A Randomized Study to Abate Truancy and Violence in Grades 3-9 in Chicago Public Schools
Preventing Truancy in Urban Schools Through Provision of Social Services by Truancy Officers
4 other identifiers
interventional
5,300
1 country
1
Brief Summary
In partnership with the Chicago Public Schools (CPS), the goal of this project is to test the effectiveness of a manualized mentoring and case management program for students in grades 1-8. Most of the current policy and research attention on dropout has focused on the dropout decision itself, even though dropout is more likely to be simply the end point of a longer-term developmental process. This project seeks to learn more about the relative effectiveness of preventing dropout through mentoring and case management programs, and to learn more about the relative effectiveness of intervening early vs. later.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Sep 2011
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
September 1, 2011
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
November 18, 2011
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
December 7, 2011
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
September 1, 2015
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
August 1, 2020
CompletedSeptember 9, 2020
September 1, 2020
4 years
November 18, 2011
September 4, 2020
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Change in attendance and truancy
Attendance and truancy measured through school records on absences
2 times a year (on average every 6 months) during the intervention and 1 time a year each year following the completion of the intervention for up to 25 years
Secondary Outcomes (5)
Criminal activity and involvement
1 time a year each year following the completion of the intervention for up to 25 years
Employment history and workforce involvement
1 time a year each year following the completion of the intervention for up to 25 years
Health and medical system participation
1 time a year each year following the completion of the intervention for up to 25 years
Academic achievement
1 time a year each year during the intervention and 1 time a year each year following the completion of the intervention for up to 25 years
School engagement
1 time a year each year during the intervention and 1 time a year each year following the completion of the intervention for up to 25 years
Study Arms (1)
Check & Connect
EXPERIMENTALCheck and Connect Structured Mentoring and Case Management
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Student with 10-27 total absences in prior school year
- Students in Grades 1-7 at start of 2011-2012 or 2013-14 school years
- In attendance at one of the Chicago Public Schools elementary/middle schools randomly selected to be offered the intervention
You may not qualify if:
- None
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Chicago Public Schools
Chicago, Illinois, 60603, United States
Related Publications (5)
Allensworth, E. M. & John Q. Easton (2007). "What Matters for Staying On-Track and Graduating in Chicago Public High Schools." Chicago, Consortium on Chicago School Research.
BACKGROUNDChristenson, S.L, Sinclair M.F., Evelo D.L., and C.M. Hurley (1998) "Promoting school engagement with school using the Check & Connect model." Australian Journal of Guidance & Counseling, 9(1): 169-184.
BACKGROUNDJacob, Brian and Jens Ludwig. (2009). "Improving Educational Outcomes for Poor Children." In Changing Poverty, Changing Policies, edited by Maria Cancian and Sheldon Danziger. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
BACKGROUNDSinclair, M.F., Christenson, S.L., Evelo D. L., and C.M. Hurley (1998). "Dropout prevention for youth with disabilities: Efficacy of a sustained school engagement procedure." Exceptional Children, 65(1): 7-21.
BACKGROUNDSinclair, M. F., Christenson, S. L. and M. L. Thurlow. (2005). "Promoting school completion of urban secondary youth with emotional and behavioral disabilities." Exceptional Children, 71(4): 465-482.
BACKGROUND
Related Links
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Jonathan Guryan, Ph.D.
Northwestern University
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- PREVENTION
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Associate Professor of Human Development and Social Policy
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
November 18, 2011
First Posted
December 7, 2011
Study Start
September 1, 2011
Primary Completion
September 1, 2015
Study Completion
August 1, 2020
Last Updated
September 9, 2020
Record last verified: 2020-09