Physician Modified Endovascular Grafts
PMEG
1 other identifier
interventional
500
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The primary objectives of this study are to determine whether physician modified endovascular grafts (PMEG) and specified company manufactured investigational devices are a safe and effective method of treating patients with elective, symptomatic or ruptured juxtarenal aortic aneurysms in those patients considered to have limited or no other options for treatment. Secondary objectives include the validation of a patient-specific, 3-D printed aortic template as a surgical planning tool for fenestrated endografting.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Mar 2011
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
March 1, 2011
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
February 18, 2012
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
February 23, 2012
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
January 1, 2045
ExpectedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
January 1, 2055
January 12, 2026
January 1, 2026
33.9 years
February 18, 2012
January 8, 2026
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (4)
Primary Safety Endpoints
The safety of physician modified endovascular grafts will be determined by evaluating the proportion of patients that experience a rate of Major Adverse Events.
Index Procedure through 12 Months
Primary Effectiveness Endpoint
The primary effectiveness endpoint is the proportion of treatment group subjects that achieve technical and treatment success.
Index Procedure through 12 Months
Primary Technical Success Endpoint
Successful delivery and deployment of the investigational device with preservation of those branch vessels intended to be preserved at the study Index Procedure.
Index Procedure
Primary Treatment Success Endpoint
All the following composite endpoint criteria to be met in order for a patient to be considered a treatment success: Technical Success, Freedom from Type I \& III endoleak, Freedom from stent graft migration \>10mm, Freedom from AAA enlargement \>5mm, Freedom from AAA rupture, Freedom from surgical conversion to open repair
Index Procedure through 12 Months
Secondary Outcomes (3)
Secondary Safety Endpoint
Index Procedure, 12 months, End of Study, Lifespan
Secondary Stent Graft Effectiveness Endpoint
Index Procedure through Lifespan
Secondary Clinical Utility Assessment Endpoint(s)
Index Procedure
Study Arms (1)
PMEG Fenestrated Graft or Company Manufactured Terumo Aortic Fenestrated TREO Graft
EXPERIMENTALSee Interventions for more details. Participants who sign the informed consent form and exit the study at any timepoint will be followed via chart review for their lifespan.
Interventions
PMEG Fenestrated Device- Physician modified fenestrations for the bilateral renal arteries, celiac and SMA. May include several fenestrations or only one with or without the use of the Terumo Aortic TREOFit 3-D Printed Template for fenestration placement. Company Manufactured Device - Terumo Aortic Fenestrated TREO Abdominal Stent Graft System fenestrated for the bilateral renal arteries, celiac and SMA. May be in the straight or tapered configurations based on patient anatomical needs.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patient is \> 18 years of age
- Patients who are male or non-pregnant female (females of child bearing potential must have a negative pregnancy test prior to enrollment into the study)
- Patient or Legally Authorized Representative has signed an Institutional Review Board (IRB) approved Informed Consent Form
- Patient has a juxtarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm that meets at least one of the following: Abdominal aortic aneurysm \>5.5 cm in diameter, Aneurysm has increased in size by 0.5 cm in last 6 months, Maximum diameter of aneurysm exceeds 1.5 times the transverse dimension of an adjacent non-aneurysmal aortic segment
- Patient has appropriate iliac/femoral artery anatomy for access, with or without the use of a conduit, that will allow endovascular access with the physician modified endovascular graft.
- Patient has a suitable non-aneurysmal proximal aortic neck length of \> 2 mm inferior to the most distal renal artery ostium.
- Patient has a suitable non-aneurysmal distal iliac artery length (seal zone) of \>15 mm. The resultant repair should preserve patency in at least one hypogastric artery.
- Patient has a suitable non-aneurysmal proximal aortic neck diameter between 20 and 32mm, averaged across the diameters at the Celiac, SMA, at the lowest patent renal artery and at the midpoint of the renal arteries.
- Patient has suitable non-aneurysmal distal common iliac diameters between 8 and 20 mm.
- Patient has juxtarenal aortic neck angulation \< 60º
- Patient must be willing to comply with all required follow-up exams
You may not qualify if:
- Patients that meet ANY of the following are not eligible for enrollment into the study:
- Patient has a mycotic aneurysm or has an active systemic infection
- Patient has unstable angina (defined as angina with a progressive increase in symptoms, new onset at rest or nocturnal angina, or onset of prolonged angina)
- Patient has a major surgical or interventional procedure planned within +/- 30 days of the AAA repair.
- Patient has history of connective tissue disease (e.g., Marfan's or Ehler's-Danlos syndrome).
- Patient has a known hypersensitivity or contraindication to anticoagulation or contrast media that is not amenable to pre-treatment.
- Patient has a known allergy or intolerance stainless steel or gold
- Patient has a body habitus that would inhibit X-ray visualization of the aorta
- Patient has a limited life expectancy of less than 1 year
- Patient is currently participating in another investigational device or drug clinical trial
- Patient has other medical, social or psychological conditions that, in the opinion of the investigator, preclude them from receiving the pre-treatment, required treatment, and post-treatment procedures and evaluations.
- Subject is eligible for enrollment in a manufacturer-sponsored IDE at the investigational site
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Harborview Medical Center
Seattle, Washington, 98104, United States
Related Publications (6)
Saldana-Ruiz N, Tachida A, Mossman A, Cure R, Larimore A, Dansey K, Starnes BW, Zettervall SL. Iliac tortuosity increases reinterventions but not adverse outcomes following repair of juxtarenal aneurysms using physician-modified endografts. J Vasc Surg. 2024 Mar;79(3):497-505. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2023.10.053. Epub 2023 Nov 3.
PMID: 37923024DERIVEDTachida A, Stafforini N, Singh N, Starnes B, Zettervall SL. Reinterventions after physician-modified endovascular grafts for treatment of juxtarenal aortic aneurysms are non-detrimental to long-term survival. J Vasc Surg. 2023 May;77(5):1367-1374.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2022.12.061. Epub 2023 Jan 7.
PMID: 36626956DERIVEDZettervall SL, Dansey K, Kline B, Singh N, Starnes BW. Significant aortic neck dilation occurs after repair of juxtarenal aneurysms with fenestrated endovascular aneurysm repair. J Vasc Surg. 2021 Oct;74(4):1090-1097.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2021.03.060. Epub 2021 Apr 28.
PMID: 33930518DERIVEDHemingway JF, Starnes BW, Kline BR, Singh N. Initial experience with the Terumo aortic Treo device for fenestrated endovascular aneurysm repair. J Vasc Surg. 2021 Sep;74(3):823-831.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2021.01.042. Epub 2021 Feb 14.
PMID: 33592291DERIVEDHurd JR, Chen X, Caps MT, Katsman D, Singh N, Zierler RE, Tatum B, Starnes BW. A reliable method for renal volume measurement and its application in fenestrated endovascular aneurysm repair. J Vasc Surg. 2020 May;71(5):1515-1520. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2019.07.089. Epub 2019 Oct 18.
PMID: 31635961DERIVEDStarnes BW, Tatum B. Early report from an investigator-initiated investigational device exemption clinical trial on physician-modified endovascular grafts. J Vasc Surg. 2013 Aug;58(2):311-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2013.01.029. Epub 2013 May 3.
PMID: 23643560DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Benjamin W Starnes, MD
University of Washington
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Professor, School of Medicine: Surgery
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
February 18, 2012
First Posted
February 23, 2012
Study Start
March 1, 2011
Primary Completion (Estimated)
January 1, 2045
Study Completion (Estimated)
January 1, 2055
Last Updated
January 12, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-01