NCT01518582

Brief Summary

This is a prospective clinical study to assess the performance of the prosthesis according to a composite success criterion. The clinical and functional results and the patient's quality of life up to 24 months of follow-up will also be recorded. Granvia-c is a device NOT FDA-approved and NOT under investigation in the USA.

Trial Health

90
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
70

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for all trials

Timeline
Completed

Started Aug 2012

Longer than P75 for all trials

Geographic Reach
2 countries

3 active sites

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

January 5, 2012

Completed
21 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

January 26, 2012

Completed
6 months until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

August 1, 2012

Completed
3.8 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

June 1, 2016

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

June 1, 2016

Completed
Last Updated

June 28, 2016

Status Verified

June 1, 2016

Enrollment Period

3.8 years

First QC Date

January 5, 2012

Last Update Submit

June 27, 2016

Conditions

Keywords

Cervicobrachialneuralgiasymptomatic cervical discopathy

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Composite criterion of success

    the success is defined by a composite criterion of 4 points. The surgery will be a success only if there is: * A 15-point improvement in the NDI score from the preoperative baseline score * Maintenance or improvement of the pre-op baseline neurological status * Absence of secondary surgical intervention * Absence of serious adverse event

    24Months

Secondary Outcomes (8)

  • Radiologic evaluation of the motion

    Preop, 3M, 12M and 24M

  • Evaluation of potential peri and post-operative adverse events related or not to prosthesis.

    preop, 3M, 12M, 24M

  • Evaluation of satisfaction

    Preop, 3M, 12M and 24M

  • Evaluation of the time to return to activities (normal activity, work, sport activity)

    preop, 3M, 12M, 24M

  • Evaluation of Pain

    Preop, 3M, 12M and 24M

  • +3 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (1)

Radiculopathy Cervical

Radiculopathy, Cervical

Device: Cervical arthroplasty surgery with Granvia-C

Interventions

Discectomy and Cervical arthroplasty according to standard practice of the surgeon

Radiculopathy Cervical

Eligibility Criteria

Age21 Years - 55 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64)
Sampling MethodNon-Probability Sample
Study Population

People with Cervicobrachial neuralgia due to symptomatic cervical discopathy

You may qualify if:

  • Cervicobrachial neuralgia due to symptomatic cervical discopathy
  • Presence of pain (arm or arm and neck) and/or a neurologic deficit with a radiographic confirmation (by CT, MRI, X-ray, etc.) of any of the following:
  • Herniated nucleus pulposus
  • Spondylosis (defined by the presence of osteophytes)
  • Degenerative Disc Disease at a single level or 2-level(s) adjacent or not between C3 and C7

You may not qualify if:

  • Asymptomatic degenerative disc disease (DDD)
  • DDD of 3-levels or more
  • Axial neck pain as the solitary symptom
  • Severe spondylosis at the level to be treated by arthroplasty as
  • Characterized by any of the following:
  • Bridging osteophytes
  • A loss of disc height greater than 50% (compared to adjacent levels)
  • Absence of motion (\<2°)
  • Any prior spine surgery at any cervical level, especially fusion procedure; views) for the level operated by arthroplasty
  • Tumor
  • Deformity or fracture of the cervical vertebrae
  • Active systemic infection or infection at the operative site(s)
  • Pregnant or interested in becoming pregnant in the next three years;
  • Advanced emphysema, Alzheimer's disease or other medical conditions that would interfere with patient self-assessment of function, pain or quality of life

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (3)

CHR Namur

Namur, 5000, Belgium

Location

Tripode Hospital

Bordeaux, 33000, France

Location

Clairval hospital

Marseille, 13009, France

Location

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Brachial Plexus NeuritisNeuralgia

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Brachial Plexus NeuropathiesPeripheral Nervous System DiseasesNeuromuscular DiseasesNervous System DiseasesNeuritisPainNeurologic ManifestationsSigns and SymptomsPathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms

Study Officials

  • John Yeh, MD

    Royal London Hospital, UK

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
  • Frédéric Schils, MD

    CHC Liège, Belgium

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
  • Hans Meisel, MD

    Halle Klinike, Germany

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
  • Patrick Guérin, MD

    University Hospital, Bordeaux

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
observational
Observational Model
COHORT
Time Perspective
PROSPECTIVE
Sponsor Type
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

January 5, 2012

First Posted

January 26, 2012

Study Start

August 1, 2012

Primary Completion

June 1, 2016

Study Completion

June 1, 2016

Last Updated

June 28, 2016

Record last verified: 2016-06

Locations