NCT01543204

Brief Summary

This study will evaluate the efficacy of etanercept in patients with plaque psoriasis who have lost a satisfactory response to adalimumab.

Trial Health

60
Monitor

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
64

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for phase_4

Timeline
Completed

Started Feb 2012

Typical duration for phase_4

Geographic Reach
2 countries

47 active sites

Status
terminated

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

January 17, 2012

Completed
15 days until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

February 1, 2012

Completed
1 month until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

March 2, 2012

Completed
3.2 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

May 29, 2015

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

May 29, 2015

Completed
1.1 years until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

June 27, 2016

Completed
Last Updated

December 29, 2017

Status Verified

December 1, 2017

Enrollment Period

3.3 years

First QC Date

January 17, 2012

Results QC Date

May 18, 2016

Last Update Submit

December 5, 2017

Conditions

Keywords

plaque psoriasisetanerceptadalimumab

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (2)

  • Percentage of Participants With an sPGA Score of 0 (Clear) or 1 (Almost Clear) at Week 12

    The sPGA is a 6-point scale ranging from 0 (clear) to 5 (very severe) used to measure the severity of disease (induration, scaling, and erythema). A sPGA response is defined as a sPGA value of clear (score 0) or almost clear (score 1).

    Week 12

  • Percentage of Participants With an sPGA Score of 0 (Clear) or 1 (Almost Clear) at Week 12 by Anti-adalimumab Antibody Status

    The sPGA is a 6-point scale ranging from 0 (clear) to 5 (very severe) used to measure the severity of disease (induration, scaling, and erythema). A sPGA response is defined as a sPGA value of clear (score 0) or almost clear (score 1).

    Week 12

Secondary Outcomes (28)

  • Percentage of Participants With an sPGA Score of 0 (Clear) or 1 (Almost Clear) at All Other Visits

    Weeks 4, 8, 16, 20 and 24

  • Percentage of Participants With an sPGA Score of 0 (Clear) or 1 (Almost Clear) at All Other Visits by Anti-adalimumab Antibody Status

    Weeks 4, 8, 16, 20 and 24

  • Percentage of Participants With an sPGA Score of 0, 1 or 2 at Each Visit

    Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20 and 24

  • Percentage of Participants With an sPGA Score of 0, 1 or 2 by Anti-adalimumab Antibody Status at Each Visit

    Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20 and 24

  • Static Physician Global Assessment (sPGA) at Each Visit

    Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20 and 24

  • +23 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (1)

Etanercept 50 mg

EXPERIMENTAL

Participants received etanercept 50 mg, twice weekly (BIW), subcutaneously (SC) for 12 weeks followed by 50 mg, once weekly (QW), SC for an additional 12 weeks.

Drug: Etanercept

Interventions

Administered by subcutaneous injection

Also known as: Enbrel®
Etanercept 50 mg

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Moderate to severe plaque psoriasis
  • Loss of satisfactory response to adalimumab
  • Currently receiving or recently discontinued treatment with adalimumab

You may not qualify if:

  • Active skin conditions that would interfere with evaluations of the effect of investigational product on psoriasis
  • Serious medical conditions

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (47)

Research Site

Birmingham, Alabama, 35205, United States

Location

Research Site

Mobile, Alabama, 36609, United States

Location

Research Site

Phoenix, Arizona, 85044, United States

Location

Research Site

Bakersfield, California, 93309, United States

Location

Research Site

Encino, California, 91436, United States

Location

Research Site

Irvine, California, 92697, United States

Location

Research Site

Los Angeles, California, 90045, United States

Location

Research Site

Sacramento, California, 95816, United States

Location

Research Site

San Francisco, California, 94118, United States

Location

Research Site

San Ramon, California, 94583, United States

Location

Research Site

Santa Monica, California, 90404, United States

Location

Research Site

Denver, Colorado, 80220, United States

Location

Research Site

Farmington, Connecticut, 06030, United States

Location

Research Site

Jacksonville, Florida, 32204, United States

Location

Research Site

Miami, Florida, 33136, United States

Location

Research Site

St. Petersburg, Florida, 33708, United States

Location

Research Site

Tampa, Florida, 33607, United States

Location

Research Site

Tampa, Florida, 33609, United States

Location

Research Site

Atlanta, Georgia, 30342, United States

Location

Research Site

Macon, Georgia, 31217, United States

Location

Research Site

Skokie, Illinois, 60077, United States

Location

Research Site

New Albany, Indiana, 47150, United States

Location

Research Site

Plainfield, Indiana, 46168, United States

Location

Research Site

Louisville, Kentucky, 40202, United States

Location

Research Site

New Orleans, Louisiana, 70112, United States

Location

Research Site

Boston, Massachusetts, 02115, United States

Location

Research Site

St Louis, Missouri, 63117, United States

Location

Research Site

Omaha, Nebraska, 68144, United States

Location

Research Site

East Windsor, New Jersey, 08520, United States

Location

Research Site

Verona, New Jersey, 07044, United States

Location

Research Site

Rochester, New York, 14625, United States

Location

Research Site

Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, 15213, United States

Location

Research Site

Plymouth Meeting, Pennsylvania, 19462, United States

Location

Research Site

Johnston, Rhode Island, 02919, United States

Location

Research Site

Charleston, South Carolina, 29414, United States

Location

Research Site

Bartlett, Tennessee, 38134, United States

Location

Research Site

Knoxville, Tennessee, 37917, United States

Location

Research Site

Nashville, Tennessee, 37215, United States

Location

Research Site

Dallas, Texas, 75231, United States

Location

Research Site

Houston, Texas, 77004, United States

Location

Research Site

Norfolk, Virginia, 23507, United States

Location

Research Site

Walla Walla, Washington, 99362, United States

Location

Research Site

Winnipeg, Manitoba, R3C 0N2, Canada

Location

Research Site

Halifax, Nova Scotia, B3H 0A2, Canada

Location

Research Site

Markham, Ontario, L3P 1X2, Canada

Location

Research Site

Peterborough, Ontario, K9J 1Z2, Canada

Location

Research Site

Waterloo, Ontario, N2J 1C4, Canada

Location

Related Publications (1)

  • Bagel J, Tyring S, Rice KC, Collier DH, Kricorian G, Chung J, Iles J, Stolshek BS, Kaliyaperumal A, Papp KA. Open-label study of etanercept treatment in patients with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis who lost a satisfactory response to adalimumab. Br J Dermatol. 2017 Aug;177(2):411-418. doi: 10.1111/bjd.15381. Epub 2017 Jul 19.

    PMID: 28196270BACKGROUND

Related Links

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Psoriasis

Interventions

Etanercept

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Skin Diseases, PapulosquamousSkin DiseasesSkin and Connective Tissue Diseases

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Immunoglobulin Fc FragmentsImmunoglobulin FragmentsPeptide FragmentsPeptidesAmino Acids, Peptides, and ProteinsImmunoglobulin Constant RegionsImmunoglobulinsImmunoproteinsBlood ProteinsProteinsSerum GlobulinsGlobulinsReceptors, Tumor Necrosis FactorReceptors, CytokineReceptors, ImmunologicReceptors, Cell SurfaceMembrane Proteins

Results Point of Contact

Title
Study Director
Organization
Amgen Inc.

Study Officials

  • MD

    Amgen

    STUDY DIRECTOR

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
No
Restriction Type
OTHER
Restrictive Agreement
Yes

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 4
Allocation
NA
Masking
NONE
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
SINGLE GROUP
Sponsor Type
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

January 17, 2012

First Posted

March 2, 2012

Study Start

February 1, 2012

Primary Completion

May 29, 2015

Study Completion

May 29, 2015

Last Updated

December 29, 2017

Results First Posted

June 27, 2016

Record last verified: 2017-12

Locations