Study Stopped
5 years follow up completed in October 2018, long-term follow up terminated because of low data return
Safety and Effectiveness Study of Perceval S Valve for Extended CE Mark
CAVALIER
Perceval S Valve Clinical Trial for Extended CE Mark
1 other identifier
interventional
658
8 countries
26
Brief Summary
The primary objective of this clinical investigation is to assess the safety and effectiveness of the Perceval S valve at 12 months after implantation when used to replace a diseased or dysfunctional aortic valve or aortic valve prosthesis.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Feb 2010
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
26 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
February 23, 2010
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
June 7, 2011
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
June 8, 2011
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
October 31, 2014
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
January 31, 2020
CompletedMarch 6, 2024
March 1, 2024
4.7 years
June 7, 2011
March 5, 2024
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (8)
Evaluation of the safety: incidence of mortality
Incidence of mortality
12 months after OP
Evaluation of the safety: Incidence of morbidity
Incidence of morbidity Mortality and morbidity, adverse event categories: valvular thrombosis, thromboembolism, hemorrhage, paravalvular leak, endocarditis, hemolysis, SVD, non structural dysfunction, reoperation, explant, death, device dislodgement and device migration
12 months after OP
Evaluation of NYHA functional class
Change of NYHA functional class
12 months after OP
Evaluation of haemodynamic performance: mean and peak gradients
Change of aortic mean gradient and peak gradient (mmHg)
12 months after OP
Evaluation of haemodynamic performance: Effective Orifice Area (EOA) and Effective Orifice Area indexed (EOAI)
Change of EOA (cm2) and EOAI (cm2/m2) PI, cardiac output, cardiac index and degree of regurgitation
12 months after OP
Evaluation of haemodynamic performance: Cardiac Index
Change of Cardiac Index (l/min/m2)
12 months after OP
Evaluation of haemodynamic performance: Cardiac Output
Change of Cardiac Output (l/min)
12 months after OP
Evaluation of haemodynamic performance: incidence and degree of regurgitation
Change of incidence (%) and degree of regurgitation (none, trace, mild, moderate, severe)
12 months after OP
Secondary Outcomes (8)
Evaluation of the safety: incidence of mortality
3-6 months
Evaluation of the safety: Incidence of morbidity
3-6 months
Evaluation of NYHA functional class
3-6 months
Evaluation of haemodynamic performance
3-6 months
Evaluation of the safety: Incidence of mortality
up to 10 years
- +3 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (1)
Perceval S Valve Prosthesis
EXPERIMENTALPatients who underwent replacement of diseased or malfunctioning native aortic valve with the Perceval S Valve prosthesis
Interventions
Replacement of diseased or malfunctioning native aortic valve with the Perceval S valve prosthesis
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Subjects of age \> 65 years;
- Subjects with aortic valve stenosis or steno-insufficiency;
- Subjects in which preoperative evaluation indicated the need for native or prosthetic aortic valve replacement with a biological prosthesis;
- Subjects willing to sign the informed consent;
- Subjects willing to undergo all medical follow-up, echocardiography examinations and laboratory tests planned for the Study
You may not qualify if:
- Subjects involved in any other clinical study for drugs or devices;
- Subjects with a previously implanted Perceval S prosthesis, within the clinical study, that requires replacement
- Subjects with previous implantation of valve prostheses or annuloplasty ring not being replaced by the study valve
- Subjects requiring simultaneous cardiac procedures, apart from septal myectomy and/or coronary by-pass
- Subjects who require double or multiple valve replacement or repair in whom the mitral, tricuspid, or pulmonic valve would be replaced with a non-Perceval S valve or repaired
- Subjects with aneurysmal dilation or dissection of the ascending aortic wall
- Subjects needing non elective intervention
- Subjects with active endocarditis
- Subjects with active myocarditis
- Subjects with congenital bicuspid aortic valve
- Subjects with aortic root enlargement, where the ratio between the diameter of the sino-tubular junction and the annulus diameter, assessed by TTE, is \> 1.3 (see Attachment 1 for reference)
- Subjects with aortic root height (measured from aortic annulus to sino-tubular junction) ≥ 21 mm for size 21, ≥ 22.5 mm for size 23 and ≥ 24 mm for size 25, and ≥ 25 mm for size XL/27
- Subjects with myocardial infarction \< 90 days before the planned valve implant surgery
- Subjects with known hypersensitivity to nickel alloys
- The subject has a documented history of substance (drug or alcohol) abuse
- +4 more criteria
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Corcym S.r.llead
Study Sites (26)
Universitäts-Klinik für Chirurgie
Graz, 8036, Austria
Universitätsklinik für Chirurgie
Vienna, 1090, Austria
Onze-Lieve-Vrouw (OLV) Ziekenhuis
Aalst, 9300, Belgium
UZ Leuven
Leuven, 3000, Belgium
CHRU de Lille
Lille, 59037, France
CHU - Nantes
Nantes, France
Institut Mutualiste Montsouris
Paris, 75014, France
Hôpital Cardiologique du Haut-Lévêque
Pessac, 33604, France
Herz- und Gefässzentrum Bad Bevensen
Bad Bevensen, 29549, Germany
RHÖN Klinikum AG, Herz- und Gefäß-Klinik GmbH
Bad Neustadt an der Saale, 97616, Germany
Herz- und Diabeteszentrum NRW
Bad Oeynhausen, 32545, Germany
Ruhr Universität Bochum
Bochum, 44789, Germany
Städtisches Klinikum Braunschweig
Braunschweig, 38126, Germany
Westdeutsches Herzzentrum
Essen, 45122, Germany
Universitäres Herzzentrum Hamburg GmbH
Hamburg, 20246, Germany
Medizinische Hochschule Hannover
Hanover, 30625, Germany
Herzzentrum Leipzig
Leipzig, 04289, Germany
Deutsches Herzzentrum
Munich, 80636, Germany
Klinikum Nürnberg Süd
Nuremberg, 90471, Germany
Klinikum Oldenburg GmbH
Oldenburg, 26133, Germany
Academic Medical Center, Division of Cardio-thoracic Surgery
Amsterdam, 1100 DE, Netherlands
Catharina Ziekenhuis
Eindhoven, 5623 EJ, Netherlands
St. Antonius Ziekenhuis
Nieuwegein, 3435, Netherlands
Silesian Center for Heart Diseases
Zabrze, 41800, Poland
Inselspital, Universitätsklinik für Herz- und Gefässchirurgie
Bern, 3010, Switzerland
Genfield General Hospital
Leicester, LE39QP, United Kingdom
Related Publications (1)
Fischlein T, Meuris B, Folliguet T, Hakim-Meibodi K, Misfeld M, Carrel T, Zembala M, Cerutti E, Asch FM, Haverich A; CAVALIER Trial Investigators. Midterm outcomes with a sutureless aortic bioprosthesis in a prospective multicenter cohort study. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2022 Dec;164(6):1772-1780.e11. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2020.12.109. Epub 2021 Jan 13.
PMID: 33597099RESULT
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
A. Haverich, Prof.
Hannover Medical School
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
June 7, 2011
First Posted
June 8, 2011
Study Start
February 23, 2010
Primary Completion
October 31, 2014
Study Completion
January 31, 2020
Last Updated
March 6, 2024
Record last verified: 2024-03