Evaluation of Multiscore Feedback in Professionalism for Anesthesia
1 other identifier
interventional
28
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Professionalism is one of the six competences required by The Accreditation for Graduate Medical Education Outcome Project to be taught and evaluated during residency. Anesthesia residents are faced with unique communication challenges in their practice including brief contact time with their patients, operating room efficiency pressure, etc. To assess professionalism in Anesthesiology residents is important to obtain evaluations from people with whom they interact including patients, surgeons, colleagues and members of the support team. The Multisource feedback (MSF) approach has been used to evaluate communication skills and professionalism among practicing physicians and residents in a variety of settings. This evaluation model has never been used previously to evaluate anesthesia residents. The investigators propose a randomized controlled trial to validate and evaluate a MSF in professionalism for anesthesia residents. Participants include eighty residents doing two months rotation in Pediatric Anesthesia Department at The Cleveland Clinic Anesthesia Institute from July 1, 2011 and June 30, 2013. MSF questionnaires will be validated using face and content validity methods and comparing them with the current system of evaluation. Residents will be randomly assigned to a feedback group or to the control group. Both groups will receive MSF evaluation from the faculty, patients' parent and coworker. Only the group assigned to feedback is going to have a 'coaching meeting' every month to identify strengths and weaknesses and create strategies for improvement. The investigators are planning to compare the mean values of the baseline evaluations with the mean values obtained after the first and second months from the MSF.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Jul 2011
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
July 1, 2011
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
January 27, 2012
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
January 31, 2012
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 1, 2017
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 1, 2017
CompletedFebruary 9, 2018
August 1, 2017
6.4 years
January 27, 2012
February 7, 2018
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Validate Multiscore Feedback (MSF)
To evaluate content validity, copies of the questionnaires will be sent to experts in education in the Anesthesia Institute and Graduate Medical Education at The Cleveland Clinic; they will be asked if the new questionnaires are a good tool to measure professionalism for anesthesia residents
up to 60 days
Secondary Outcomes (1)
secondary goal is to test a Multiscore Feedback (MSF) as a method of evaluation in professionalism for anesthesia residents.
up to 18 months
Study Arms (2)
Control Group
PLACEBO COMPARATORResidents will be randomly assigned to a feedback group or to the control group. Besides the standard evaluation at the end of the rotation, in both groups, residents will receive every week a MSF evaluation from the faculty, the patients' parent, and the coworker. Also, for every resident a baseline self assessment will be applied at the beginning and at the end of the rotation. Only the group assigned to feedback is going to have a 'coaching meeting' every month with the Chairman of Department of Pediatric Anesthesia to identify strengths and weaknesses and create strategies for improvement, based on the MSF.
Feedback group
ACTIVE COMPARATORResidents will be randomly assigned to a feedback group or to the control group. Besides the standard evaluation at the end of the rotation, in both groups, residents will receive every week a MSF evaluation from the faculty, the patients' parent, and the coworker. Also, for every resident a baseline self assessment will be applied at the beginning and at the end of the rotation. Only the group assigned to feedback is going to have a 'coaching meeting' every month with the Chairman of Department of Pediatric Anesthesia to identify strengths and weaknesses and create strategies for improvement, based on the MSF.
Interventions
Besides the standard evaluation at the end of the rotation, in both groups, residents will receive every week a Multiscore Feedback (MSF) evaluation from the faculty, the patients' parent, and the coworker. Also, for every resident a baseline self assessment will be applied at the beginning and at the end of the rotation. This group is going to have a 'coaching meeting' every month with the Chairman of Department of Pediatric Anesthesia to identify strengths and weaknesses and create strategies for improvement, based on the Multiscore Feedback (MSF).
Besides the standard evaluation at the end of the rotation, in both groups, residents will receive every week a Multiscore Feedback (MSF) evaluation from the faculty, the patients' parent, and the coworker. Also, for every resident a baseline self assessment will be applied at the beginning and at the end of the rotation.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- CA2 and CA3 residents doing a two month rotation in Pediatric Anesthesia Department
You may not qualify if:
- N/A
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Cleveland Clinic Foundation
Cleveland, Ohio, 44195, United States
MeSH Terms
Interventions
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Nelson Riveros, M.D.
The Cleveland Clinic
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- OTHER
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
January 27, 2012
First Posted
January 31, 2012
Study Start
July 1, 2011
Primary Completion
December 1, 2017
Study Completion
December 1, 2017
Last Updated
February 9, 2018
Record last verified: 2017-08