NCT01499654

Brief Summary

This study is recruiting patients already scheduled for a single photon emission computed tomography myocardial perfusion imaging (SPECT-MPI) test. SPECT-MPI is a nuclear imaging technique that uses a radioactive substance, or radiotracer, and special equipment to create three-dimensional (3D) images of the heart. Radiotracer is a radioactive dye that will make the structures of the heart visible and is routinely used to view blood flow in the heart, scan for damaged heart tissue, or assess heart function. For a routine SPECT-MPI test, the radiotracer is given in one dose at the beginning of the test, followed by taking resting images of the heart. For this study, researchers would like to administer half of the radiotracer, obtain resting images, administer the remainder of the radiotracer and obtain a second set of resting images. Participants will receive the same amount of radioactive material that would normally be given for this test; however, it will be administered in two half-doses. Participation in this study will add about 30 minutes to the time it takes to complete the routine test. The investigators expect to enroll about 160 subjects in this study at Northwestern.

Trial Health

57
Monitor

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
64

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Oct 2011

Typical duration for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
terminated

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

October 1, 2011

Completed
3 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

December 19, 2011

Completed
7 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

December 26, 2011

Completed
2.9 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

December 1, 2014

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

December 1, 2014

Completed
1.2 years until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

February 24, 2016

Completed
Last Updated

February 24, 2016

Status Verified

January 1, 2016

Enrollment Period

3.2 years

First QC Date

December 19, 2011

Results QC Date

December 18, 2015

Last Update Submit

January 27, 2016

Conditions

Keywords

SPECT MPITomography, Emission-Computed, Single-PhotonWide Beam Reconstruction

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (2)

  • Sum Rest Score

    Left ventricular myocardium was divided into standardized 17-segments with 6 equiangular segments in the basal region, 6 equiangular segments in the mid region, 4 equiangular segments in the apical regions, and 1 region in the apex (Cerqueira MD, et al., J Nucl Cardiol 2002;9:240-5). Each segment was scored on a scale from 0 to 4 to indicate the severity of the perfusion defect (0=no perfusion defect; 1=mild perfusion defect; 2=moderate perfusion defect; 3=severe perfusion defect; and 4=absent perfusion). The scores over 17 segments were summed to report the Sum Rest Score (SRS), ie. the greater the SRS, the larger the perfusion defect.

    Baseline

  • Segments With Resting Perfusion Defect

    Left ventricular myocardium was divided into standardized 17-segments with 6 equiangular segments in the basal region, 6 equiangular segments in the mid region, 4 equiangular segments in the apical regions, and 1 region in the apex (Cerqueira MD, et al., J Nucl Cardiol 2002;9:240-5). Each segment was scored on a scale from 0 to 4 to indicate the severity of the perfusion defect (0=no perfusion defect; 1=mild perfusion defect; 2=moderate perfusion defect; 3=severe perfusion defect; and 4=absent perfusion). The number of segments with a score of 1 or greater were summed to obtain the number of segments with a resting perfusion defect.

    Baseline

Secondary Outcomes (2)

  • Image Quality Score

    Baseline

  • Diagnostic Confidence Score

    Baseline

Study Arms (1)

Half-dose radiotracer administration

EXPERIMENTAL

For this study, researchers would like to administer half of the radiotracer, obtain resting images, administer the remainder of the radiotracer and obtain a second set of resting images. Subjects will be given the same amount of radioactive material that would normally be given for this test; however, it will be administered in two ½ doses.

Drug: Half-dose of the Tc99-m sestamibi (Cardiolite)

Interventions

Researchers will administer half of the radiotracer (Cardiolite), obtain resting images, administer the remainder of the radiotracer and obtain a second set of resting images. Subjects will be given the same amount of radioactive material that would normally be given for this test; however, it will be administered in two ½ doses.

Also known as: technetium (Tc-99m) sestamibi, Cardiolite
Half-dose radiotracer administration

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Patients over the age of 18 years
  • Undergoing nuclear stress testing
  • History of myocardial infarction, cardiomyopathy, heart failure or prior nuclear studies with resting perfusion defects

You may not qualify if:

  • Unwilling or unable to undergo an additional resting SPECT acquisition
  • Clinical contraindications to nuclear stress testing including acute myocardial infarction
  • For patients undergoing exercise treadmill stress testing:
  • Left bundle branch block or artificial ventricular pacemaker
  • For patients undergoing regadenoson (Lexiscan) stress testing:
  • Moderate to severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease or asthma, second- or third degree atrioventricular block or sinus node disease (unless patients have a functioning artificial pacemaker), known hypersensitivity to aminophylline or adenosine
  • Inability to give informed consent

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Northwestern University

Chicago, Illinois, 60611, United States

Location

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Myocardial InfarctionMyocardial Ischemia

Interventions

Technetium Tc 99m SestamibiTechnetium

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Heart DiseasesCardiovascular DiseasesVascular DiseasesInfarctionIschemiaPathologic ProcessesPathological Conditions, Signs and SymptomsNecrosis

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

NitrilesOrganic ChemicalsOrganotechnetium CompoundsOrganometallic CompoundsElements, RadioactiveElementsInorganic ChemicalsMetals, HeavyTransition ElementsRadioisotopesIsotopesMetals

Limitations and Caveats

Early termination of study lead to a small numbers of subjects analyzed. Technical problems in WBR processing settings including acquisition matrix sizes and/or number of iterations.

Results Point of Contact

Title
Edwin Wu, MD
Organization
Northwestern University

Study Officials

  • Edwin Wu, M.D., FACC

    Northwestern University

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
No
Restrictive Agreement
No

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
NA
Masking
NONE
Purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Intervention Model
SINGLE GROUP
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Associate Professor of Medicine and Radiology

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

December 19, 2011

First Posted

December 26, 2011

Study Start

October 1, 2011

Primary Completion

December 1, 2014

Study Completion

December 1, 2014

Last Updated

February 24, 2016

Results First Posted

February 24, 2016

Record last verified: 2016-01

Locations