Prospective Comparison of Primary Abdominal Closure and Vacuum Assisted Laparostomy in Treatment of Severe Peritonitis
Phase 4 Study of Primary Use of the Vacuum Assisted Laparostomy in Treatment of Severe Peritonitis
1 other identifier
interventional
57
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The aim of the project was to optimalize the process in severe peritonitis which is generally inflicted with high mortality and morbidity with long term costly therapy. Therapy of severe intraabdominal infection consist of treatment of the infection site and following closure of the abdominal cavity with possibility of re-laparotomy and in treatment of complications when needed; or closure introduction of laparostomy with intention to control complications prevention however with risk of tertiary peritonitis. Modern process is laparostomy with active suction (VAC) method which reduces the risk of tertiary peritonitis. It efficacy is however approved especially in therapy of complications. Based on the investigators experiences the investigators use this method even in case of primary treatment of severe peritonitis which led to protocol processing (VAC in case of primary closure of the abdominal cavity; VAC exchange according to scoring system; secondary closure of the abdominal cavity or early coverage with collagen mesh). The aim of this project is to prove reduced mortality, morbidity and hospitalization length (cost reduction) in prospective randomized study in patients treated due to severe peritonitis using VAC method in comparison to classical approach (primary closure of the abdominal cavity; secondary solution of complications).
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for phase_4
Started Jul 2008
Longer than P75 for phase_4
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
July 1, 2008
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
September 1, 2011
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 1, 2011
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
February 7, 2012
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
February 13, 2012
CompletedFebruary 13, 2012
February 1, 2012
3.2 years
February 7, 2012
February 10, 2012
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Mortality
The proportion of survivors and died patients
60 days after surgery
Secondary Outcomes (2)
Surgical Site Infection rate
30 days after surgery
Length of stay
duration of hospital stay, an expected average of 3 weeks
Study Arms (2)
VAC-laparostomy
EXPERIMENTALPrimary use of Vacuum Assisted Closure (VAC) laparostomy after surgical revision because of severe peritonitis
Primary abdominal closure
NO INTERVENTIONThe abdominal wall is primary closed after the surgical revision because of severe peritonitis
Interventions
Primary Vacuum Assisted Closure (V.A.C.)laparostomy was indicated after surgery in patients with severe peritonitis. VAC laparostomy was performed using sandwich technique (semi-permeable foil - intraabdominal foam - dynamic sutura of the fascia - foam inserted subcutaneously - non-permeable foil) and connected to the active suction of 125mmHg.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- patients indicated for urgent surgery for suspected acute abdomen with severe peritonitis (meet SIRS criteria or signs of diffuse peritoneal irritation)
- the diagnose of severe peritonitis is confirmed intraoperatively (Mannheim Peritonitis Index - MPI \> 25)
You may not qualify if:
- patients aged \< 18 and \> 80 years
- patients with not expected survival longer than 48 hours after surgery
- patients with different peroperative finding
- primary abdominal closure is not technically possible
- pregnant or nursing women
- patient does not agree to participate in the study, self-payers
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Faculty Hospital Bulovka
Prague, 18081, Czechia
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Ondrej Ryska, MD
Department of surgical, Faculty Hospital Bulovka, Prague, Czech Republic
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 4
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Head of ICU - Department of Surgery, Principal Investigator
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
February 7, 2012
First Posted
February 13, 2012
Study Start
July 1, 2008
Primary Completion
September 1, 2011
Study Completion
December 1, 2011
Last Updated
February 13, 2012
Record last verified: 2012-02