NCT01534065

Brief Summary

The purpose of this multi-center post marketing surveillance study is to monitor the safety and performance of the Barricaid® ARD when used to surgically reconstruct the anulus of the L1 - S1 spinal disc.

Trial Health

100
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
45

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Apr 2009

Longer than P75 for not_applicable

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

April 1, 2009

Completed
2.8 years until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

January 4, 2012

Completed
1 month until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

February 16, 2012

Completed
1 year until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

March 1, 2013

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

March 1, 2013

Completed
Last Updated

April 8, 2022

Status Verified

March 1, 2022

Enrollment Period

3.9 years

First QC Date

January 4, 2012

Last Update Submit

March 30, 2022

Conditions

Keywords

HerniaIntervertebral Disk DisplacementPathological Conditions, AnatomicalSpinal DiseasesBone DiseasesMusculoskeletal Diseases

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (6)

  • Patient function as measured on Oswestry Disability Index (ODI)

    15-point reduction in ODI at 24-month visit relative to baseline

    24 months

  • Disc height maintenance as measured from standing x-rays

    75% maintenance at 2 years relative to pre-op, measured by independent radiologist, (reference: Yorimitsu, et al, Spine 2001)

    24 months

  • Clinically symptomatic recurrent herniation at the index level, confirmed by imaging

    Performed at 24 months by the Investigator.

    24 months

  • Migration of the bone anchor posteriorly into the epidural space

    Radiographic imaging taken to ensure no migration of the device. Assessment made by the Investigator and Radiographic Core lab.

    24 months

  • Removal or revision of the implant

    Any removal or revision of the implant will be measured as a safety outcome.

    24 months

  • Supplemental fixation applied at the treated level

    Any supplemental fixation applied at the treated level will be tracked.

    24 months

Secondary Outcomes (5)

  • Back Pain on Visual Analog Scale (VAS)

    24 months

  • Leg Pain on Visual Analog Scale (VAS)

    24 months

  • Quality of life on SF36

    24 months

  • Comparison of neurological symptoms on clinical examination, relative to baseline

    24 months

  • Frequency of AE's

    24 months

Study Arms (1)

Barricaid

EXPERIMENTAL

CE Marked Device

Device: Barricaid

Interventions

BarricaidDEVICE

Implanted intra-operatively during discectomy

Barricaid

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 75 Years
Sexmale
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Age 18 to 75 years old (male or female).
  • Patients with posterior or posterolateral disc herniations at one or two levels between L1 and S1 with radiographic confirmation of neural compression using CT and/or MRI.
  • At least six (6) weeks of failed, conservative treatment prior to surgery, including physical therapy, use of anti-inflammatory medications at maximum specified dosage and/or administration of epidural/facet injections.;
  • Minimum posterior disc height of 3mm at the index level(s).
  • Lower back pain and/or sciatica with or without spinal claudication.
  • Oswestry Questionnaire score of at least 40/100 at baseline.
  • VAS leg pain of at least 40/100 at baseline.

You may not qualify if:

  • Spondylolisthesis Grade II or higher
  • Subject requires uni or bilateral facetectomy to treat leg/back pain
  • Subject has back or non-radicular leg pain of unknown etiology.
  • Prior fusion (with or without instrumentation), motion preservation, facetectomy or IDET surgery at the index lumbar vertebral level
  • Subject's requiring a spine DEXA (i.e., patients with SCORE of ≥ 6) with a T Score less than -2.0 at the index level.
  • Subject has clinically compromised vertebral bodies at the index level(s) due to any traumatic, neoplastic, metabolic, or infectious pathology.
  • Subject has sustained pathologic fractures of the vertebra or multiple fractures of the vertebra or hip.
  • Subject has scoliosis of greater than ten (10) degrees (both angular and rotational).
  • Any metabolic disease bone disease that has not been stabilized for at least three months (e.g., Paget's disease, osteomalacia, osteogenesis imperfecta, thyroid and/or parathyroid gland disorder, etc.).
  • Subject has an active infection either systemic or local.
  • Subject has cauda equine syndrome or neurogenic bowel/bladder dysfunction.
  • Subject has severe arterial insufficiency of the legs (Screening on physical examination= patients with diminution or absence of dorsalis pedis or posterior tibialis pulses. If diminished or absent by palpation, then an arterial ultrasound is required with vascular plethysmography. If the absolute arterial pressure is below 50mm of Hg at the calf or ankle level, then the patient is to be excluded) or other peripheral vascular disease).
  • Subject has significant peripheral neuropathy, patient defined as a patient with Type I or Type II diabetes or similar systemic metabolic condition causing decreased sensation in a stocking-like or non-radicular and non-dermatomal distribution in the lower extremities.
  • Subject has insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus.
  • Subject is morbidly obese (defined as a body mass index \>40, or weighs more than 100 lbs over ideal body weight).
  • +10 more criteria

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Related Publications (2)

  • Lequin MB, Barth M, Thome C, Bouma GJ. Primary limited lumbar discectomy with an annulus closure device: one-year clinical and radiographic results from a prospective, multi-center study. Korean J Spine. 2012 Dec;9(4):340-7. doi: 10.14245/kjs.2012.9.4.340. Epub 2012 Dec 31.

  • Bouma GJ, Barth M, Ledic D, Vilendecic M. The high-risk discectomy patient: prevention of reherniation in patients with large anular defects using an anular closure device. Eur Spine J. 2013 May;22(5):1030-6. doi: 10.1007/s00586-013-2656-1. Epub 2013 Feb 3.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Intervertebral Disc DisplacementHerniaPathological Conditions, AnatomicalSpinal DiseasesBone DiseasesMusculoskeletal Diseases

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Pathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms

Study Officials

  • Claudius Thome, PhD

    University of Innsbruck, Department of Neurosurgery

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
NA
Masking
NONE
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
SINGLE GROUP
Sponsor Type
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

January 4, 2012

First Posted

February 16, 2012

Study Start

April 1, 2009

Primary Completion

March 1, 2013

Study Completion

March 1, 2013

Last Updated

April 8, 2022

Record last verified: 2022-03