of the appropriate allergen, up to a dose of 30 mg. Once they attain that dose, they will maintain it for six months. At the end of this maintenance period, they will undergo a singe-blind, placebo-controlled oral food challenge

Other: Oral immunotherapy

High-dose

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Following randomization, participants in this group will receive escalating doses of the appropriate allergen, up to a dose of 300 mg. Once they attain that dose, they will maintain it for six months. At the end of this maintenance period, they will undergo a singe-blind, placebo-controlled oral food challenge

Other: Oral immunotherapy

Interventions

Starting from a very low level and over a period of several months, participants receive escalating doses of the food to which they are allergic

High-doseLow-dose

Eligibility Criteria

Age2 Years - 40 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsChild (0-17), Adult (18-64)

You may qualify if:

  • A history suggestive of immediate allergy to peanut/tree nut . A convincing clinical history of an IgE mediated reaction to a specific food will be defined as a minimum of 2 mild signs/symptoms or 1 moderate or 1 severe sign/symptom that was likely IgE mediated and occurred within 120 minutes after ingestion or contact (or inhalation in the case of fish and shellfish). Reactions will be considered mild if they involve pruritus, urticaria, flushing, or rhinoconjunctivitis; moderate if they involve angioedema, throat tightness, gastrointestinal complaints, or breathing difficulties (other than wheeze); and severe if they involve wheeze, cyanosis, or circulatory collapse.(54-57)
  • The presence of at least one of the following confirmatory tests:
  • Positive SPT to peanut/tree nut or its proteins (weal diameter 3 mm larger than that of the normal saline control). The allergens used will be commercial extracts of peanut/tree nut (Omega Labs, Toronto, Ontario).
  • Detection of serum specific IgE (\>0.35 kU/L) to peanut/tree nut or any of its proteins, measured by fluorescence enzyme immunoassay (Phadia, CAP System, Uppsala, Sweden).
  • Positive oral challenge test to peanut/tree nut. Oral challenges will be performed with raw peanut/tree nut according to the recommendations of the position paper of the European Academy of Allergology and Clinical Immunology (58).
  • Informed consent form signed by the parents or legal guardian

You may not qualify if:

  • Patients who are unstable from a respiratory point of view ..
  • Patients who present with intercurrent disease at the time of starting desensitization.
  • Non-IgE-mediated or non-immunological adverse reactions to nuts.
  • Malignant or immunopathological diseases and/or severe primary or secondary immune deficiencies.
  • Patients receiving immunosuppressor therapy
  • Patients receiving β-blockers (including topical formulations).
  • Associated diseases contraindicating the use of epinephrine: cardiovascular disease or severe hypertension.
  • Patients diagnosed with eosinophilic gastrointestinal disorder .

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (2)

Hospital for Sick Children

Toronto, Ontario, M5G 1X8, Canada

Location

Montreal Children's Hospital

Montreal, Quebec, H4A 3J1, Canada

Location

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Peanut HypersensitivityNut Hypersensitivity

Interventions

Immunotherapy

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Nut and Peanut HypersensitivityFood HypersensitivityHypersensitivity, ImmediateHypersensitivityImmune System Diseases

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

ImmunomodulationBiological TherapyTherapeutics

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
SINGLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT
Masking Details
Participants will be randomized to one of three groups: a control group that will receive no treatment, a low-dose group and a high dose group. Participants in the latter two groups will be blinded as to what group they have been assigned
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Model Details: Randomized controlled trial
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Research Clinician

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

March 16, 2018

First Posted

May 22, 2018

Study Start

February 19, 2018

Primary Completion

June 26, 2024

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 31, 2027

Last Updated

February 6, 2025

Record last verified: 2025-02

Locations