Imaging for Significant Prostate Cancer Risk Evaluation
PICTURE
PICTURE - Prostate Imaging (Multi-parametric MRI and Prostate HistoScanning™) Compared to Transperineal Ultrasound Guided Biopsy for Significant Prostate Cancer Risk Evaluation.
1 other identifier
interventional
126
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The incidence of prostate cancer is rising however the number of deaths from prostate cancer is stable. Meaning the investigators are diagnosing many men with prostate cancer that will not impact on their life. The rise in incidence is mainly due to increased use of the blood test Prostate Specific Antigen (PSA), as a screening test. Currently men suspected of having prostate cancer, identified by a raised PSA undergo trans-rectal ultrasound guided prostate biopsy (TRUS biopsy). Many men have this test unnecessarily, only 1/3 being diagnosed with prostate cancer. TRUS biopsy is problematic as it is random and performed blind-the operator does not know where the cancer is. Thus many low-risk cancers that do not need treating are diagnosed and many high risk cancers are missed or incorrectly classified. So, men with a negative biopsy or those with low risk disease are usually advised to undergo another TRUS biopsy. An imaging test is needed that could help men and their doctors decide whether the biopsy is a true reflection of what is inside his prostate. The investigators will test the role of two imaging tests. The first, multi-parametric magnetic resonance imaging (mp-MRI) uses magnetic signals from the body to form images. The second, Prostate HistoScanning™ (PHS) uses sound-waves. The investigators will compare the results of these tests with a detailed biopsy map-transperineal template prostate mapping biopsy (which is currently the best way to find out what is in the prostate but requires multiple biopsies to be taken under general anaesthetic. Eligible men will have undergone one or more TRUS biopsies and who have been advised to have further tests on as part of standard of care. They will be recruited from UCLH referral letters and clinics. The investigators aim is to see if either of these tests can confidently rule out the presence of clinically important disease.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable prostate-cancer
Started Dec 2011
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable prostate-cancer
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
December 1, 2011
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
December 6, 2011
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
December 14, 2011
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
July 1, 2013
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
July 1, 2013
CompletedDecember 30, 2011
December 1, 2011
1.6 years
December 6, 2011
December 28, 2011
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Number of men who could avoid repeat biopsy as determined by the Negative predictive value and specificity of mp-MRI for Clinically significant disease.
Performance characteristics of mp-MRI for ruling out CLINICALLY SIGNIFICANT prostate cancer as determined by negative predictive value and specificity
18 months
Number of men who could avoid repeat biopsy as determined by the negative predictive value and specificity of Prostate HistoScanning for Clinically significant disease.
Performance characteristics of Prostate HistoScanning for ruling out CLINICALLY SIGNIFICANT prostate cancer as determined by negative predictive value and specificity
18 months
Secondary Outcomes (6)
Proportion of men correctly identified as having no cancer on Imaging (mp-MRI and Prostate HistoScanning)
18 months
Number of men correctly identified by Imaging (mp-MRI and Prostate HistoScanning) to have CLINICALLY SIGNIFICANT disease
18 months
Test- retest reproducibility of Prostate HistoScanning™.
18 months
Proportion of patients with correct disease risk stratification using MRI/US guided biopsies as determined by sensitivity and specificity
18 months
Number of patients with bothersome Lower Urinary tract symptoms following Transperineal Template Mapping biopsy
18 months
- +1 more secondary outcomes
Interventions
Advanced Ultrasound assessment of the prostate
Multi-sequence Magnetic resonance imaging of the prostate
Needle biopsy of the perineum via the transperineal route at 5mm intervals guided by the use of ultrasound.
Biopsies targeted to lesions seen at a) Prostate HistoScanning and b) mp-MRI. In men with an MRI lesion further MRI/US registration biopsies will be obtained
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Men who have undergone prior trans-rectal biopsies.
- Men undergoing further evaluation of their prostate and who are seeking characterisation using Transperineal Template Prostate Mapping Biopsy.
You may not qualify if:
- Previous history of prostate cancer treatment
- Men unable to have MRI scan, or in whom artefact would reduce quality of MRI.
- Men unable to have general or regional anaesthesia
- Men unable to give informed consent
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
University College London Hospitals
London, London, NW1 2PG, United Kingdom
Related Publications (3)
Simmons LAM, Kanthabalan A, Arya M, Briggs T, Charman SC, Freeman A, Gelister J, Jameson C, McCartan N, Moore CM, van der Muelen J, Emberton M, Ahmed HU. Prostate Imaging Compared to Transperineal Ultrasound-guided biopsy for significant prostate cancer Risk Evaluation (PICTURE): a prospective cohort validating study assessing Prostate HistoScanning. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. 2019 May;22(2):261-267. doi: 10.1038/s41391-018-0094-1. Epub 2018 Oct 2.
PMID: 30279583DERIVEDSimmons LAM, Kanthabalan A, Arya M, Briggs T, Barratt D, Charman SC, Freeman A, Hawkes D, Hu Y, Jameson C, McCartan N, Moore CM, Punwani S, van der Muelen J, Emberton M, Ahmed HU. Accuracy of Transperineal Targeted Prostate Biopsies, Visual Estimation and Image Fusion in Men Needing Repeat Biopsy in the PICTURE Trial. J Urol. 2018 Dec;200(6):1227-1234. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2018.07.001. Epub 2018 Jul 11.
PMID: 30017964DERIVEDMiah S, Eldred-Evans D, Simmons LAM, Shah TT, Kanthabalan A, Arya M, Winkler M, McCartan N, Freeman A, Punwani S, Moore CM, Emberton M, Ahmed HU. Patient Reported Outcome Measures for Transperineal Template Prostate Mapping Biopsies in the PICTURE Study. J Urol. 2018 Dec;200(6):1235-1240. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2018.06.033. Epub 2018 Jun 27.
PMID: 29940251DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Mark Emberton, MBBS,MD,FRCS
University College London Hospitals
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- DIAGNOSTIC
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Professor of Interventional Oncology
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
December 6, 2011
First Posted
December 14, 2011
Study Start
December 1, 2011
Primary Completion
July 1, 2013
Study Completion
July 1, 2013
Last Updated
December 30, 2011
Record last verified: 2011-12