NCT01516684

Brief Summary

This randomized clinical trial studies local anesthetic (EMLA) cream in younger patients undergoing lumbar punctures (LP). A local anesthetic cream may be effective for numbing the skin and reducing movement when applied prior to lumbar punctures and may reduce the amount of sedation necessary

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
33

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for phase_2

Timeline
Completed

Started May 2012

Longer than P75 for phase_2

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

January 20, 2012

Completed
5 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

January 25, 2012

Completed
4 months until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

May 14, 2012

Completed
6.1 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

June 26, 2018

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

June 26, 2018

Completed
1.2 years until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

September 6, 2019

Completed
Last Updated

September 6, 2019

Status Verified

August 1, 2019

Enrollment Period

6.1 years

First QC Date

January 20, 2012

Results QC Date

June 27, 2019

Last Update Submit

August 12, 2019

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Total Dose of Propofol Administered to Each Patient

    Analyzed using descriptive statistics and mixed model regression methods. Raw mean total dose administered and raw percentage of times additional propofol was administered will be presented by sedation group treating each event (sedation with lumbar puncture) as the unit. T-test and chi-square tests will be performed as appropriate.

    20 minutes after sedation

Secondary Outcomes (4)

  • Level of Movement (no Movement, Minor Movement, Major Movement, Other) After EMLA Cream or Placebo Cream Administration

    At the time of LP insertion

  • Complications Including Any Change in Vital Signs That Requires Intervention by the Sedation Team, as Well as Post-LP Headache From Sedation With or Without EMLA Cream

    Within one week of the LP

  • Traumatic Lumbar Punctures After EMLA Cream or Placebo Cream Administration

    20 minutes after lumbar puncture

  • Complications Including Any Change in Vital Signs That Requires Intervention by the Sedation Team, Post-LP Back Pain From Sedation With or Without EMLA Cream

    Within one week of the LP

Study Arms (2)

Arm I (EMLA)

EXPERIMENTAL

Patients receive topical EMLA cream 60 minutes to 4 hours prior to the LP followed by standard sedation with fentanyl citrate and propofol.

Drug: EMLADrug: propofolDrug: fentanyl citrate

Arm II (placebo)

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Patients receive topical placebo cream 60 minutes to 4 hours prior to the LP followed by standard sedation with fentanyl citrate and propofol.

Drug: placebo administrationDrug: propofolDrug: fentanyl citrate

Interventions

Given topically

Arm II (placebo)
EMLADRUG

Given topically

Also known as: eutectic mixture of local anesthetics, lidocaine-prilocaine, lidocaine-prilocaine eutectic mixture
Arm I (EMLA)

Given IV

Also known as: Diprivan
Arm I (EMLA)Arm II (placebo)

Given IV

Also known as: Actiq, Oralet, Sublimaze
Arm I (EMLA)Arm II (placebo)

Eligibility Criteria

AgeUp to 22 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsChild (0-17), Adult (18-64)

You may qualify if:

  • Pediatric oncology patients undergoing a lumbar puncture in the Pediatric Sedation Suite; patients may or may not be receiving intrathecal chemotherapy

You may not qualify if:

  • Patients undergoing additional procedures during the same anesthetic such as bone marrow aspirate or biopsy will be excluded because they will likely require higher doses of propofol than those undergoing LP alone Patients who are allergic to or not tolerant of EMLA cream, propofol, or fentanyl will be excluded Patients who are pregnant will be excluded Patients having their LPs done by students will be excluded

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Wake Forest University Health Sciences

Winston-Salem, North Carolina, 27157, United States

Location

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Neoplasms

Interventions

Lidocaine, Prilocaine Drug CombinationPropofolFentanyl

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

LidocaineAcetanilidesAnilidesAmidesOrganic ChemicalsPrilocaineAniline CompoundsAminesDrug CombinationsPharmaceutical PreparationsPhenolsBenzene DerivativesHydrocarbons, AromaticHydrocarbons, CyclicHydrocarbonsPiperidinesHeterocyclic Compounds, 1-RingHeterocyclic Compounds

Results Point of Contact

Title
Thomas McLean
Organization
Wake Forest University Health Sciences

Study Officials

  • Dudley Hammon

    Wake Forest University Health Sciences

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
Yes

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 2
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
DOUBLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR
Purpose
SUPPORTIVE CARE
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

January 20, 2012

First Posted

January 25, 2012

Study Start

May 14, 2012

Primary Completion

June 26, 2018

Study Completion

June 26, 2018

Last Updated

September 6, 2019

Results First Posted

September 6, 2019

Record last verified: 2019-08

Locations