NCT04547959

Brief Summary

This study includes one type of product named C-CURVE which is a Stand-alone Cervical Interbody Cage. This product is available in two materials: PEEK and Titanium. The C-Curve Cervical Interbody Devices is one single implant used for insertion between two adjacent vertebrae (cervical spine). C-Curve has been designed to restore and/or maintain adequate interbody height, and thus help stabilize one or more cervical levels while fusion occurs. This system has also as objectives to increase of the quality of life, decrease patient's pain and decrease a potential dysphagia (clinical performances). This system must only be used in the cervical spine. This post-market clinical follow-up (PMCF) study aims to confirm the acceptable benefits/risk profile of the device for the patients and to fill essential requirements to maintain the CE mark through a clinical evaluation.

Trial Health

90
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
82

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Nov 2020

Longer than P75 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
2 countries

10 active sites

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

September 7, 2020

Completed
7 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

September 14, 2020

Completed
2 months until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

November 20, 2020

Completed
3.9 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

October 1, 2024

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

October 1, 2024

Completed
Last Updated

January 13, 2025

Status Verified

January 1, 2025

Enrollment Period

3.9 years

First QC Date

September 7, 2020

Last Update Submit

January 9, 2025

Conditions

Keywords

cervical disc diseasecervical disc degenerationC-CURVE , cervical interbody cage

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Fusion of the cervical interbody cage used

    Measures the bone fusion thanks to the CTscan

    24 months

Secondary Outcomes (8)

  • Fusion of the cervical interbody cage used

    6, 12 and 24 months

  • Quality of life with modified SF-12

    Preoperative, and 6, 12 and 24 months postoperative

  • Satisfaction patient

    6, 12 and 24 months

  • VAS (Pain)

    Preoperative, and 6, 12 and 24 months postoperative

  • NDI(Neck Disability Index)

    Preoperative, and 6, 12 and 24 months postoperative

  • +3 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (1)

C-CURVE Titane

EXPERIMENTAL

According the routine practice of the investigator surgeon, the interbody cage C-CURVE in Titane is used

Device: cervical interbody cage C-CURVE

Interventions

ACDF: Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion with a C-CURVE cage

C-CURVE Titane

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Patient operated with C-CURVE TITANIUM (MEDICREA) for one or several levels (3 maximum)
  • Cage implanted with the bone graft "OSMOSYS" (MEDICREA) or an auto bone graft from patients
  • Patient ≥ 18 years
  • Patient affiliated to health care insurance (social security in France)
  • Patient who signed an informed consent form
  • Patient able and willing to complete a self-administered questionnaire
  • Patient able to understand protocol and the planning visit and willing to perform all of them
  • Patient with a pathology indicated in the instruction for use of the implant

You may not qualify if:

  • Patient with no preoperative data available (X-rays, questionnaires)
  • Hybrid installation or cervical additional fixation
  • Patient contraindicated for X-ray(s) and/or CT-Scan(s)
  • Patient with contraindications indicated in the instruction for use of the implant
  • Patient judged as non-compliant by the investigator, not unable to come back for the follow-up visits (for example: patient living more than 100 km away).
  • Patient who declined to participate to the study or unable to give his consent Vulnerable population as explained in the protocol

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (10)

CH WAPI

Tournai, Belgium

Location

Clinique Belharra

Bayonne, France

Location

Clinique du Parc

Castelnau-le-Lez, France

Location

Groupe Hospitalier La Rochelle-Re-Aunis

La Rochelle, France

Location

Centre de consultations spécialisées de la Sauvegarde

Lyon, France

Location

Centre Orthopédique Santy

Lyon, France

Location

Clinique Clairval

Marseille, France

Location

Clinique de l'Union

Saint-Jean, 31240, France

Location

Clinique Charcot

Sainte-Foy-lès-Lyon, France

Location

CHRU Bretonneau

Tours, France

Location

Related Publications (11)

  • Alimi M, Njoku I, Hofstetter CP, Tsiouris AJ, Kesavabhotla K, Boockvar J, Navarro-Ramirez R, Hartl R. Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion (ACDF): Comparison Between Zero Profile Implants and Anterior Cervical Plate and Spacer. Cureus. 2016 Apr 17;8(4):e573. doi: 10.7759/cureus.573.

    PMID: 27200226BACKGROUND
  • Azab W, Abdel-Razek M, Ali A, Abdelrahman A, Salaheldin W, Nasim K, Attia H, Soliman D. Outcome evaluation of a zero-profile implant for anterior cervical diskectomy with fusion. Turk Neurosurg. 2012;22(5):611-7. doi: 10.5137/1019-5149.JTN.5646-11.2.

    PMID: 23015339BACKGROUND
  • Barbagallo GM, Romano D, Certo F, Milone P, Albanese V. Zero-P: a new zero-profile cage-plate device for single and multilevel ACDF. A single institution series with four years maximum follow-up and review of the literature on zero-profile devices. Eur Spine J. 2013 Nov;22 Suppl 6(Suppl 6):S868-78. doi: 10.1007/s00586-013-3005-0. Epub 2013 Sep 24.

    PMID: 24061968BACKGROUND
  • Bucci MN, Oh D, Cowan RS, Davis RJ, Jackson RJ, Tyndall DS, Nehls D. The ROI-C zero-profile anchored spacer for anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: biomechanical profile and clinical outcomes. Med Devices (Auckl). 2017 Apr 18;10:61-69. doi: 10.2147/MDER.S127133. eCollection 2017.

    PMID: 28458586BACKGROUND
  • Chen Y, Liu Y, Chen H, Cao P, Yuan W. Comparison of Curvature Between the Zero-P Spacer and Traditional Cage and Plate After 3-Level Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion: Mid-term Results. Clin Spine Surg. 2017 Oct;30(8):E1111-E1116. doi: 10.1097/BSD.0000000000000440.

    PMID: 27642818BACKGROUND
  • De Leo-Vargas RA, Munoz-Romero I, Mondragon-Soto MG, Martinez-Anda JJ. Locking Stand-Alone Cage Constructs for the Treatment of Cervical Spine Degenerative Disease. Asian Spine J. 2019 Apr 10;13(4):630-637. doi: 10.31616/asj.2018.0234. Print 2019 Aug.

    PMID: 30962412BACKGROUND
  • Lee YS, Kim YB, Park SW. Does a zero-profile anchored cage offer additional stabilization as anterior cervical plate? Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2015 May 15;40(10):E563-70. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000000864.

    PMID: 25955093BACKGROUND
  • Li Z, Zhao Y, Tang J, Ren D, Guo J, Wang H, Li L, Hou S. A comparison of a new zero-profile, stand-alone Fidji cervical cage and anterior cervical plate for single and multilevel ACDF: a minimum 2-year follow-up study. Eur Spine J. 2017 Apr;26(4):1129-1139. doi: 10.1007/s00586-016-4739-2. Epub 2016 Aug 23.

    PMID: 27554353BACKGROUND
  • Lu Y, Bao W, Wang Z, Zhou F, Zou J, Jiang W, Yang H, Zhang Z, Zhu X. Comparison of the clinical effects of zero-profile anchored spacer (ROI-C) and conventional cage-plate construct for the treatment of noncontiguous bilevel of cervical degenerative disc disease (CDDD): A minimum 2-year follow-up. Medicine (Baltimore). 2018 Feb;97(5):e9808. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000009808.

    PMID: 29384883BACKGROUND
  • Nambiar M, Phan K, Cunningham JE, Yang Y, Turner PL, Mobbs R. Locking stand-alone cages versus anterior plate constructs in single-level fusion for degenerative cervical disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Spine J. 2017 Sep;26(9):2258-2266. doi: 10.1007/s00586-017-5015-9. Epub 2017 Mar 10.

    PMID: 28283840BACKGROUND
  • Scholz M, Schelfaut S, Pingel A, Schleicher P, Kandziora F. A cervical "zero-profile" cage with integrated angle-stable fixation: 24-months results. Acta Orthop Belg. 2014 Dec;80(4):558-66.

    PMID: 26280730BACKGROUND

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
NA
Masking
NONE
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
SINGLE GROUP
Model Details: Prospective, multicenter, non-comparative and interventional post market clinical follow-up
Sponsor Type
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

September 7, 2020

First Posted

September 14, 2020

Study Start

November 20, 2020

Primary Completion

October 1, 2024

Study Completion

October 1, 2024

Last Updated

January 13, 2025

Record last verified: 2025-01

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations