NCT01485315

Brief Summary

Patients with blood poisoning - sepsis - often receive blood transfusions in the intensive care unit. The evidence that blood transfusion leads to improved outcome is limited and the blood may be harmful to some of these patients. To bridge the gap between clinical practice and evidence, a large randomised clinical trial is needed to document the efficacy and safety of RBC transfusion in these very sick patients

Trial Health

90
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
1,005

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for phase_3

Timeline
Completed

Started Nov 2011

Geographic Reach
4 countries

32 active sites

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

November 1, 2011

Completed
29 days until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

November 30, 2011

Completed
5 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

December 5, 2011

Completed
2.2 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

March 1, 2014

Completed
1 month until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

April 1, 2014

Completed
Last Updated

October 3, 2014

Status Verified

October 1, 2014

Enrollment Period

2.3 years

First QC Date

November 30, 2011

Last Update Submit

October 2, 2014

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Mortality

    All cause 90 day mortality

    90 day

Secondary Outcomes (12)

  • Persistent organ failure

    Day 5

  • Persistent organ failure

    Day 14

  • Persistent organ failure

    Day 28

  • Anaphylactic/allergic reactions

    Followed up until ICU discharge; an expected average of one week

  • Haemolytic complications after transfusion of RBC

    Followed up until ICU discharge; an expected average of one week

  • +7 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (2)

Liberal blood transfusion

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Blood transfusion at haemoglobin 9.0 g/dl (5.6 mM) or less

Biological: SAGM (Saline-Adenine-Glucose-Mannitol) blood transfusion

Restrictive blood transfusion

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Blood transfusion at haemoglobin 7.0 g/dl (4.3 mM) or less

Biological: SAGM (Saline-Adenine-Glucose-Mannitol) blood transfusion

Interventions

One unit prestorage, leuko-depleted SAGM blood at haemoglobin at 9.0 g/dl (5.6 mM) or less at point-of-care testing

Also known as: Liberal red blood cell (RBC) transfusion
Liberal blood transfusion

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Patient in the ICU AND
  • Fulfil the criteria for septic shock AND
  • Have haemoglobin of 9.0 g/dl (5.6 mM) or less AND
  • Consent obtainable from patient or proxy or national law allows delayed consent

You may not qualify if:

  • Documented wish against transfusion OR
  • Previous serious adverse reaction with blood product OR
  • Acute coronary syndrome OR
  • Life-threatening bleeding OR
  • RBC transfusion during current ICU admission OR
  • Withdrawal from active therapy or brain death OR
  • Lack of informed consent (depending on national law) OR
  • Acute burn injury regardless of degree and burn surface area

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (32)

Ålborg University Hospital

Aalborg, Denmark

Location

Aarhus University Hospital, NBG

Aarhus, Denmark

Location

Aarhus University Hospital, Skejby

Aarhus, Denmark

Location

Bispebjerg Hospital

Copenhagen, Denmark

Location

Glostrup Hospital

Copenhagen, Denmark

Location

Hvidovre Hospital

Copenhagen, Denmark

Location

Rigshospitalet

Copenhagen, Denmark

Location

Gentofte Hospital

Gentofte Municipality, Denmark

Location

Herning Hospital

Herning, Denmark

Location

Hjørring Hospital

Hjørring, Denmark

Location

Holbæk Hospital

Holbæk, Denmark

Location

Horsens Hospital

Horsens, Denmark

Location

Kolding Hospital

Kolding, Denmark

Location

Køge Hospital

Køge, Denmark

Location

Næstved Hospital

Næstved, Denmark

Location

Randers Hospital

Randers, Denmark

Location

Slagelse Hospital

Slagelse, Denmark

Location

Sønderborg Hospital

Sønderborg, Denmark

Location

Vejle Hospital

Vejle, Denmark

Location

Helsinki University Hospital

Helsinki, Finland

Location

Joensuu Hospital

Joensuu, Finland

Location

Tampere University Hospital

Tampere, Finland

Location

Ålesund Hospital

Ålesund, Norway

Location

Haukeland University Hospital

Bergen, Norway

Location

Akershus University Hospital

Oslo, Norway

Location

Stavanger University Hospital

Stavanger, Norway

Location

Halmstad Hospital

Halmstad, Sweden

Location

Helsingborg Hospital

Helsingborg, Sweden

Location

Karolinska Hospital, Huddinge

Stockholm, Sweden

Location

Karolinska Institutet Solna

Stockholm, Sweden

Location

Södersjukhuset

Stockholm, Sweden

Location

Växjö Hospital

Vaxjo, Sweden

Location

Related Publications (4)

  • Holst LB, Haase N, Wetterslev J, Wernerman J, Aneman A, Guttormsen AB, Johansson PI, Karlsson S, Klemenzson G, Winding R, Nebrich L, Albeck C, Vang ML, Bulow HH, Elkjaer JM, Nielsen JS, Kirkegaard P, Nibro H, Lindhardt A, Strange D, Thormar K, Poulsen LM, Berezowicz P, Badstolokken PM, Strand K, Cronhjort M, Haunstrup E, Rian O, Oldner A, Bendtsen A, Iversen S, Langva JA, Johansen RB, Nielsen N, Pettila V, Reinikainen M, Keld D, Leivdal S, Breider JM, Tjader I, Reiter N, Gottrup U, White J, Wiis J, Andersen LH, Steensen M, Perner A. Transfusion requirements in septic shock (TRISS) trial - comparing the effects and safety of liberal versus restrictive red blood cell transfusion in septic shock patients in the ICU: protocol for a randomised controlled trial. Trials. 2013 May 23;14:150. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-14-150.

    PMID: 23702006BACKGROUND
  • Holst LB, Haase N, Wetterslev J, Wernerman J, Guttormsen AB, Karlsson S, Johansson PI, Aneman A, Vang ML, Winding R, Nebrich L, Nibro HL, Rasmussen BS, Lauridsen JR, Nielsen JS, Oldner A, Pettila V, Cronhjort MB, Andersen LH, Pedersen UG, Reiter N, Wiis J, White JO, Russell L, Thornberg KJ, Hjortrup PB, Muller RG, Moller MH, Steensen M, Tjader I, Kilsand K, Odeberg-Wernerman S, Sjobo B, Bundgaard H, Thyo MA, Lodahl D, Maerkedahl R, Albeck C, Illum D, Kruse M, Winkel P, Perner A; TRISS Trial Group; Scandinavian Critical Care Trials Group. Lower versus higher hemoglobin threshold for transfusion in septic shock. N Engl J Med. 2014 Oct 9;371(15):1381-91. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1406617. Epub 2014 Oct 1.

  • Carson JL, Stanworth SJ, Dennis JA, Fergusson DA, Pagano MB, Roubinian NH, Turgeon AF, Valentine S, Trivella M, Doree C, Hebert PC. Transfusion thresholds and other strategies for guiding red blood cell transfusion. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 Oct 20;10(10):CD002042. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002042.pub6.

  • Carson JL, Stanworth SJ, Dennis JA, Trivella M, Roubinian N, Fergusson DA, Triulzi D, Doree C, Hebert PC. Transfusion thresholds for guiding red blood cell transfusion. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Dec 21;12(12):CD002042. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002042.pub5.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Shock, Septic

Interventions

Blood TransfusionErythrocyte Count

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

SepsisInfectionsSystemic Inflammatory Response SyndromeInflammationPathologic ProcessesPathological Conditions, Signs and SymptomsShock

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Biological TherapyTherapeuticsBlood Cell CountCell CountCytological TechniquesClinical Laboratory TechniquesDiagnostic Techniques and ProceduresDiagnosisHematologic TestsInvestigative TechniquesCell Physiological PhenomenaBlood Physiological PhenomenaCirculatory and Respiratory Physiological Phenomena

Study Officials

  • Anders Perner, MD, PhD

    Dept. of Intensive Care, Rigshospitalet / SCCTG

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 3
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
SINGLE
Who Masked
OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Principle Investigator

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

November 30, 2011

First Posted

December 5, 2011

Study Start

November 1, 2011

Primary Completion

March 1, 2014

Study Completion

April 1, 2014

Last Updated

October 3, 2014

Record last verified: 2014-10

Locations