NCT01500746

Brief Summary

This study evaluates the effectiveness of pulse lavage therapy in decreasing bacterial counts in chronic wounds.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
8

participants targeted

Target at below P25 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Dec 2011

Typical duration for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

December 1, 2011

Completed
22 days until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

December 23, 2011

Completed
5 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

December 28, 2011

Completed
1.8 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

October 1, 2013

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

October 1, 2013

Completed
7 months until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

April 14, 2014

Completed
Last Updated

April 14, 2014

Status Verified

March 1, 2014

Enrollment Period

1.8 years

First QC Date

December 23, 2011

Results QC Date

January 20, 2014

Last Update Submit

March 10, 2014

Conditions

Keywords

chronic wound treatmentpulse lavageserial pulse lavagewoundsbacterial colonization of wounds

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (2)

  • Change in Bacterial Counts

    A punch biopsy of the wound will be taken once the subject is enrolled in the study. A repeat biopsy will be taken after the 8th lavage treatment or the 8th dressing change. These will be sent for bacterial count analysis and the difference in bacterial counts will be evaluated. The lavage fluid from baseline measurements will be filtered and sent for bacterial counts and will be compared to the filtered fluid from the last lavage treatment. In addition, surface swabs will be taken at the beginning and end of the study and will be sent for bacterial counts as well. Bacterial counts from these lavage, biopsy specimen, and swabs will be averaged and analyzed.

    Baseline and at 4 days

  • Change in Gene Expression Analysis

    A punch biopsy will be taken at the beginning of the study. this will be sent for gene expression analysis. A repeat biopsy at the end of the study will also be sent at the end of the study, and a change in gene expression in analysis will be evaluated.

    4 days

Secondary Outcomes (1)

  • Pain With Lavage Treatments

    4 days

Study Arms (2)

Lavage arm

EXPERIMENTAL

This group will serve as the experimental arm. They will undergo twice daily pulse lavage of their wounds for 4 days. In between the lavage treatments, their wounds will be dressed with moist gauze.

Procedure: Pulse lavage treatment

Moist dressings

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

This group will serve as the control group. They will undergo twice daily dressing changes with moist gauze dressings for a total of 4 days (8 dressing changes). Bacterial counts and gene expression analysis will be performed prior to the first dressing change and after the last dressing change.

Other: Dressing changes

Interventions

A pulse lavage machine will be used to irrigate the wound with a total of 4 liters of water, twice daily, for a total of 4 days (8 treatments).

Also known as: Pulsed lavage (Stryker Pulsavac Plus), Wound containment apparatus
Lavage arm

Wounds will be treated with moist gauze dressing changes twice daily for a total of 4 days (8 treatments).

Moist dressings

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 85 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Patients must have a chronic wound (as defined by the wound being present for \>30 days) located on any part of their body
  • The wound must be smaller than 10cm in greatest diameter.
  • Patients must have an expected remaining hospital duration of 4 days
  • Patients must be willing and able to comply with all study procedures

You may not qualify if:

  • Patients must not have undergone any surgical excisions or debridements of the wound in the past 30 days
  • The wound may not undergo any surgical procedures or other treatments other than the study treatments during the course of the study.
  • The wound may not require any immediate surgical intervention or debridement
  • Patients may not start any new antibiotic therapy during the course of the study
  • Must not have an allergy to skin adhesives.
  • Patients must not be taking any immunosuppressive medications.
  • Subjects who, in the opinion of the investigator, may not complete the study for any reason.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Northwestern Memorial Hospital

Chicago, Illinois, 60611, United States

Location

Related Publications (6)

  • Brown LL, Shelton HT, Bornside GH, Cohn I Jr. Evaluation of wound irrigation by pulsatile jet and conventional methods. Ann Surg. 1978 Feb;187(2):170-3. doi: 10.1097/00000658-197802000-00013.

    PMID: 343735BACKGROUND
  • Granick MS, Tenenhaus M, Knox KR, Ulm JP. Comparison of wound irrigation and tangential hydrodissection in bacterial clearance of contaminated wounds: results of a randomized, controlled clinical study. Ostomy Wound Manage. 2007 Apr;53(4):64-6, 68-70, 72.

    PMID: 17449917BACKGROUND
  • Kuehn BM. Chronic wound care guidelines issued. JAMA. 2007 Mar 7;297(9):938-9. doi: 10.1001/jama.297.9.938. No abstract available.

    PMID: 17341696BACKGROUND
  • Svoboda SJ, Bice TG, Gooden HA, Brooks DE, Thomas DB, Wenke JC. Comparison of bulb syringe and pulsed lavage irrigation with use of a bioluminescent musculoskeletal wound model. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2006 Oct;88(10):2167-74. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.E.00248.

    PMID: 17015593BACKGROUND
  • Keblish DJ, DeMaio M. Early pulsatile lavage for the decontamination of combat wounds: historical review and point proposal. Mil Med. 1998 Dec;163(12):844-6.

    PMID: 9866365BACKGROUND
  • Luedtke-Hoffmann KA, Schafer DS. Pulsed lavage in wound cleansing. Phys Ther. 2000 Mar;80(3):292-300. No abstract available.

    PMID: 10696155BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Wounds and Injuries

Results Point of Contact

Title
Dr. Elliot Hirsch
Organization
Northwestern University

Study Officials

  • Robert D Galiano, MD

    Northwestern University

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
No
Restrictive Agreement
No

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Assistant Professor of Surgery

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

December 23, 2011

First Posted

December 28, 2011

Study Start

December 1, 2011

Primary Completion

October 1, 2013

Study Completion

October 1, 2013

Last Updated

April 14, 2014

Results First Posted

April 14, 2014

Record last verified: 2014-03

Locations