Comparison Between Three Types of Stented Pericardial Aortic Valves
Comparison of Short and Mid-term Hemodynamic Performance Between Three Types of Stented Pericardial Aortic Valves
1 other identifier
interventional
165
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This study suggests for the first time a comparison of the hemodynamic performance of the two most implanted aortic bioprosthesis in France with the new aortic bioprosthesis available since September 2010 at the University Hospital of Clermont Ferrand.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Mar 2012
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
December 20, 2011
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
January 31, 2012
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
March 1, 2012
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 1, 2013
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 1, 2013
CompletedSeptember 4, 2013
September 1, 2013
1.8 years
December 20, 2011
September 2, 2013
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
measurement of postoperative trans-valvular mean gradient by echocardiography
after 6 months
Secondary Outcomes (5)
Comparison between aortic annulus diameter measurement by preoperative CT angiography, transthoracic echocardiography and the aortic annulus' surgical size
at six months
Comparison between the aortic annulus measurement and the implanted bioprosthesis size
at six months
Surgical outcome at hospital
at 6 months.
Postoperative trans-valvular mean gradient by echocardiography
at six months.
Comparison of the transthoracic echocardiography estimated postoperative aortic surfaces
at six months.
Study Arms (1)
pericardial aortic valves
EXPERIMENTALComparison of short and mid-term hemodynamic performance between three types of stented pericardial aortic valves: Trifecta aortic valve (St. Jude Medical), Mitroflow aortic valve (Sorin Group), Magna Ease (Edwards Lifesciences)
Interventions
Comparison of short and mid-term hemodynamic performance between three types of stented pericardial aortic valves: Trifecta aortic valve (St. Jude Medical), Mitroflow aortic valve (Sorin Group), Magna Ease (Edwards Lifesciences)
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patients aged between 18 and 85 years who need aortic valve replacement (no endocarditis) With Bioprosthesis, with or without myocardial revascularization, with or without tricuspid valve repair surgery
You may not qualify if:
- no endocarditis
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- University Hospital, Clermont-Ferrandlead
- Edwards Lifesciencescollaborator
- Abbott Medical Devicescollaborator
- Sorin group, Italycollaborator
- Ministry of Health, Francecollaborator
Study Sites (1)
CHU Clermont-Ferrand
Clermont-Ferrand, 63003, France
Related Publications (1)
Azarnoush K, Pereira B, Duale C, Dorigo E, Farhat M, Innorta A, Dauphin N, Geoffroy E, Chabrot P, Camilleri L. Comparison between three types of stented pericardial aortic valves (Trivalve trial): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials. 2013 Dec 3;14:413. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-14-413.
PMID: 24299218DERIVED
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Kasra AZARNOUSH, MD, PhD
University Hospital, Clermont-Ferrand
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Masking
- NONE
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
December 20, 2011
First Posted
January 31, 2012
Study Start
March 1, 2012
Primary Completion
December 1, 2013
Study Completion
December 1, 2013
Last Updated
September 4, 2013
Record last verified: 2013-09